Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/109,003

HIGH PURITY SULFUR-DOPED COPPER SPUTTERING TARGET ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 13, 2023
Examiner
MCDONALD, RODNEY GLENN
Art Unit
1794
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Tosoh SMD, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
782 granted / 1241 resolved
-2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1294
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.0%
+14.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1241 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7, 11, 15-17, 23-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 7, line 2, is confusing because “comprised of at least one of copper” covers the alloys listed. Claim 7, line 2, is confusing because “copper alloys” covers the other alloys in the claim. Claim 11, line 1, is indefinite because “the melting step” lacks antecedent basis. It is suggested to delete the word “step”. Claim 15, line 13, is indefinite because “the thermomechanical processing step” lacks antecedent basis. It is suggested to delete the word “step”. Claim 25, line 7, is confusing because “comprised of at least one of copper” covers the alloys listed. Claim 25, line 7, is confusing because “copper alloys” covers the other alloys in the claim. Claim 25, line 12, is indefinite because “the melting step” lacks antecedent basis. It is suggested to delete the word “step”. Claim 16, line 13, is indefinite because “the thermomechanical processing step” lacks antecedent basis. It is suggested to delete the word “step”. Claim 29, line 7, is confusing because “comprised of at least one of copper” covers the alloys listed. Claim 29, line 7, is confusing because “copper alloys” covers the other alloys in the claim. Claim 29, line 12, is indefinite because “the melting step” lacks antecedent basis. It is suggested to delete the word “step”. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 1-6, 8, 9, 13 are allowable over the prior art of record because the prior art of record does not teach does not teach claimed subject matter including wherein the predetermined sulfur concentration value range is between and includes about 0.35-0.65 wt% sulfur throughout the ingot, the predetermined variance in the sulfur concentration value is about 15% or less, and predetermined percent difference threshold for sulfur concentration values is 30% or less. Claims 7, 11, 15-17, 23-30 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed August 14, 2025 have been fully considered. New 35 U.S.C. 112 2nd paragraph rejections have been made. This action will be made Non-Final based on the new rejections. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY GLENN MCDONALD whose telephone number is (571)272-1340. The examiner can normally be reached Hoteling: M-Th every Fri off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Lin can be reached at 571-272-8902. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RODNEY G MCDONALD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1794 RM November 14, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 14, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603264
SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING TOOL AND METHODS OF OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595548
DOPED NICKEL OXIDE TARGET AND PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584217
TRAY ASSEMBLIES FOR PRECURSOR DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580157
Grid Assembly for Plasma Processing Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577638
CASTABLE ALUMINUM ALLOYS FOR WAFER HANDLING CHAMBERS IN SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+24.3%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1241 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month