Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/132,336

Co-Packaging Assembly and Method for Attaching Photonic Dies/Modules to Multi-Chip Active/Passive Substrate

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 07, 2023
Examiner
LEPISTO, RYAN A
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Chipletz Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1031 granted / 1173 resolved
+19.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1202
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1173 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions No claims are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected inventions or species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 7/21/25. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the rejected claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, 6, 8 and 21-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Raghunathan et al (US 10,872,854 B2). Raghunathan teaches: 1/21/25. An integrated circuit package assembly (Fig. 1a-c), comprising: a multichip package substrate (Interposer RDL, PIC, Via Interposer, Switch RDL) comprising a plurality of active and/or passive circuit devices (105, 130, 135) embedded in one or more substrate core layers (105) sandwiched between a first redistribution line stack (Switch RDL) and a second redistribution line stack (Interposer RDL) wherein the plurality of active and/or passive circuit devices (105, 130, 135) comprises an integrated circuit die for implementing a photonic functionality (C4 L63-67, C5 L10-44); a plurality of integrated circuit devices (122 – Switch ASIC 1, Switch ASIC 2) attached to the first redistribution line stack (Switch RDL) on the multichip package substrate (Interposer RDL, PIC, Via Interposer, Switch RDL); and an optical waveguide fiber (part of 140) connected to a photonic integrated circuit device (105) that is located in the multichip package substrate (Interposer RDL, PIC, Via Interposer, Switch RDL), where the optical waveguide fiber (part of 140) is optically coupled to an exposed fiber coupling region (part of 105) of the photonic integrated circuit device (105) (C6 L43-60, C8 L1-33); wherein the plurality of active and/or passive circuit devices (105, 130, 135) is positioned for alignment with the plurality of integrated circuit devices (122 – Switch ASIC 1/2) such that a first integrated circuit device (either ASIC 1 or 2) from the plurality of integrated circuit devices (122) has a shadow within which at least one underlying active and/or passive circuit device (130, 135) is located (see Fig. 1c, the Switch ASICs overlap all 130/135 in the plan view, C5 L15-21). 5/6/22/23. The integrated circuit package of claim 1/21, where the photonic integrated circuit device (105) is attached as a face-down photonic integrated circuit device in the plurality of integrated circuit devices (105/130/135), where the face-down photonic integrated circuit device (105) extends laterally past a side/cutout of the multichip package substrate (past a side of Switch RDL, which forms a “cutout”, see Fig. 1a) so that the exposed fiber coupling region (part of 105) is positioned for edge coupling (top edge) attachment to the optical waveguide fiber (part of 140). 8/24. The integrated circuit package of claim 1, where the plurality of integrated circuit devices (105, 130, 135) comprises an encapsulated plurality of integrated circuit devices attached to the first redistribution line stack (Switch RDL) of the multichip package substrate (Interposer RDL, PIC, Via Interposer, Switch RDL) (C8 L60 – C9 L5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN A LEPISTO whose telephone number is (571)272-1946. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hollweg can be reached at 571-270-1739. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN A LEPISTO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Sep 30, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 12, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678987
OPTICAL FIBER CUTTING DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674948
Optically Bridged Multicomponent Package with Extended Temperature Range
11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674949
Optically Bridged Multicomponent Package with Extended Temperature Range
11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663581
ANALOG MEMORY FOR PHOTONIC CIRCUITS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656548
OPTICAL FIBER ARRANGEMENT METHOD, OPTICAL FIBER FUSION SPLICING METHOD, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OPTICAL FIBER RIBBON WITH CONNECTOR, AND INTERMITTENTLY CONNECTED OPTICAL FIBER RIBBON
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.2%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1173 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month