Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/134,353

HEMT PACKAGE WITH BOND WIRE-FREE CONNECTIONS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Apr 13, 2023
Examiner
LEE, EUGENE
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
728 granted / 891 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
930
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 891 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention II, Species I (claims 12-17) in the reply filed on 1/9/26 is acknowledged. Claims 1-11, and 18-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/9/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In line 4 of claim 17, the applicant states the limitation “mounting one or more vertical connection elements”; however, the limitation “vertical connection elements” appears to be a restating of the “metal package terminals” stated in line 7 of claim 12, rather than a “further comprising” in line 1 as stated in claim 17. Appropriate clarification and/or correction are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. In view of the 112 rejection above, claim(s) 12, and 15 thru 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lin US 2020/0043881 A1. Lin discloses (see, for example, FIG. 1C) a method comprising a method of forming a semiconductor package, the method comprising: providing a first metal baseplate 102; providing a first HEMT die 106A comprising a main surface with source 106A1, drain 106A2 and gate terminals 106A3 disposed thereon; mounting the first HEMT die 106A on the first metal baseplate 102 with the main surface from the first HEMT die 106A facing away from first metal baseplate 102; providing a plurality of metal package terminals 116-2/116-3/116-1; electrically connecting each of the source 106A1, drain 106A2 and gate terminals 106A3 from the first HEMT die 106A via a bond wire-free connection to at least one of the metal package terminals 116-2/116-3/116-1; and forming an encapsulant body 110 of electrically insulating material that encapsulates the first HEMT die 106A and exposes outer ends of the metal package terminals 116-2/116-3/116-1 outside of the encapsulant body 110. In paragraph [0015], Lin discloses the first metal baseplate 102 being metal. In paragraph [0016], Lin discloses the first HEMT 106A being HEMT, etc. Regarding claim 15, see, for example, FIG. 1C wherein Lin discloses providing a second HEMT die 106B comprising a main surface with source , drain and gate terminals disposed thereon; and electrically connecting each of the source 106B1, drain 106B2 and gate terminals 106B3 from the second HEMT die 106B via a bond wire-free connection to at least one of the metal package terminals 116-1/116-5/116-4, wherein the encapsulant body 110 is formed to encapsulate the second HEMT die 106B. The outer ends of the metal package terminals 116-1/116-5/116-4 are exposed outside of the encapsulant body 110. Regarding claim 16, see, for example, FIG. 1C wherein Lin discloses mounting the second HEMT die 106B on the first metal baseplate 102 with the main surface from the second HEMT die 106B facing away from the first metal baseplate 102. Regarding claim 17, see, for example, FIG. 1C wherein Lin discloses further comprising: attaching a planar metal plate 114-2/114-3/114-4/114-6/114-7/114-5 to each of the source, drain and gate terminals from the first and second HEMT dies; and mounting one or more vertical connection elements 118-2/118-3/118-1/118-5/118-4/120 on each of the planar metal plates. Also see 112 rejection above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lin US 2020/0043881 A1 as applied to claims 12, 15-17 above, and further in view of Tan US 2016/0284638 A1. Lin does not disclose the first HEMT die comprises a rear surface opposite from the main surface that is electrically inactive, and wherein the rear surface from the first die is directly attached to the first metal baseplate. However, Tan discloses (see, for example, FIG. 1) a method comprising a die 103 directly attached to the first metal baseplate 011. In paragraph [0012], Tan discloses the inactive face is attached to the first metal baseplate 011. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have a rear surface opposite from the main surface that is electrically inactive, and wherein the rear surface from the first die is directly attached to the first metal baseplate in order to utilize less processing time and material, and further minimize thermal resistance and mismatch. Also, it has been held omission of an element and its function in a combination where the remaining elements perform the same function as before involves only routine skill in the art. In re Karlson, 136 USPQ 184. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lin US 2020/0043881 A1 in view of Tan US 2016/0284638 A1 as applied to claim 13 above, and further in view of Piner et al. US 2008/0200013 A1. Lin in view of Tan does not disclose the first HEMT die comprises an active channel region that conducts a lateral load current and an electrically insulating layer disposed between the active channel region and the rear surface that electrically isolates the active channel region from. However, Pine discloses (see, for example, Fig. 3) a method comprising forming a channel layer 18 and an electrically insulating layer 12. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have the first HEMT die comprises an active channel region that conducts a lateral load current and an electrically insulating layer disposed between the active channel region and the rear surface that electrically isolates the active channel region from in order to reduce misfit dislocations, and thereby, minimize defects in the gallium nitride material. INFORMATION ON HOW TO CONTACT THE USPTO Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1733. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 730-330 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA BENITEZ can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Eugene Lee January 18, 2026 /EUGENE LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 13, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593460
MULTI-TIER DEEP TRENCH CAPACITOR AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588397
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY DEVICE, WEARABLE DEVICE, AND DISPLAY METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588194
METHOD FOR PHYSICALLY UNCLONABLE FUNCTION THROUGH GATE HEIGHT TUNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588569
Buried Seam with Kirigami Pattern for 3D Micro LED Display
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581973
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 891 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month