Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/099,210

SUBSTRATE SUPPORT CARRIER HAVING MULTIPLE CERAMIC DISCS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 19, 2023
Examiner
ADDISU, SARA
Art Unit
3722
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
680 granted / 798 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
814
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
65.4%
+25.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 798 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Parkhe (US Pub. No. 2022/0270906) Regarding claim 1, Parkhe discloses a substrate support carrier for use in a processing chamber, the substrate support carrier comprising: an electrostatic chuck (ESC) assembly comprising: a top ceramic disc (108) having a recess formed from a lower surface of the top ceramic disc; a bottom ceramic disc (102) having a hole through the bottom ceramic disc (figure 1); an upper bonding layer (114) interposed between the lower surface of the top ceramic disc (108) and an upper surface of the bottom ceramic disc (102); and a porous plug (116) within at least one of the recess of the top ceramic disc and the hole of the bottom ceramic disc (figure 1); a temperature control base (122); and a lower bonding layer (121) interposed between a lower surface of the bottom ceramic disc (102) and an upper surface of the temperature control base (122)(figure 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over YE et al. (US Pub. No. 2021/0118716) and as evidenced by Parkhe (US Pub. No. 2022/0270906). Regarding claim 1, YE et al. discloses a substrate support carrier for use in a processing chamber, the substrate support carrier comprising: an electrostatic chuck (ESC) (100) assembly comprising: a top ceramic disc (130) having a recess (131) formed from a lower surface of the top ceramic disc; a bottom ceramic disc (110) having a hole (112) through the bottom ceramic disc (figures 1 and 2); an upper bonding layer (120) interposed between the lower surface of the top ceramic disc (130) and an upper surface of the bottom ceramic disc (110); and a porous plug (1110/1313: paragraph 66, lines 13-15) within at least one of the recess (131) of the top ceramic disc (130) and the hole (112) of the bottom ceramic disc (110) (figures 2 and 4-14); a temperature control base (500) (figure 1); and a lower bonding layer interposed between a lower surface of the bottom ceramic disc and an upper surface of the temperature control base. Regarding claim 2, YE et al. discloses wherein the porous plug (1110) includes an in-situ sleeve (1114) at least partially encapsulating the porous plug (1110) (figure 8 and paragraph 70). Regarding claim 3, YE et al. discloses wherein the porous plug (1110) extends within the hole of the bottom ceramic disc and does not extend within the recess of the top ceramic disc (figures 4-7). Regarding claim 4, YE et al. discloses 4. (Original) The substrate support carrier of claim 1, wherein the porous plug extends within the recess of the top ceramic disc and does not extend within the hole of the bottom ceramic disc. Regarding claim 5, YE et al. discloses wherein the porous plug comprises a top porous plug (1312/1313/1314) extending within the recess of the top ceramic disc (130) and a bottom porous plug (1111) extending within the hole of the bottom ceramic disc (110) (figures 11-14). Regarding claim 6, YE et al. discloses wherein the top porous plug is manufactured monolithically as a part of the top ceramic disc, and the bottom porous plug is manufactured monolithically as a part of the bottom ceramic disc. Regarding claim 7, YE et al. discloses wherein wherein the porous plug further comprises a center porous plug between the top porous plug and the bottom porous plug, extending within an opening of the upper bonding layer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARA ADDISU at (571) 272-6082. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday 9:00 am - 5:00 pm (Mondays and Wednesday-Friday). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K. Singh can be reached on (571) 272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARA ADDISU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3722 5/14/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2023
Application Filed
May 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636713
MODULAR HYDRAULIC CHUCK
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636709
CUTTING TOOL AND INDEXABLE CUTTING INSERT HAVING A MOUNTING CUT-OUT THEREFOR
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629759
REVERSE FACE ANGLE GEAR CUTTER AND COOLANT DELIVERY ASSEMBLY
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623295
Mandrel Assembly for Use With a Rotary Tool
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617021
Y-AXIS PARTING ADAPTOR FOR A CUTTING TOOL
3y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 798 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month