Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/096,427

STACKED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CONFIGURED TO DISTINGUISH CHIPS WITHIN STACKED CHIPS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 12, 2023
Examiner
GOODWIN, DAVID J
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK Hynix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
536 granted / 799 resolved
-0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
78 currently pending
Career history
877
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 799 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/12/2023 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 12 and 19 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 12 recites “different logic levels each other” in lines 7 and 8. The examiner suggests “different from each other”. Claim 19 recites “different logic levels each other” in lines 7 and 8. The examiner suggests “different from each other”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (US 2020/0365593) in view of Ko (US 2014/0313845). Regarding claim 1. Chen teaches a stacked integrated circuit comprising: an upper chip (fig 4d:61; [para 0046]) that is rotated around a rotation axis and stacked on a lower chip (fig 4d:62; [para 0046]) in a mirror symmetric structure form (fig 4e:64; [para 0048]), wherein the lower chip (fig 4d:62; [para 0046]) and the upper chip (fig 4d:61; [para 0046]) are stacked in a front and front connection structure form (fig 4e:64; [para 0048]). Chen does not teach the details of the internal circuitry configuration. Ko teaches the upper chip (fig 4: 240; [para 0048]) configured to generate a first internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_slice<0,1>; [para 0050]) based on a distinguishment signal (fig 4:UP_slice<0:1>; [para 0050]), the upper chip (fig 4: 240; [para 0048]) configured to generate a first input and output (input/output) control signal (fig 4:dec_slice<0:3>; [para 0050]) for an input/output of a power signal based on the first internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_slice<0,1>; [para 0050]) and a chip selection signal (fig 4: CS#_SEL; [para 0050]), the lower chip (fig 4:230; [para 0048]) configured to generate a second internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_slice<0,1>; [para 0050]) based on a reset signal, and the lower chip (fig 4:230; [para 0048]) configured to generate a second input/output control signal (fig 4: DEC_Slice<0:3>; [para 0050]) for the input/output of the power signal based on the second internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_SLICE<0:1>; [para 0050]) and the chip selection signal (fig 4: CS#_SEL; [para 0049,0050]). PNG media_image1.png 740 1241 media_image1.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the input and output of the stacked chips to be controlled based on a distinguishment signal so that the data stored in each chip can be distinctly and specifically fetched, further by providing particular configuration to the die the die can be enabled to perform functions such as testing (Ko paragraph 8). Claim(s) 11 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (US 2020/0365593) in view of Ko (US 2014/0313845) Regarding claim 11, Chen discloses a stacked integrated circuit comprising: an upper chip (fig 4d:61; [para 0046]) that is rotated around a rotation axis and stacked on a lower chip (fig 4d:62; [para 0046]) in a mirror symmetric structure (fig 4e:64; [para 0048]) form, wherein the lower chip (fig 4e:62; [para 0046]) and the upper chip (fig 4e:61; [para 0046]) are stacked in a front and front connection structure form (fig 4e:64; [para 0048]), and each of the lower chip (fig 4e:62) and the upper chip (fig 4e:61) is configured […] ([para 0029]). Chen does not teach the details of configuration. Ko teaches each of a lower chip (fig 4:230; [para 0048]) and the upper chip (fig 4:240; [para 0048]) is configured to control an input of a first power signal (fig 4:239; [para 0049]) and a second power signal (fig 4:249; [para 0049]) based on an internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_slice<0:1>; [para 0050]) and an input and output (input/output) control signal (fig 4:DEC_slice<0:3> ; [para 0050], chip selection signal CS# combined with unique identifier to control the input and output of the chip). PNG media_image2.png 689 1246 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the input and output of the stacked chips to be controlled based on a distinguishment signal so that the data stored in each chip can be distinctly and specifically fetched, further by providing particular configuration to the die the die can be enabled to perform functions such as testing (Ko paragraph 8). Regarding claim 12, Chen in view of Ko discloses the stacked integrated circuit of claim 11, further: Ko teaches the internal distinguishment signal (fig4:ID_slice<0:1>; [para 0050]) comprises a first internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:id_slice; [para 0050]) that is generated (fig 4:241; [para 0050]) from the upper chip (fig 4:240; [para 0050]) and a second internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_slice<0:1>; [para 0050]) that is generated (fig 4:231; [para 0050]) from the lower chip (fig 4:230; [para 0050]), and logic levels (fig 3,<0:1>; [para 0060]) of the first internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_slice<0,1>; [para 0060]) and the second internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_slice<0,1>; [para 0060]) are generated to have different logic levels each other (unique ID; [para 0050,0060]). Claim(s) 18 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (US 2020/0365593) in view of Ko (US 2014/0313845) Regarding claim 18, Chen discloses a stacked integrated circuit (fig 4I; [para 0053]) comprising: an upper chip (fig 4e:61; [para 0048]) that is rotated around a rotation axis and stacked (fig 4e; [para 0048]) on a lower chip (fig 4e:62; [para 0048]) in a mirror symmetric structure form (fig 4d,e:64; [para 0043]), wherein the lower chip (fig 4e:62) and the upper chip (fig 4e:61) are stacked in a front and front connection structure form (fig 4d,4e; [para 0048]), and each of the lower chip (fig 4e:62) and the upper chip (fig 4e:61) is configured […]; ([para 0029]). Chen does not teach the details of configuration, Ko teaches each of a lower chip (fig 4:230; [para 0048]) and the upper chip (fig 4:240; [para 0048]) is configured to control an output of a first power signal (fig 4:239; [para 0049]) and a second power signal (fig 4:unit 249; [para 0049]) based on an internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:ID_slice<0,1>; [para 0050]) and an input and output (input/output) control signal (fig 4:DEC_SLICE<0:3>; [para 0050], chip selection signal CS# combined with unique identifier to control the input and output of the chip) (see also annotated fig 4). PNG media_image2.png 689 1246 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the input and output of the stacked chips to be controlled based on a distinguishment signal so that the data stored in each chip can be distinctly and specifically fetched, further by providing particular configuration to the die the die can be enabled to perform functions such as testing (Ko paragraph 8). Regarding claim 19, Chen in view of Ko teaches the stacked integrated circuit of claim 18, further: Ko teaches the internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:id_slice<0,1>; [para 0050]) comprises a first internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:id_slice<0,1> in chip 240; [para 0050]) that is generated from the upper chip (fig 4:240) and a second internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:id_slice<0,1> in chip 230; [para 0050]) that is generated from the lower chip (fig 4:230), and logic levels of the first internal distinguishment signal and the second internal distinguishment signal (fig 4:id_slice<0,1>; [para 0050]) are generated ([para 0064]) to have different logic levels from each other (unique ID; [para 0050,0060]) (see also annotated fig 4). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 through 10, 13 through 17 and 20 through 24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, the prior art does not teach a stacked integrated circuit comprising: an upper chip that is rotated around a rotation axis and stacked on a lower chip in a mirror symmetric structure form, and the lower chip configured to generate a second input/output control signal for the input/output of the power signal based on the second internal distinguishment signal and the chip selection signal, the upper chip comprises: a first rear pad configured to receive the distinguishment signal; and a second rear pad configured to receive the chip selection signal in combination with other elements of the claim. Regarding claim 13, the prior art does not teach a stacked integrated circuit comprising: an upper chip that is rotated around a rotation axis and stacked on a lower chip in a mirror symmetric structure form, and each of the lower chip and the upper chip is configured to control an input of a first power signal and a second power signal based on an internal distinguishment signal and an input and output (input/output) control signal, and the first input/output control signal and the second input/output control signal are selectively activated in response to a chip selection signal in combination with other elements of the claim. Regarding claim 20, the prior art does not teach, a stacked integrated circuit comprising: an upper chip that is rotated around a rotation axis and stacked on a lower chip in a mirror symmetric structure form, and the upper chip is configured to control an output of a first power signal and a second power signal based on an internal distinguishment signal and an input and output (input/output) control signal, the input/output control signal comprises a first input/output control signal that is generated from the upper chip and a second input/output control signal that is generated from the lower chip, and the first input/output control signal and the second input/output control signal are selectively activated in response to a chip selection signal. Prior Art Listing of relevant prior art: Lee (US 2020/0303030), Lee (US 12438126) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID J GOODWIN whose telephone number is (571)272-8451. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 11:00 - 19:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kretelia Graham can be reached at (571)272-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.J.G/Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /Kretelia Graham/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2817 January 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12575453
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12550711
INTERCONNECTION FABRIC FOR BURIED POWER DISTRIBUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12525557
Die-Beam Alignment for Laser-Assisted Bonding
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12500127
METHOD OF FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12494426
TRANSISTOR CAPABLE OF ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLING A THRESHOLD VOLTAGE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING THE TRANSISTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+16.7%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 799 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month