Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/126,852

HEAT TRANSFER FLUID FOR THERMAL MANAGEMENT, THERMAL MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND BATTERY THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 27, 2023
Priority
Jan 06, 2023 — TW 112100588
Examiner
LING, FOR K.
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
243 granted / 452 resolved
-16.2% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
493
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
53.3%
+13.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 452 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/21/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13, 14, 16, 17 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (CN 102231448 A) in view of Hong (US PGPub No. 2008/0302998) and Hayashi (US PGPub No. 2016/0273852). Regarding claim 13, Wang discloses a battery thermal management system (Figs. 1 and 2), comprising: a battery container (body 5 that contains battery cells 6); a pulsating heat pipe disposed in the battery container (pulsating heat pipe 1); and a heat transfer fluid provided in the pulsating heat pipe (working fluid 2). Wang fails to disclose the heat transfer fluid comprising: a liquid carrier; and a gas generation substance distributed in the liquid carrier, wherein the gas generation substance comprises nanomaterial. wherein the gas generation substance comprises a first nanomaterial and a second nanomaterial, and wherein the first nanomaterial comprises at least one of graphene and carbon black, the second nanomaterial is metal oxide nanomaterial or silicon nanomaterial, and a mass percentage concentration of the first nanomaterial in the heat transfer fluid is greater than a mass percentage concentration of the second nanomaterial in the heat transfer fluid. Hong discloses a heat transfer fluid (a hydrophilic nanofluid in Example 2, paragraph 0094) comprising: a liquid carrier (deionized water); and a gas generation substance (SWNT and MgO nanoparticles, they are the “gas generation substance” as taught by Hayashi below) distributed in the liquid carrier, wherein the gas generation substance comprises nanomaterial (the nanoparticles); wherein the gas generation substance comprises a first nanomaterial (SWNT) and a second nanomaterial (MgO), and wherein the first nanomaterial comprises at least one of graphene and carbon black (the SWNT has a structure of a single graphene sheet rolled into a seamless cylinder, paragraph 0004), the second nanomaterial is metal oxide nanomaterial or silicon nanomaterial (the MgO is a metal oxide), and a mass percentage concentration of the first nanomaterial in the heat transfer fluid is greater than a mass percentage concentration of the second nanomaterial in the heat transfer fluid (the weight percentage is 0.033% of the SWNT more than 0.017% of the MgO). Hyashi discloses a mixed working fluid circulating in the fluid loop in Fig. 3 evaporates and condenses. The mixed working fluid has a pure water and additives mixed, and the additives are, for example, SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, and other ceramic nanoparticles, Au, Ag, Cu, Ti, and other metal nanoparticles, and graphene, fullerene, carbon nanotubes, and other nanoparticles (paragraph 0039). The additive particles (solidification nuclei) act as boiling nuclei and an effect of promotion of heat conduction is obtained (paragraph 0045 of Hayashi). Therefore, the hydrophilic nanofluid of Hong may be used as the working fluid 2 in Wang’s pulsating heat pipe 1. The hydrophilic nanofluid of Hong has a gas generation substance (the SWNT and MgO nanoparticles) that as boiling nuclei as taught by Hyashi to improve evaporative performance and to increase heat conduction of the working fluid. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the heat transfer fluid comprising: a liquid carrier; and a gas generation substance distributed in the liquid carrier, wherein the gas generation substance comprises nanomaterial. wherein the gas generation substance comprises a first nanomaterial and a second nanomaterial, and wherein the first nanomaterial comprises at least one of graphene and carbon black, the second nanomaterial is metal oxide nanomaterial or silicon nanomaterial, and a mass percentage concentration of the first nanomaterial in the heat transfer fluid is greater than a mass percentage concentration of the second nanomaterial in the heat transfer fluid in Wang as taught by Hong and Hayashi in order to act as boiling nuclei as a result of adding the nanoparticles (of Hong) to improve evaporative performance and to increase heat conduction (paragraph 0045 of Hayashi). Regarding claim 14, Wang as modified in claim 13 further discloses wherein an evaporation section of the pulsating heat pipe is located in the battery container (evaporating end of the heat pipe 1 is set in the box body 5, see paragraph 0017 of the translation), and the evaporation section is submerged in a coolant in the battery container (evaporating end is submerged in phase change material 3 in the body 5). Regarding claim 16, Wang as modified in claim 13 further discloses wherein the pulsating heat pipe is located between two inner side walls of the battery container (left and right side inner walls of the box 5 in Figs. 1 and 2), and an evaporation section of the pulsating heat pipe is located in the battery container (evaporating end of the heat pipe 1 is set in the box body 5, see paragraph 0017 of the translation); wherein a dimensionless spacing between the two inner side walls is L', which is defined as a ratio of a distance between the two inner side walls to a diameter of the pulsating heat pipe (a ratio between the left and right side inner walls; and a diameter of the heat pipe shown in Fig. 2), a number of bend at the evaporation section is Ne (Ne = 3 for 3 turns in the evaporating end), and the following condition is satisfied: Ne<= L'/2 (the number Ne of 3 turns is vastly smaller than half of the L’, since the L’ is very large as a result of a very small diameter of the heat pipe 1 shown in Fig. 2). Regarding claim 17, Wang as modified in claim 13 further discloses wherein the pulsating heat pipe is located between two inner side walls of the battery container (left and right side inner walls of the box 5 in Figs. 1 and 2), and a condensation section of the pulsating heat pipe protrudes out of the battery container (condensing end of the heat pipe 1 passes through outside a cover 4 of the box body 5, see paragraph 0017 of the translation and Fig. 1); wherein a dimensionless spacing between the two inner side walls is L', which is defined as a ratio of a distance between the two inner side walls to a diameter of the pulsating heat pipe (a ratio between the left and right side inner walls; and a diameter of the heat pipe shown in Fig. 2), a number of bend at the condensation section is Nc (Nc = 3 for 3 U turns or bends in the condensing end), and the following condition is satisfied: Nc<= L'/2 (the number Nc of 3 turns is vastly smaller than half of the L’, since the L’ is very large as a result of a very small diameter of the heat pipe 1 shown in Fig. 2). Regarding claim 19, Wang as modified in claim 13 further discloses wherein a mass percentage concentration of the gas generation substance in the heat transfer fluid for thermal management ranges from 0.05 wt% to 1.2 wt% (the SWNT and MgO weight percentage in the Example 2 of Hong is 0.033+0.017=0.05%). Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (CN 102231448 A) in view of Hong (US PGPub No. 2008/0302998) and Hayashi (US PGPub No. 2016/0273852) as applied to claim 13 above, and further in view of Jeong (KR 10-2012-0042403 A). Regarding claim 15, Wang fails to explicitly disclose a heat sink in thermal contact with the pulsating heat pipe. Jeong discloses a heat sink (heat dissipation unit 40) in thermal contact with the pulsating heat pipe (in thermal with the condensing portion 21c of the heat pipe 21). Therefore, a heat dissipation unit 40 may be provided to the condensing portion of the heat pipe external the body 5 in Wang. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided a heat sink in thermal contact with the pulsating heat pipe in Wang as taught by Jeong in order to dissipate heat from the condensation portion. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 13 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument (the teaching of relative proportions of the first and second nanomaterials in the new reference, Hong US 2008/0302998). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FOR K LING whose telephone number is (571)272-8752. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 10 am to 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jianying Atkisson can be reached at 571-270-7740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIANYING C ATKISSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3763 /F.K.L/Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 02, 2026
Response Filed
May 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702003
HEAT RADIATION COMPONENT AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693078
HIGH ENTHALPY THERMOCHEMICAL ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687343
DOUBLE PLATE HEAT EXCHANGER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680766
HEAT EXCHANGER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679167
VEHICLE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+18.8%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 452 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month