Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/099,527

CONTROL APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jan 20, 2023
Examiner
DIAO, M BAYE
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Denso Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1247 granted / 1424 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1464
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1424 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Acknowledgement is made of amendment filed on 12/29/2025 in which claims 1,3,15,19 and 20 are currently amended while claim 2 has been canceled. By this amendment, claims 1,3-20 are still pending in the application for prosecution. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1,3-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1,3-4,12-15,18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fukada et al., (Fukada) US 2019/0140327. Regarding claims 1 and 20: Fukada at least discloses and shows in Figs. 1-2 and 5: A control apparatus for a vehicle(not shown but battery 10 is mounted on a vehicle; see [0023]),the vehicle including a storage battery(30)(see [0024]) that stores therein electric power that is supplied from an external power supply apparatus(such as three-phase AC power supplied from the outside from the terminals 90, see [0025]), and a rotating electric machine([0083]) that is driven by electric power from the storage battery(30),the control apparatus comprising: a temperature adjusting unit(50)([0027],[0029],[0039],[0050]-[0053],[0068],[0080])that adjusts a temperature of the storage battery(30), wherein the temperature adjusting unit(50) performs an internal temperature adjustment process that is a process for adjusting the temperature of the storage battery using energy other than the electric power supplied from the power supply apparatus(see [0052]-[0053]), and the temperature adjusting unit performs the internal temperature adjustment process using electric power stored in the storage battery(see [0052]-[0053]). Regarding claim 19: Fukada at least discloses and shows in Figs. 1-2 and 5: A control system(controller 55 is part of battery system 10 which is mounted on a vehicle) for a vehicle(not shown but battery 10 is mounted on a vehicle; see [0023]), the vehicle including a storage battery(30) that stores therein electric power that is supplied from an external power supply apparatus(such as three-phase AC power supplied from the outside from the terminals 90, see [0025]), and a rotating electric machine(see [0083]) that is driven by electric power from the storage battery(30),the control system(55) comprising: a processor(see [0049]);a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium(ROM)(see [0049]); a set of computer-executable instructions stored in the computer-readable storage medium that, when read and executed by the processor, cause the processor to implement: adjusting(via temperature adjustment unit 50) a temperature of the storage battery(30); and performing an internal temperature adjustment process that is a process for adjusting the temperature of the storage battery(30) using energy other than the electric power supplied from the power supply apparatus([0052]-[0053], [0057]-[0059] and Fig. 4), and performing the internal temperature adjustment process using electric power stored in the storage battery(see [0052]-[0053]). Accordingly claims 1,19 and 20 are anticipated. Regarding claim 3, Fukuda discloses, wherein: the temperature adjusting unit performs the internal temperature adjustment process when an amount of electric power stored in the storage battery(30) is equal to or greater than a predetermined value(target temperature and in view of the Peltier effect)(see [0053],[0055]-[0062]). Regarding claim 4, Fukuda discloses wherein: the temperature adjusting unit(50) performs the internal temperature adjustment process when the temperature of the storage battery is outside a predetermined temperature range that is suitable for charging([0058]-[0059],[0065],[0067]-[0068]). Regarding claim 12, Fukuda discloses, wherein: the temperature adjusting unit(50) starts the internal temperature adjustment process before the vehicle and the power supply apparatus are connected to each other(since the temperature adjustment unit 50 operate by being supplied with electric power stored in the storage battery 30; see [0052] or when the power storage device 10 may be used as a stationary type power storage device installed in a building as a part of the HEMS, or may be used as a power storage device installed in a base station for mobile phones; see [0023]). Regarding claim 13, Fukuda discloses, wherein: the temperature adjusting unit(50) starts the internal temperature adjustment process after the vehicle and the power supply apparatus are connected to each other(inherently as the vehicle is being charged and since the process is repeated, see [0057]). Regarding claim 14, Fukuda discloses, wherein: the temperature adjusting unit(50) adjusts the temperature of the storage battery(30) using the electric power supplied from the power supply apparatus(via terminals 90,91)(see [0024]-[0025]) while performing the internal temperature adjustment process. Regarding claim 15, Fukuda discloses, wherein: the temperature adjusting unit(50) performs the internal temperature adjustment process when the temperature of the storage battery is outside a predetermined temperature range that is suitable for charging(0 to 20℃, preferably 10℃ to 20℃)([0058]-[0059],[0065],[0067]-[0068]). Regarding claim 18, Fukuda teaches, wherein: the temperature adjusting unit(50) determines whether the internal temperature adjustment process can be continued while performing the internal temperature adjustment process(see [0057]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-11,16-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claims 5 and 16, the prior art of record does not teach or reasonably suggest, among other patentable features, further comprising: a determining unit that determines a start timing of the internal temperature adjustment process. Regarding claim 17, the prior art of record fails to teach or reasonably suggest, wherein: the temperature adjusting unit determines whether the internal temperature adjustment process is performed based on both a predicted value of an amount of electric power required for the internal temperature adjustment process and a predicted value of electric power that can be supplied to the storage battery from the power supply apparatus. Claims 6-11 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 5 and thus are also allowed for the same reasons. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. M’BAYE DIAO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2859 /M BAYE DIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 January 27, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 20, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 29, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600265
POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, ELECTRIC VEHICLE PROVIDED WITH POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594854
BATTERY CONTROL SYSTEM, BATTERY CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589665
PEER-TO-PEER DC FAST CHARGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592426
COLD WEATHER SMART BATTERY HEATING AND CHARGING STRATEGY UTILIZING MULTI-STAGE BATTERY HEATING CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583353
SERVER AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-2.3%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1424 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month