Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/100,031

RADIATION-SENSITIVE RESIN COMPOSITION, METHOD OF FORMING RESIST PATTERN, AND COMPOUND

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 23, 2023
Priority
Jan 25, 2022 — JP 2022-009714 +1 more
Examiner
ROBINSON, CHANCEITY N
Art Unit
1737
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
JSR Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
774 granted / 1071 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -13% lift
Without
With
+-13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1098
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1071 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The indicated allowability of claims 1, 2, 4-8 and 10-22 are withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to Nemoto et al. (JP 2020-203984) and Kinoshita (JP 2022-07909 A ). Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4-8, 10-12 and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nemoto et al. (JP 2020-203984). Regrading claims 1, 2, 4-8, 10-12 and 16-20, Nemoto et al. teach a radiation-sensitive resin composition ( Embodiment 10 in Table 4, abstract and claims) comprising a polymer ( see formula a-1 “ polymer having a structural unit that includes an acid liable group ( see abstract) meeting the limitation of a polymer, solubility of which in a developer solution is capable of being altered by an action of an acid as instantly claimed. ) , a radiation-sensitive acid generator ( see formula “B-5” PNG media_image1.png 146 309 media_image1.png Greyscale [0192]) and a compound represented by formula (1): PNG media_image2.png 146 427 media_image2.png Greyscale ( see formula “C-10” : PNG media_image3.png 152 320 media_image3.png Greyscale [0188] wherein R1 is CH3SCH2O is an monovalent organic group having 1 to 20 carbon atoms, a is 1 and L1 is-CH2-O- and R2 is substituted aromatic hydrocarbon group having 6 to 20 carbon atoms) meeting the limitation as instantly claimed. Kinoshita teaches a pattern forming method comprising ( coating step) a forming a resist film directly or indirectly on a substrate by applying the radiation-sensitive resin composition ; exposing the resist film ( exposure step); and developing the resist film exposed ( development step) ( examples and claims). Claim(s) 13-15 and 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nemoto et al. (JP 2020-203984). Regarding claims 13-15 and 21-22, Nemoto et al. teach (Ex. 10, abstract and claims) teach a compound represented by formula (1): PNG media_image2.png 146 427 media_image2.png Greyscale ( see formula “C-10” : PNG media_image3.png 152 320 media_image3.png Greyscale [0188] wherein R1 is CH3SCH2O is a monovalent organic group having 1 to 20 carbon atoms, a is 1 and L1 is-CH2-O- and R2 is substituted aromatic hydrocarbon group having 6 to 20 carbon atoms) meeting the limitation of the instant claims. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4-8 and 10-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kinoshita (JP 2022-07909 A ). Regarding claims 1, 2, 4-8 and 10-22, Kinoshita teaches a radiation-sensitive resin composition ( see abstract, claims, and embodiment 44) comprising a polymer ( see “formula a-27 “ PNG media_image4.png 191 171 media_image4.png Greyscale [0051] meeting the limitation of a polymer, solubility of which in a developer solution is capable of being altered by an action of an acid as instantly claimed. ) , a radiation-sensitive acid generator ( see formula “C-8 PNG media_image5.png 121 296 media_image5.png Greyscale [0258]) and a compound represented by formula (1): PNG media_image2.png 146 427 media_image2.png Greyscale ( see formula “D-4” : PNG media_image6.png 183 391 media_image6.png Greyscale [0290] wherein a is 0 and L1 is-CH2-O- and R2 is substituted aromatic hydrocarbon group having 6 to 20 carbon atoms) meeting the limitation of independent claim 1 and the compound as recited by independent claim 13. Kinoshita teaches a pattern forming method comprising step (1) a forming a resist film directly or indirectly on a substrate by applying the radiation-sensitive resin composition ; exposing the resist film ( step 2); and developing the resist film exposed ( step 3) ( examples and claims). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHANCEITY N ROBINSON whose telephone number is (571)270-3786. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (8:00 am-6:00 pm; IFP; PHP). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Huff can be reached at 571-272-1385. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHANCEITY N ROBINSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Oct 30, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681393
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDITIONING OPTICAL APPARATUSES
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675047
CONDUCTIVE POLYMER COMPOSITION, COATED PRODUCT, AND PATTERNING PROCESS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675045
POLYMER, PHOTORESIST COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING THE SAME, AND PATTERN FORMATION METHODS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662629
LIQUID CRYSTAL COMPOSITIONS AND DISPLAY PANELS USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663723
WASHOUT PROCESSOR AND WASHING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (-13.4%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1071 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month