Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/138,967

INSERTION STATE DETERMINATION SYSTEM, INSERTION STATE DETERMINATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Apr 25, 2023
Priority
Jun 27, 2022 — JP 2022-102793
Examiner
HENDERSON, RYAN N
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Evident Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
521 granted / 821 resolved
-6.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
868
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 821 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Amendment The Amendment filed 5/18/2026 has been entered. Claims 1 -14 and 18 are pending in the application with claim 1 amended, claims 15-17 withdrawn, claims 19 and 20 cancelled. The previous 35 USC 112 rejection of claims 1 and 2 have been withdrawn in light of Applicant’s amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “a processor configured to: acquire the first rotation amount and the second rotation amount; and calculate a corrected rotation amount by correcting the first rotation amount based on the second rotation amount” in Lines 11-14, wherein it’s not clear the scope of the invention since the processor appears to only be performing a calculation and fails to tie the result of the calculation back to the sensor unit / endoscope device. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lu et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0246873, hereinafter Lu). In regard to claim 1, Lu discloses an insertion state determination system (2100, Fig. 1), comprising: a sensor unit (2744,2130) including a first sensor (3430) configured to determine a first rotation amount when an elongated insertion unit (2742,2740) of an endoscope device is inserted into a subject (Par. 41), wherein the first rotation amount indicates a rotation amount of the insertion unit around a center axis of the insertion unit, and wherein a hole through which the insertion unit passes is formed in the sensor unit, and wherein the insertion unit is movable relative to the sensor unit (Fig. 4B illustrates an opening within proximal housing (2744) of the sensor unit through which a portion of distal housing (2742) extends to transmit rotation from the gear assembly to the distal housing (2742) and cannula (2740)); a second sensor (3420) that is disposed in the sensor unit or an object fixed to the sensor unit (Fig. 4B) and is configured to determine a second rotation amount indicating a rotation amount of the sensor unit around the center axis when the insertion unit is inserted into the subject (Par. 42-43, wherein the second sensor measures rotation of the entire system (2100) about a longitudinal axis); and a processor configured to: acquire the first rotation amount and the second rotation amount; and calculate a corrected rotation amount by correcting the first rotation amount based on the second rotation amount (Par. 43 teaches of the first and second sensors (3420,3430) are used together to calculate attitude data for maintaining a horizontal view of the image). In regard to claim 18, Lu teaches wherein the processor is configured to calculate the corrected rotation amount by performing addition or subtraction using the first rotation amount and the second rotation amount (Par. 43 teaches of the first and second sensors (3420,3430) are used together to calculate attitude data for maintaining a horizontal view of the image). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-14 and 18 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN N HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-1430. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-5pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN N HENDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3795 July 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
May 18, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702283
MEDICAL INSERTION EQUIPMENT SYSTEM, CAPSULE, AND MEDICAL INSERTION EQUIPMENT DISINFECTION METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12690753
VIDEO ENDOSCOPE WITH FLEXIBLE TIP
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678038
Pannable Endoscope
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672766
Recording Medium, Method for Generating Learning Model, Image Processing Device, and Surgical Operation Assisting System
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12653391
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR REALTIME MONITORING AND CLEANING OF A LAPAROSCOPIC LENS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+18.8%)
4y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 821 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month