Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/101,149

TWO PIECE HOLLOW-VANE ASSEMBLY JOINED VIA BRAZING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 25, 2023
Examiner
SAAD, ERIN BARRY
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
OA Round
8 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
8-9
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
918 granted / 1272 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1311
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.2%
+28.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1272 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/17/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 14-15, 17-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zaccardi et al. (2019/0078452) in view of Weisse (2013/0108470A1). Regarding claim 1, Zaccardi discloses a process of brazing one single cover 32b to an open body 32a for a hollow vane assembly comprising: forming the open body (fabricated, paragraph 0057), the open body including an interior (where internal passages 50a, b are located) (paragraph 0058, figures 3-6), wherein the open body comprises a single piece design; forming at least one cover support structure 78 in said open body proximate the interior; forming the single cover 32b (fabricated, paragraph 0057), the single cover being configured to attach to the open body to form at least one flow passage 50a, b; and brazing only the one single cover to the open body (figures 3-6, paragraph 0057-0058). Zaccardi discloses that the open body and the single cover comprises a different material from the matrix, but is silent to the at least one open body and the single cover being composed of a rigid material, the rigid material selected form the group consisting of a metal alloy composition, a heat-resistant super alloy composition, a nickel-based composition, and a cobalt based composition. However, Weisse discloses a turbine blade with a cover bonded to an open body. Weisse discloses that the open body 12 can be a cobalt or nickel-based superalloy (paragraph 0024). To one skilled in the art at the time of the invention it would have been obvious to use a known material for at turbine as taught by Weisse because Weisse discloses that the material is light and durable for increased strength and impact resistance (paragraph 0024). Regarding claim 2, Zaccardi discloses forming the at least one flow passage 50a,b between the at least one cover support structure and an interior wall of the open body (figures 3-6, paragraph 0058). Regarding claim 3, Zaccardi discloses that the at least one flow passage 50a,b is configured as multiple cooling channels that allow for cooling fluid to flow through the interior (paragraph 0058, figures 3-6). Regarding claim 4, Zaccardi discloses forming an airfoil from the combination of the open body brazed together with the single cover (figure 6). Regarding claim 14, Zaccardi discloses a process for joining one single cover 32b to an open body 32a comprising: forming the open body (fabricated, paragraph 0057), the open body includes a leading edge 64 opposite a trailing edge 62, the open body includes a pressure side (top of open body) and suction side (bottom of open body) opposite the pressure side (figure 3-6), the open body including an interior (where internal passages 50a, b are located) (paragraph 0058, figures 3-6); forming at least one cover support structure 78 in said open body proximate the interior; forming the single cover (fabricated 0057), the single cover being configured to couple with the open body proximate the pressure side to form at least one flow passage 50a,b (paragraph 0058, figures 3-6); and brazing only the one single cover to the open body (figures 3-6, paragraph 0057-0058). Zaccardi discloses that the open body and the single cover comprises a different material from the matrix, but is silent to the at least one open body and the single cover being composed of a rigid material, the rigid material selected form the group consisting of a metal alloy composition, a heat-resistant super alloy composition, a nickel-based composition, and a cobalt based composition. However, Weisse discloses a turbine blade with a cover bonded to an open body. Weisse discloses that the open body 12 can be a cobalt or nickel-based superalloy (paragraph 0024). To one skilled in the art at the time of the invention it would have been obvious to use a known material for at turbine as taught by Weisse because Weisse discloses that the material is light and durable for increased strength and impact resistance (paragraph 0024). Regarding claim 15, Zaccardi discloses forming structural joints (at indentations 77, paragraph 0062, figure 3) along the union between the cover support structure and the cover (figure 3). Regarding claim 17, Zaccardi discloses forming the at least one flow passage 50a,b between the at least one cover support structure and an interior wall of the open body (figures 3-6). Regarding claim 18, Zaccardi discloses that the at least one flow passage 50a,b is configured as multiple cooling channels that allow for cooling fluid to flow through the interior (paragraph 0058). Regarding claim 19, Zaccardi discloses forming an airfoil from the combination of the open body brazed together with the single cover (figure 6). Regarding claim 20, Zaccardi discloses that at least one cover support structure 78 comprises raised surface features (each sidewall and top surface are considered raised surface features as they are all extend up from the open body) of the open body that extend from the open body distally (figures 3-6). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-4, 14-15, 17-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection provided above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIN B SAAD whose telephone number is (571)270-3634. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:30a-6p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Walker can be reached at 571-272-3458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIN B SAAD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 14 earlier events
Jun 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678892
METHOD FOR MACHINING A MATERIAL
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678877
ELECTRON BEAM BRAZING TO REPAIR COMPONENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673390
REPAIR WELDING SYSTEM, REPAIR WELDING METHOD, INSPECTION DEVICE, AND ROBOT CONTROL DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667906
METHODS OF CALIBRATING AN ULTRASONIC CHARACTERISTIC ON A WIRE BONDING SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654252
ELEMENT, METHOD OF FRICTION ELEMENT WELDING, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FRICTION-ELEMENT-WELDED JOINT
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1272 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month