Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/096,257

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING BIT LINE PAD, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 12, 2023
Examiner
SALERNO, SARAH KATE
Art Unit
2814
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
620 granted / 852 resolved
+4.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
897
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 852 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant's amendment/arguments filed on 1/15/26 as being acknowledged and entered. By this amendment claims 5-7 and 21-24 are canceled, claims 25-27 have been added and claims 1-4, 8-20, and 25-27 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. US PGPub 2020/0343307. Claim 15: Lee teaches (Fig. 4) an electronic system, comprising: a main substrate; a semiconductor device on the main substrate; and a controller electrically connected to the semiconductor device on the main substrate, wherein: the semiconductor device includes: a gate stack structure including alternately stacked insulating patterns (33) and conductive patterns (Wn); a memory channel structure (40) extending through the gate stack structure; and a bit line pad (63) on the memory channel structure, the memory channel structure includes a variable resistance layer (44A/B), a channel layer (43A/B) surrounding the variable resistance layer, and a channel insulating layer (42A/B) surrounding the channel layer, the insulating patterns include an uppermost insulating pattern at an uppermost portion of the gate stack structure, and a level of a top surface of the variable resistance layer, a level of a top surface of the channel layer, and a level of a top surface of the channel insulating layer are each higher than a level of a top surface of the uppermost insulating pattern. Lee does not teach the top surfaces of the variable resistance layer, channel layer, and the channel insulating layer are coplanar. As evidenced by the prior art listed in the PTO-892, teach the top surfaces of the variable resistance layer, channel layer, and the channel insulating layer being coplanar is common in the art. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the tops to be coplanar as it is a common feature in the art. Claim 16: Lee teaches (Fig. 4) the semiconductor device further includes a cover insulating layer (52, 53) covering the gate stack structure, the memory channel structure, and the bit line pad; and a level of a bottom surface of the cover insulating layer is lower than the level of the top surface of the variable resistance layer, is lower than the level of the top surface of the channel layer, and is lower than the level of the top surface of the channel insulating layer. The claims does not describe how the cover insulating layer covers the bit line pad. It currently covers the side surface. Claim 17: Lee teaches (Fig. 4) the channel insulating layer has a surface contacting a side wall of the cover insulating layer. Claim 18: Lee teaches (Fig. 4) the surface of the channel insulating layer is coplanar with a side wall of the bit line pad. Claim 19: Lee teaches (Fig. 4) the surface of the channel insulating layer interconnects a side wall and the top surface of the channel insulating layer. Claim 20: Lee teaches (Fig. 4) the memory channel structure is spaced apart from the cover insulating layer. Claim 26: Lee teaches (Fig. 4) wherein the bit line pad contacts the variable resistance layer, channel layer and the channel insulating layer. The claim does not required direct physical contact. The references in the prior art listing also teach this claim limitation. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4 and 8-14 are allowed. The prior art of record does not teach the claim amendments presented in claims 1 and 8. Claims 25 and 27 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARAH KATE SALERNO whose telephone number is (571)270-1266. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30am-2:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wael Fahmy can be reached at 5712721705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARAH K SALERNO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2814
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 19, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 01, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 01, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 15, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598942
METHOD FOR ANALYZING LAYOUT PATTERN DENSITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12571927
RADIATION SENSOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563729
Method for Generating Vertical Channel Structures in Three-Dimensionally Integrated Semiconductor Memories
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563818
Methods of Forming Semiconductor Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557283
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.7%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 852 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month