Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Flint Hills Scientific LLC

9 pending office actions • 4 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
4
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
2
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 7 days (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (11%)
6
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
2
Unknown (22%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (11%)
§103 only4 (44%)
§102 only2 (22%)
No statute on record2 (22%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
22% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
78% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BERTRAM, ERIC D 1 81.0% +12.6%
GEDEON, BRIAN T 1 87.3% +7.0%
BERHANU, ETSUB D 1 65.5% +24.5%
MALAMUD, DEBORAH LESLIE 1 78.4% +10.1%
MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 1 50.0% +18.9%
VANNI, GEORGE STEVEN 1 66.8% +24.3%
NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT 1 55.9% +33.6%
PORTER, JR, GARY A 1 68.9% +25.2%
CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY 1 31.4% +30.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18104891 CLASSIFYING SEIZURES AS EPILEPTIC OR NON-EPILEPTIC USING EXTRA-CEREBRAL BODY DATA GEDEON, BRIAN T 84d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17104099 CLASSIFYING SEIZURES AS EPILEPTIC OR NON-EPILEPTIC USING EXTRA-CEREBRAL BODY DATA VANNI, GEORGE STEVEN 6d

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16419327 QUANTITATIVE MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF SEIZURES PORTER, JR, GARY A 203d overdue
17832602 RESPONSIVENESS TESTING OF A PATIENT HAVING BRAIN STATE CHANGES BERHANU, ETSUB D 38d overdue
17372716 PATHOLOGICAL STATE DETECTION USING DYNAMICALLY DETERMINED BODY INDEX RANGE VALUES MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 2d overdue
17098391 SEIZURE DETECTION METHODS, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS USING A WAVELET TRANSFORM MAXIMUM MODULUS ALGORITHM NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT 5d
17104099 CLASSIFYING SEIZURES AS EPILEPTIC OR NON-EPILEPTIC USING EXTRA-CEREBRAL BODY DATA VANNI, GEORGE STEVEN 6d
17681796 CONTINGENT CARDIO-PROTECTION FOR EPILEPSY PATIENTS MALAMUD, DEBORAH LESLIE 30d
18388879 SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATED QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT, OPTIMIZATION AND LOGGING OF THE EFFECTS OF A THERAPY BERTRAM, ERIC D 56d
16015713 PARAMETRIC SEIZURE DETECTION CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY 86d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3796 4
3791 2
1686 2
3792 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18388879 SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATED QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT, OPTIMIZATION AND LOGGING OF THE EFFECTS OF A THERAPY BERTRAM, ERIC D 3796 Other Non-Final OA 56d Pending Nov 13, 2023
18104891 CLASSIFYING SEIZURES AS EPILEPTIC OR NON-EPILEPTIC USING EXTRA-CEREBRAL BODY DATA GEDEON, BRIAN T 3796 §103 Non-Final OA 84d overdue Pending Feb 02, 2023
17832602 RESPONSIVENESS TESTING OF A PATIENT HAVING BRAIN STATE CHANGES BERHANU, ETSUB D 3791 §102 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Jun 04, 2022
17681796 CONTINGENT CARDIO-PROTECTION FOR EPILEPSY PATIENTS MALAMUD, DEBORAH LESLIE 3792 §102 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Feb 27, 2022
17372716 PATHOLOGICAL STATE DETECTION USING DYNAMICALLY DETERMINED BODY INDEX RANGE VALUES MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 3796 Other Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Jul 12, 2021
17104099 CLASSIFYING SEIZURES AS EPILEPTIC OR NON-EPILEPTIC USING EXTRA-CEREBRAL BODY DATA VANNI, GEORGE STEVEN 1686 §101 Final Rejection 6d Pending Nov 25, 2020
17098391 SEIZURE DETECTION METHODS, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS USING A WAVELET TRANSFORM MAXIMUM MODULUS ALGORITHM NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT 1686 §103 Final Rejection 5d Pending Nov 15, 2020
16419327 QUANTITATIVE MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF SEIZURES PORTER, JR, GARY A 3796 §103 Non-Final OA 203d overdue Pending May 22, 2019
16015713 PARAMETRIC SEIZURE DETECTION CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY 3791 §103 Non-Final OA 86d Pending Jun 22, 2018

Managing Flint Hills Scientific LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month