Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/131,267

SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE WITH PASSIVATED FULL DEEP-TRENCH ISOLATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 05, 2023
Examiner
NARAGHI, ALI
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Omnivision Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
666 granted / 771 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
61.6%
+21.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 771 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of the claims 7-14 in the reply filed on 02/27/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that these invention are related to each other. This is not found persuasive because the invention 1 has passivation structure and invention 3 has material having negative fixed charge which would make these groups mutually exclusive from invention 2. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7,9,13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsai et al (US Pub No. 20200020725), in view of Chen et al (US Pub No. 20180166475). With respect to claim 7, Tsai et al discloses an image sensor (Fig.3) including a semiconductor substrate (210) having a first surface (next to 230) and a second surface that is opposite the first surface (next to 214), the image sensor comprising: a pixel array (Fig.3) having a plurality of pixels (220) disposed on the semiconductor substrate (Fig.3);a plurality of trenches in the semiconductor substrate arranged within the pixel array separating adjacent pixels (270,290), each of the plurality of trenches extending from the first surface (Fig.3) into the semiconductor substrate forming a first opening proximate to the first surface (Fig.3) and a second opening proximate to the second surface (Fig.3); and a first material layer (284) disposed on the second surface (Fig.3), the first material layer continuously lining the second surface (Fig.3) and a plurality of sidewall surfaces of the plurality of trenches (Fig.3). However, Tsai et al does not explicitly disclose wherein the first opening has a width greater than that of the second opening. On the other hand, Chen et al discloses wherein the first opening (103 surface 130, FIg.3H) has a width greater than that of the second opening (near 102b). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the invention to modify Tsai et al according to the teachings of the Chen et al such that the first opening has a width greater than that of the second opening, in order to etch the trench from the first surface; thereby increasing the process speed by maximizing the process on the first surface. With respect to claim 9, Tsai et al in view of Chen et al discloses wherein the plurality of sidewall surfaces are formed from the first surface of the semiconductor substrate (Chen et al Fig.3A-3C) and a distance that each of the plurality of trenches extends into the semiconductor substrate is equal to a substrate thickness of the semiconductor substrate (Tsai et al, Fig.3). With respect to claim 13, Tsai et al discloses wherein the first material layer (214) is in contact with a dielectric layer (230, para 15) disposed on the first surface (Fig.3). With respect to claim 14, Tsai et al discloses further comprising a circuit layer that includes a multi- layer interconnection structure embedded in the dielectric layer (230,para 15) . Claim(s) 8,10-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsai et al (US Pub No. 20200020725), in view of Chen et al (US Pub No. 20180166475), in view of Chaing et al (US Pub No. 20170133414). With respect to claim 8, the arts cited above do not explicitly disclose wherein the first material layer is a high-K dielectric material layer. On the other hand, Chiang et al discloses wherein the first material layer is a high-K dielectric material layer (107,Fig.10, para 20). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the invention to modify the arts cited above according to the Chiang et al such that the first material is made from high dielectric layer in order to decrease the cross talk between pixels; therefore, improving the picture quality. With respect to claim 10, Chen et al discloses wherein each of the trenches having a width (Fig.1I) decreasing with an increasing distance from the first surface toward the second surface (Fig.1I); however, the arts cited above do not explicitly disclose wherein the plurality of trenches is interconnected forming a trench grid separating the plurality of pixels. On the other hand, Chiang et al discloses wherein the plurality of trenches (108,110,Fig.1) is interconnected forming a trench grid (Fig.1) separating the plurality of pixels (104). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the invention to modify the arts cited above according to the teachings of the Chiang et al such that isolation trenches make a grid structure to completely isolate the pixels from one another to decrease crosstalk between the pixels. With respect to claim 11, the arts cited above do not explicitly disclose further comprising a second material layer disposed on the first material layer, the second material layer continuously lining the second surface and the plurality of sidewall surfaces of the plurality of trenches. On the other hand, Chiang et al discloses a second material layer (109) disposed on the first material layer (107), the second material layer continuously lining the second surface and the plurality of sidewall surfaces of the plurality of trenches(Fig.11). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the invention to modify the arts cited above according to the teachings Chiang et al such that a second material layer disposed on the first material layer, the second material layer continuously lining the second surface and the plurality of sidewall surfaces of the plurality of trenches, in order to decrease diffusion of the trench material into the substrate; therefore, decreasing device defect. With respect to claim 12, Chiang et al discloses the second material layer having a different material composition than that of the first material layer (Para 20). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALI N NARAGHI whose telephone number is (571)270-5720. The examiner can normally be reached 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon Fletcher can be reached at 571-272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALI NARAGHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604552
CONTACT ETCH STOP LAYER FOR A PIXEL SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604748
CAPACITOR PADS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604553
IMAGE SENSORS INCLUDING PIXEL ISOLATION STRUCTURE INCLUDING DOUBLE TRENCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604775
SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP AND SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598828
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 771 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month