Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/117,178

ROBOTIC BUTLER EVENT DEPLOYMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 03, 2023
Examiner
JUNG, JAEWOOK
Art Unit
3656
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Truist Bank
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
33%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 33% of cases
33%
Career Allow Rate
1 granted / 3 resolved
-18.7% vs TC avg
Strong +100% interview lift
Without
With
+100.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
30
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 3 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on November 14, 2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment This Office Action is in response to the application filed on November 14, 2025. Claims 1, 3-8, 10-15, and 17-20 are pending and addressed below. Response to Arguments Applicant’s amendments have introduced new matter in the 35 USC 112(a) rejection below. Though current amendments have overcome the prior art of record, examiner notes that amendments to overcome the rejection under 35 USC 112(a) may result in a claim rejected by the previously presented prior art rejection of US20210304559A1 (Cupersmith) in view of US20110119226A1 (Ruhl) and US20210304559A1 (Cupersmith) in view of US20110119226A1 (Ruhl) and (Shaw). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 3-8, 10-15, and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding independent claims 1, 8, and 15, applicant has amended the claim to read “generating a threshold amount based on a set of parameters associated with the entertainment event, wherein the set of parameters comprise a location of the entertainment event and a distance between a location corresponding to a central base of robotic butler deployment and the location of the entertainment event, wherein the threshold amount generated is greater when the distance between the location corresponding to the central base of robotic butler deployment and the location of the entertainment event is greater”. However, there is no original disclosure for “wherein the threshold amount generated is greater when the distance between the location corresponding to the central base of robotic butler deployment and the location of the entertainment event is greater”. Applicant’s specification refers to “the threshold amount 316 can be reduced when the distance between and the centralized base of operations for robotic butler deployment is less than a predetermined deployment radius” ([0033]). However, examiner notes that the reduction of the threshold amount based on the listed variables is only behavior described in the context of being “less” than an amount. The specification does not contain any language of what happens to the threshold amount when the distance between is greater nor does it indicate any form of direct proportionality with respect to the distance between. Therefore, there does not exist support for the limitation in the specification. Dependent claims 3-7, 10-14, and 17-20 are also rejected as they are dependent to the independent claims above respectively. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US20170227962 (Cesarano) discloses a collision avoidance system of unmanned vehicles where the difference between a planned position and current position is compared with a threshold value based on parameters such as position and distance. US9796091B1 (Soo) discloses a selective robot deployment system that comprises both context dependent deployment and a system of monitoring a user’s social network, actions, and activities. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAEWOOK JUNG whose telephone number is (571)272-5470. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wade Miles can be reached on (571) 270-7777. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.J./Examiner, Art Unit 3656 /WADE MILES/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 03, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 08, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 08, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 18, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Nov 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12514149
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPRAYING SEEDS DISPENSED FROM A HIGH-SPEED PLANTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12480561
VEHICLE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 2 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
33%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+100.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 3 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month