Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/104,888

DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 02, 2023
Priority
May 30, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0066345
Examiner
SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
658 granted / 920 resolved
+3.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
998
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.1%
+44.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) rejected have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim 20130341597. PNG media_image1.png 416 557 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, fig. 1 of Kim discloses a display device comprising: a base layer 41 (between 11 and 30) including a first surface (top) and a second (bottom) surface opposite to the first surface in a first direction Z; a first line P10 disposed on the first surface of the base layer; a second line P20 corresponding to the first line and disposed on the second surface of the base layer; and a connection film 20 electrically contacting at least a portion of the second line and electrically connected to a printed circuit board 30 and a driving circuit 21, wherein the driving circuit 21 is disposed between the printed circuit board 30 and the connection film 20 in the first direction, and the printed circuit board 30 is disposed between the second surface of the base layer 11 and at least a portion of the connection film 20 in the first direction Z. Regarding claim 2, fig. 1 of Kim discloses wherein the printed circuit board 30 and the connection film 20 electrically contact each other on a first point (point of P20) between a second point (point of 21 contact) corresponding to a first end (left end and there exist some type of correspondence) of the printed circuit board and a third point (right end) corresponding to a second end of the printed circuit board. Regarding claim 3, fig. 1 of Kim discloses wherein the printed circuit board 30 and the connection film 20 are electrically connected to each other by a bonding pad (top surface of P20) including a pad electrode (the electrode of P20). Regard claim 4, fig. 1 of Kim discloses wherein the driving circuit is located at the second point. Regarding claim 5, fig. 1 of Kim necessary discloses wherein the driving circuit 21 at least partially overlaps the printed circuit 30 board in a plan view. Regarding claim 10, fig. 1 of Kim discloses further comprising: a first protective layer (top surface layer of 20 is a layer) disposed on an entire area of the second surface including the second line P20 and including an area exposing at least a portion of the second line (end portion in the X direction). Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JU 20210343951. PNG media_image2.png 546 525 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 20, fig. 10 of Ju discloses a display device comprising: a base layer SUB including a first surface (top) and a second surface (bottom); a first line DLS disposed on the first surface of the base layer; a second line BPE2 corresponding to the first line and disposed on the second surface of the base layer; and a connection film CAM electrically contacting at least a portion of the second line BPE2 and electrically connected to a printed circuit board 300 and a driving circuit 200 (BPE2 is electrically connected to 300 and therefore electrically connected to 200), wherein the driving circuit 200, the connection film CAM, and the printed circuit board 300 at least partially overlap with each other in a plan view (this is necessary the case as the cross-sectional view shows overlap). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VONGSAVANH SENGDARA whose telephone number is (571)270-5770. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, PURVIS A. Sue can be reached on (571)272-1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VONGSAVANH SENGDARA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 04, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 21, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641879
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635586
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12615948
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12615921
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607596
Nanostructure platform for cellular interfacing and corresponding manufacturing method
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+18.8%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month