Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/116,428

BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 02, 2023
Examiner
MANG, LAL C
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
135 granted / 174 resolved
+9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
228
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 174 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant' s amendment and response filed 12/10/2025 has been entered and made record. This application contains 7 pending claims. Claim 1 has been amended. Claim 7 has been cancelled. Claim 8 has been added. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/10/2025 regarding claims rejections under 35 U.S.C. 103 in claims 1-7 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. A newly discovered prior art, Jung KR 101416798B1, will be used in combination with prior arts cited in the previous office action to reject the newly added claim 8 limitations. The applicant argues on pages 5-7 of the remark filed on 12/10/2025 that “… In contrast to Applicant's claimed invention, Wright discloses that the battery information of all of the individual BPMs (Battery Pack Modules) that comprise a "pack" (which corresponds to Applicant's recited battery "unit") is monitored and transmitted to the user via a server (see, for example, paragraphs [0013], [0038], and [0071] of Wright). Wright does not teach or suggest that only the battery information of the overall battery pack should or could be transmitted to the server, or that any advantages or benefits would or could have been obtained thereby. For example, Wright does not teach or suggest that transmitting only the battery information of the overall battery pack would have been beneficial in order to, e.g., reduce the amount of data communication between an information processing unit and a server (see again, for example, paragraphs [0009] and [0017] of Applicant's specification).” Applicant continue to argue that “With respect to Applicant's claim 4, the Examiner alleged on pages 6-7 of the Office Action that it would have been obvious to select and transmit [only] a portion of the battery unit information of Wright "as needed." However, this allegation by the Examiner is purely speculative and certainly not based on the objective teachings of Wright (see again, for example, paragraphs [0013], [0038], and [0071] of Wright). … the Examiner's allegation is contrary to the overall teachings of Wright that all of the individual BPMs are monitored and transmitted to the user via the server … . Thus, Takeda in view of Wright fails to teach or suggest the features of …”. The Examiner respectfully disagrees the applicant’s argument. Wright discloses that each individual BPM includes one or more battery cells and a module controller. The BPM is the building block for larger power packs or battery pack (Wright, FIG. 1, [0012], [0022]), and thus, a battery pack consists of one or more battery cells or BPMs. The BPMs or battery cells are in operative communication with the controller, and the controller acquires the BMP’s cell voltage, cell temperature, current, pressure sensor voltage (Wright, FIG. 1, [0052], [0055], [0056]). Wright further teaches that the Smart Management Module (SMM) sends BPM data (e.g., voltage, temp and status) or BMP cell voltage, cell temperature, and other BPMs related data to a remote server or the device (Wright, [0087]). The SMM sends the battery cell voltage, the battery cell temperature, and other BMP data. However, Wright does not explicitly teach that the battery pack information is sent to a server. Thus, Wright teaches that SMM or the information processing send or transmit to the server only the battery cell or BPM or unit information, however, the SMM does not explicitly send the battery pack information to the server. Therefore, the combination of Takeda and Wright teaches the information processing unit is configured to transmit to the server only the battery unit information and not the battery pack information. Claims 2-6 depend from claim 1 and thus, the dependent claims 2-6 are also ineligible over the same reasons set forth in independent claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takeda (EP 2645515 A2, hereinafter Takeda) in view of Wright et al. (US 20150295430, hereinafter Wright). As to claim 1, Takeda teaches an information processing unit to obtain battery pack information representing a status of the plurality of battery packs and obtain battery unit information representing a status of the battery unit based on the obtained battery pack information (FIG. 2 and [0014] disclose “cell control unit (CCU) 210 collects battery information such as current information, voltage information, temperature information, state of charge (i.e., obtain battery unit information such as current, voltage, temperature, and SOC representing a status of the battery unit – emphasis added by Examiner) and the like of the battery cells of the battery cell groups 20, and a battery module control unit (BMCU) 31.”; [0015] discloses “The battery pack 40 includes the plural battery modules 30 and the battery pack control unit 230. The battery pack control unit 230 collects the battery information outputted from each of the battery module control units 31”). Takeda does not explicitly teach a server to receive the battery unit information transmitted from the information processing unit and transmit at least a portion of the received battery unit information to a user terminal; wherein the information processing unit is operable to transmit to the server only a portion of the battery unit information obtained based on the battery pack information. Wright teaches a server to receive the battery unit information transmitted from the information processing unit and transmit at least a portion of the received battery unit information to a user terminal ([0015] discloses “The SMM can receive pack voltage, pack current, temperature, pressure sensor data”; [0016] discloses a software application, or hardware logic, installed on a personal computer, a mobile device, or a remote server can communicate through a wired or wireless interface with the Smart Management Module (SMM), or the Battery Pack Modules (BPM) terminal to provide useful information to the user (i.e., a software application installed on a remote server can communicate to provide the battery unit information to the user terminal – emphasis added by Examiner), dealer, repair center and/or manufacturer. The SMM can receive commands from the user connection to send, store/save, and configure operating limits and parameters for the system); wherein the information processing unit is configured to transmit to the server only the battery unit information and not the battery pack information ([0012], [0052], and [0087] disclose each Battery Pack Module (BPM) 12 include a module controller and one or more battery cells, and a larger power packs include several BPM as shown in FIG. 1. Inputs of the BPM are in operative communication with the controller 13 and can include a cell voltage input 30, a temperature sensor voltage input 32, a current monitor 41, a pressure sensor voltage input 34, and a sensor 35. The Smart Management Module (SMM) sends BPM data (e.g., voltage, temp and status), other BMP related data to a remote server or the device (i.e., each BPM includes battery cells, and battery cells voltage, battery cells temperature, and battery cells status data are acquired and sent to a remote server. The SMM or information processing unit sends or transmits battery cells voltage, temperature, and status data to a remote server. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would be able to select and transmit battery cells voltage or battery cells temperature or a portion of the battery unit information obtained based on the battery pack information to a remote server, as needed. Moreover, Wright does not explicitly teach that the battery pack information is transmitted to a server – emphasis added by Examiner)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Wright into Takeda for the purpose of defining a smart battery system providing detailed feedback, flexible configurations, and upgrades in order to allow for selective diagnosis, repair or replacement of bad individual cells. This combination would improve in discarding only the few bad battery cells so that unnecessary costs can be reduced and contribution to waste can be prevented. As to claim 2, the combination of Takeda and Wright teaches the claimed limitations as discussed in claim 1. Takeda teaches the battery pack information includes information regarding at least one of voltage, current, output, temperature, or state of charge of each of the plurality of battery packs (FIG. 2, [0014] and [0015] disclose the battery pack 40 includes the plural battery modules 30 and the battery pack control unit 230, and cell control unit (CCU) 210 collects battery information such as current information, voltage information, temperature information, state of charge of the battery cell groups 20); and the information processing unit is operable to calculate the battery unit information using the battery pack information ([0014] discloses “The battery module control unit (BMCU) 31 calculates an average state of charge of the battery cell groups 20 in the battery module 30, adds the battery information of the average state of charge of the battery cell groups 20 to the battery information mentioned before”). As to claim 3, the combination of Takeda and Wright teaches the claimed limitations as discussed in claim 1. Takeda teaches wherein the battery unit information includes information regarding at least one of voltage, current, output, temperature, or state of charge of the battery unit ([0015] discloses “The SMM can receive pack voltage, pack current, temperature, pressure sensor data”; [0037] discloses an SOC arithmetic part 243 calculates the state of charge (SOC) of the battery pack 40). As to claim 4, the combination of Takeda and Wright teaches the claimed limitations as discussed in claim 1. Takeda does not explicitly teach wherein the information processing unit is operable to transmit to the server only a portion of the battery unit information obtained based on the battery pack information. Wright teaches wherein the information processing unit is operable to transmit to the server only a portion of the battery unit information obtained based on the battery pack information ([0012], [0052], and [0087] disclose each Battery Pack Module (BPM) 12 include a module controller and one or more battery cells, and a larger power packs include several BPM as shown in FIG. 1. Inputs of the BPM are in operative communication with the controller 13 and can include a cell voltage input 30, a temperature sensor voltage input 32, a current monitor 41, a pressure sensor voltage input 34, and a sensor 35. The Smart Management Module (SMM) sends BPM data (e.g., voltage, temp and status), other BMP related data to a remote server or the device (i.e., each BPM includes battery cells, and battery cells voltage, battery cells temperature, and battery cells status data are acquired and sent to a remote server. The SMM or information processing unit sends or transmits battery cells voltage, temperature, and status data to a remote server. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would be able to select and transmit battery cells voltage or battery cells temperature or a portion of the battery unit information obtained based on the battery pack information to a remote server, as needed – emphasis added by Examiner)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Wright into Takeda for the purpose of defining a smart battery system providing detailed feedback, flexible configurations, and upgrades in order to allow for selective diagnosis, repair or replacement of bad individual cells. This combination would improve in discarding only the few bad battery cells so that unnecessary costs can be reduced and contribution to waste can be prevented. As to claim 5, the combination of Takeda and Wright teaches the claimed limitations as discussed in claim 1. Takeda does not explicitly teach wherein the server is operable to transmit to the user terminal only a portion of the battery unit information received from the information processing unit. Wright teaches wherein the server is operable to transmit to the user terminal only a portion of the battery unit information received from the information processing unit (FIG. 3 and [0066] disclose “the controller 100 can sample the BPM pack to retrieve pack voltage, temperatures and current data (i.e., the information processing unit receive the battery unit information such as voltage, temperature and current data – emphasis added by Examiner) at step 152.”; [0016] discloses a software application, or hardware logic, installed on a personal computer, a mobile device, or a remote server can communicate through a wired or wireless interface with the Smart Management Module (SMM), or the Battery Pack Modules (BPM) terminal to provide useful information to the user (i.e., a software application installed on a remote server can communicate to provide the battery unit information to the user terminal. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would be able to select and transmit a portion of the battery unit information obtained based on the battery pack information, as needed – emphasis added by Examiner), dealer, repair center and/or manufacturer). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Wright into Takeda for the purpose of defining a smart battery system providing detailed feedback, flexible configurations, and upgrades in order to allow for selective diagnosis, repair or replacement of bad individual cells. This combination would improve in discarding only the few bad battery cells so that unnecessary costs can be reduced and contribution to waste can be prevented. As to claim 6, the combination of Takeda and Wright teaches the claimed limitations as discussed in claim 5. Takeda does not explicitly teach when the server receives a request from the user terminal to transmit contents of the battery unit information that has not been transmitted to the user terminal, the server is operable to transmit the requested contents of the battery unit information to the user terminal. Wright teaches when the server receives a request from the user terminal to transmit contents of the battery unit information that has not been transmitted to the user terminal, the server is operable to transmit the requested contents of the battery unit information to the user terminal ([0016] and [0087] disclose a software application, or hardware logic, installed on a remote server can communicate with the Smart Management Module (SMM), or the Battery Pack Modules (BPM) terminal to provide useful information to the user; and the SMM 14 can receive a command 200 from an external user software application and device 23a, 23b, or 23c via USB from a personal computer, Bluetooth from a mobile or like device, or Ethernet or other internet connection from a cloud server at port 21. The external user command 200 can include a myriad of send, store/save, and configuration commands for the system 10, and the command can include a request 200a for the SMM to send 8PM data (e.g., voltage, temp and status), a request 200b for the 8PM fault records, a request 200c for the 8PM health information or status (e.g., SOH) (i.e., a software application installed on a remote server can communicate to provide the battery unit information to the user terminal, and the SMM 14 can receive a command 200 from an external user software application device 23a, 23b, or 23c via USB from Ethernet or other internet connection from a cloud server at port 21, and the command can include a request 200a for the SMM to send BPM data of voltage, temp and status, and health information or status (e.g., SOH). Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would be able to select and transmit contents of the battery unit information that has not been transmitted to the user terminal as the server is operable to transmit the requested contents of the battery unit information to the user terminal – emphasis added by Examiner)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Wright into Takeda for the purpose of defining a smart battery system providing detailed feedback, flexible configurations, and upgrades in order to allow for selective diagnosis, repair or replacement of bad individual cells. This combination would improve in discarding only the few bad battery cells so that unnecessary costs can be reduced and contribution to waste can be prevented. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takeda (EP 2645515 A2, hereinafter Takeda) in view of Wright et al. (US 20150295430, hereinafter Wright), and further in view of Jung et al. (KR 101416798 B1 hereinafter Jung). As to claim 8, Takeda teaches an information processing unit to obtain battery pack information representing a status of the plurality of battery packs and obtain battery unit information representing a status of the battery unit based on the obtained battery pack information (FIG. 2 and [0014] disclose “cell control unit (CCU) 210 collects battery information such as current information, voltage information, temperature information, state of charge (i.e., obtain battery unit information such as current, voltage, temperature, and SOC representing a status of the battery unit – emphasis added by Examiner) and the like of the battery cells of the battery cell groups 20, and a battery module control unit (BMCU) 31.”; [0015] discloses “The battery pack 40 includes the plural battery modules 30 and the battery pack control unit 230. The battery pack control unit 230 collects the battery information outputted from each of the battery module control units 31”). Takeda does not explicitly teach a server to receive the battery unit information transmitted from the information processing unit and transmit at least a portion of the received battery unit information to a user terminal; wherein the information processing unit is configured to transmit to the server (1) only the battery unit information and not the battery pack information. Wright teaches a server to receive the battery unit information transmitted from the information processing unit and transmit at least a portion of the received battery unit information to a user terminal ([0015] discloses “The SMM can receive pack voltage, pack current, temperature, pressure sensor data”; [0016] discloses a software application, or hardware logic, installed on a personal computer, a mobile device, or a remote server can communicate through a wired or wireless interface with the Smart Management Module (SMM), or the Battery Pack Modules (BPM) terminal to provide useful information to the user (i.e., a software application installed on a remote server can communicate to provide the battery unit information to the user terminal – emphasis added by Examiner), dealer, repair center and/or manufacturer. The SMM can receive commands from the user connection to send, store/save, and configure operating limits and parameters for the system); wherein the information processing unit is configured to transmit to the server (1) only the battery unit information and not the battery pack information ([0012], [0052], and [0087] disclose each Battery Pack Module (BPM) 12 include a module controller and one or more battery cells, and a larger power packs include several BPM as shown in FIG. 1. Inputs of the BPM are in operative communication with the controller 13 and can include a cell voltage input 30, a temperature sensor voltage input 32, a current monitor 41, a pressure sensor voltage input 34, and a sensor 35. The Smart Management Module (SMM) sends BPM data (e.g., voltage, temp and status), other BMP related data to a remote server or the device (i.e., each BPM includes battery cells, and battery cells voltage, battery cells temperature, and battery cells status data are acquired and sent to a remote server. The SMM or information processing unit sends or transmits battery cells voltage, temperature, and status data to a remote server. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would be able to select and transmit battery cells voltage or battery cells temperature or a portion of the battery unit information obtained based on the battery pack information to a remote server, as needed. Moreover, Wright does not explicitly teach that the battery pack information is transmitted to a server – emphasis added by Examiner)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Wright into Takeda for the purpose of defining a smart battery system providing detailed feedback, flexible configurations, and upgrades in order to allow for selective diagnosis, repair or replacement of bad individual cells. This combination would improve in discarding only the few bad battery cells so that unnecessary costs can be reduced and contribution to waste can be prevented. Takeda does not explicitly teach the information processing unit is configured to selectively transmit to the server (2) both the battery unit information and the battery pack information. Jung teaches the information processing unit is configured to selectively transmit to the server (2) both the battery unit information and the battery pack information (Page 4, Lines 18-23 discloses transmitting the received information of the battery cell and the information of the battery pack unit to the master battery management unit; and transmitting the information to an energy management server (i.e., the master battery management unit or the information processing unit or the controller transmitted both the battery unit information and the battery pack information to the server - emphasis added by Examiner)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Jung into Takeda in view of Wright for the purpose of minimizing data transmission in a hierarchical structure and thereby preventing communication load and manage batteries and prepare countermeasures in case of emergency or expansion in order to improve in administration of the battery pack unit, and easy effect in maintenance and repair. This combination would improve in identifying the presence of defects, damage in each battery cell so that a deterioration of the overall system of the battery pack unit can be avoided. By combining Wright’s SMM or information processing unit that sends or transmits battery cells voltage, temperature, and status data to a remote server, with Jung’s master battery management unit or the information processing unit or the controller that transmitted both the battery unit information and the battery pack information to the server, the information processing unit would selectively transmit to the server (1) only the battery unit information and not the battery pack information, and (2) both the battery unit information and the battery pack information. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAL CE MANG whose telephone number is (571)272-0370. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday- 8:30-12:00, 1:00-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Catherine T Rastovski can be reached at (571) 270-0349. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAL CE MANG/Examiner, Art Unit 2857
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 02, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595643
LIQUID FLOW PROCESSING FOR PLUMBING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584971
BATTERY MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, BATTERY MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584968
METHOD FOR MONITORING THE STATE OF A REDOX FLOW BATTERY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12553954
BATTERY STATE DETERMINATION METHOD AND BATTERY STATE DETERMINATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12517184
INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND CHARGE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 174 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month