Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/140,321

MOTION GENERATION USING ONE OR MORE NEURAL NETWORKS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Apr 27, 2023
Examiner
DOAN, PHUC N
Art Unit
2618
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nvidia Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
191 granted / 253 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 253 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments This is in response to applicant’s amendment/response filed on 09/25/2025, which have been entered and made of record. Claims 1-18 and 25-30 are pending in the application. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-18 and 25-30 have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-18 and 25-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 1, 7, 13 and 25, each recites “generate one or more features to complete one or more portions of a feature map of one or more objects for any view within a 360 degree range” It is unclear to how much of a completion is completed as it can be one or more features for one or more portions of a feature map of one or more objects for any view. Is it one feature for one portion or more portions of the feature map? It is also unclear on how to identify which view contain one or more missing feature maps using the neural networks. Is it identifying by a human user? Is it completed by filling 70%, 80% of the identified missing holes/portions from one or all views of the 360 degree view of the 3D model? Claim 13 recites “A method comprising: causing one or more neural networks to:” It is unclear to what is “causing one or more neural networks to…” All dependent claims are also rejected based on their dependency of the defected parent claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see form PRO-892. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHUC N DOAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3397. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday: 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faulk Devona can be reached on (571) 272-7515. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUC N DOAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 27, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12561913
MESH ZIPPERING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561888
METHOD FOR SIMULATING THE EFFECTS OF THE OPTICAL QUALITY OF WINDSHIELD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12511836
OBJECT SHELLING AND HOLLOWING
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12505608
RAY TRACING CHANNEL MODELING METHOD FOR RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12498575
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPERATING A DISPLAY SYSTEM BASED ON USER PERCEPTIBILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 253 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month