Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/141,427

CONTINGENT CARDIO-PROTECTION FOR EPILEPSY PATIENTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 30, 2023
Priority
Jan 25, 2008 — CIP of 8565867 +9 more
Examiner
HULBERT, AMANDA K
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Flint Hills Scientific LLC
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
642 granted / 760 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
67.5%
+27.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 760 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments regarding the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112 have been considered and are persuasive. Examiner notes that the broadest reasonable interpretation of the claims do not require the sympathetic tone to be increased or decreased specifically with stimulation of the vagus nerve, and the specification finds support for sympathetic tone stimulation in paragraph 177, "the method may comprise reducing the patient's sympathetic tone, such as by applying high-frequency stimulation to a sympathetic nerve trunk or ganglion or administering an anti-cholinergic drug." Therefore, the rejections have been withdrawn. However, upon further search and consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Libbus et al. (US 2006/0253161). This action is NON-FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claims 10, 12, 13, 15-17 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Libbus (US 2006/0253161). Regarding claim 10, Libbus teaches a system for treating a medical condition in a patient, comprising: a sensor for sensing at least one body data stream (e.g. sensors 990 as shown in Figure 9); at least one electrode (e.g. electrodes attached to neural leads 903 as shown in Figure 9); a programmable electrical signal generator (e.g. implantable medical device 910); a heart rate unit capable of determining a heart rate of the patient based on the at least one body data stream (e.g. heart rate sensing circuit 862); and a logic unit configured via one or more processors to compare a monitored value which is determined based on one or more data points relating to the heart rate to one or more threshold values, the logic unit further configured to determine a first triggering event based on the comparison (e.g. stimulation control circuit 336); wherein the one or more processors are configured to initiate one or more actions to change the heart rate of the patient based on the determination of the first triggering event; the one or more processors are configured to via the at least one electrode increase a sympathetic tone or to decrease a sympathetic tone to increase the heart rate of the patient based on the first triggering event via the programmable electrical signal generator (e.g. adjustment of sympathetic stimulation controller 338 based upon the patient’s heart rate as disclosed in [0038]).. Regarding claim 12, Libbus additionally discloses wherein the logic unit is further configured to determine a second triggering event based on the comparison (e.g. the stimulation control unit as disclosed in 336 and 436 work in an iterative fashion, and will thus necessarily receive a second triggering event). Regarding claim 13, Libbus additionally discloses wherein the one or more processors are configured to decrease a sympathetic tone to decrease the heart rate of the patient based on the second triggering event via the programmable electrical signal generator (e.g. decreasing sympathetic when a heart rate exceeds a predetermined threshold as disclosed in [0038]). Regarding claim 15, Libbus additionally discloses wherein the one or more processors are configured to decrease the parasympathetic tone to increase the heart rate of the patient based on the third triggering event via the programmable electrical signal generator (e.g. decreasing the parasympathetic tone to increase the heart rate when the heart rate falls below a predetermined threshold as taught in [0038]). Regarding claim 16, Libbus additionally discloses wherein the logic unit is further configured to determine an Nth triggering event based on the comparison (e.g. the stimulation control unit as disclosed in 336 and 436 work in an iterative fashion, and will thus necessarily receive a Nth triggering event). Regarding claim 17, Libbus additionally discloses wherein the one or more processors are configured to increase the sympathetic tone to increase the heart rate of the patient based on the Nth triggering event via the programmable electrical signal generator (e.g. increase of sympathetic tone to increase heart rate as disclosed in [0038], wherein the stimulation control unit as disclosed in 336 and 436 work in an iterative fashion, and will thus necessarily receive a Nth triggering event). Conclusion Due to the new rejections that were not necessitated by amendment, this action is NON-FINAL. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Amanda K Hulbert whose telephone number is (571)270-1912. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Unsu Jung can be reached at 571-272-8506. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Amanda K Hulbert/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Aug 11, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 19, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Oct 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 11, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678629
5G Implant
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665061
NOCICEPTION EVENT IDENTIFICATION BASED ON A RELATIVE CHANGE IN A NOCICEPTION PARAMETER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654013
MEMORY ENHANCEMENT BY PREFRONTAL DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION SYNCHRONIZED TO MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE DURING SLEEP
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642972
PERIPHERAL NERVE AND SPINAL CORD DIFFERENTIAL TARGET MULTIPLEXED STIMULATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642977
Implantable Medical Device Comprising an Electrical Line Forming an Antenna
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+4.0%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 760 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month