Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Evident Corporation

8 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

6
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (6)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
7
Medium (88%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only7 (88%)
§112 only1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
4
Semiconductors
50% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, THONG Q 2 67.6% +11.9%
BEATTY, TY MITCHELL 1 70.0% +46.7%
HENDERSON, RYAN N 1 63.7% +18.2%
PICHLER, MARIN 1 63.6% +8.3%
CHAVEZ, ANTHONY RAY 1 16.7% +100.0%
MACK, RICKY LEVERN 1 31.6% +20.7%
TRUONG, MILTON LARSON 1 61.4% +43.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17851597 MICROSCOPE SIMULATION DEVICE, METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM CHAVEZ, ANTHONY RAY 145d overdue

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17680624 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING PROGRESSION OF DIFFERENTIATION FROM PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS TO PIGMENT-CONTAINING CELLS TRUONG, MILTON LARSON 146d overdue
17851597 MICROSCOPE SIMULATION DEVICE, METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM CHAVEZ, ANTHONY RAY 145d overdue
17748637 OBSERVATION DEVICE MACK, RICKY LEVERN 127d overdue
18115021 OCULAR TUBE NGUYEN, THONG Q 10d overdue
18138967 INSERTION STATE DETERMINATION SYSTEM, INSERTION STATE DETERMINATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM HENDERSON, RYAN N 9d overdue
18387185 THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE, THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM BEATTY, TY MITCHELL 23d
18208992 LENS-BARREL DEVICE AND MICROSCOPE SYSTEM NGUYEN, THONG Q 75d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2872 4
2663 1
3795 1
2186 1
3798 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18387185 THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE, THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM BEATTY, TY MITCHELL 2663 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Nov 06, 2023
18208992 LENS-BARREL DEVICE AND MICROSCOPE SYSTEM NGUYEN, THONG Q 2872 §112 Final Rejection 75d Pending Jun 13, 2023
18138967 INSERTION STATE DETERMINATION SYSTEM, INSERTION STATE DETERMINATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM HENDERSON, RYAN N 3795 §103 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Apr 25, 2023
18136234 MICROSCOPE SYSTEM, PROJECTION UNIT, AND IMAGE PROJECTION METHOD PICHLER, MARIN 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Apr 18, 2023
18115021 OCULAR TUBE NGUYEN, THONG Q 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Feb 28, 2023
17851597 MICROSCOPE SIMULATION DEVICE, METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM CHAVEZ, ANTHONY RAY 2186 §103 Non-Final OA 145d overdue Pending Jun 28, 2022
17748637 OBSERVATION DEVICE MACK, RICKY LEVERN 2872 §103 Final Rejection 127d overdue Pending May 19, 2022
17680624 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING PROGRESSION OF DIFFERENTIATION FROM PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS TO PIGMENT-CONTAINING CELLS TRUONG, MILTON LARSON 3798 §103 Non-Final OA 146d overdue Pending Feb 25, 2022

Managing Evident Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month