Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/142,600

JUNCTION STRUCTURE ELEMENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 03, 2023
Priority
May 03, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0054606
Examiner
MARUF, SHEIKH
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Research & Business Foundation Sungkyunkwan University
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
473 granted / 545 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
580
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
89.7%
+49.7% vs TC avg
§102
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 545 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 03/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Because layer an insulating layer (400) which is disposed between the semiconductor channel layer (217) and the ferroelectric layer (110) and includes a material having insulating properties (For example, the dielectric film 400 may include at least one of Si oxides, Al oxides, Hf oxides, Zr oxides, and 2D insulators (such as a hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN)). SiO2 is considered insulating film as known to people in the industry). Hence, applicant’s arguments are not persuasive. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 , 4, 5 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jo et al. (US PGpub: 2020/0203498 A1), herein after Jo. Regarding claim 1, Jo teaches a junction structure element comprising: a semiconductor channel layer (217, FIG. 12) which includes a material having ferroelectric (dielectric film 400 may be provided between the ferroelectric film 110 and the substrate 200. The dielectric film 400 may be spaced apart from the first polarization enhancement film 120 by the ferroelectric film 110. For example, the dielectric film 400 may include at least one of Si oxides, Al oxides, Hf oxides, Zr oxides, and 2D insulators (such as a hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN))) and semiconductor properties (217 may include Si, Ge, SiGe, a Group III-V semiconductor, an organic semiconductor, an oxide semiconductor, a nitride semiconductor, an oxynitride semiconductor, a 2D material, a quantum dot, or a combination thereof); a source electrode and a drain electrode (source electrode 215 and the drain electrode 216 in FIG. 12) which are each in contact with the semiconductor channel layer (130, 400 and 217 constitutes channel layer) and are spaced apart from each other (as in FIG 12); a ferroelectric layer (110) which is formed on the semiconductor channel layer (217) and includes a material having ferroelectric properties (Paragraph [0052]); a gate electrode (300) disposed on the ferroelectric layer (110).; and an insulating layer (400, FIG. 12) which is disposed between the semiconductor channel layer (217) and the ferroelectric layer (110) and includes a material having insulating properties (For example, the dielectric film 400 may include at least one of Si oxides, Al oxides, Hf oxides, Zr oxides, and 2D insulators (such as a hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN))). PNG media_image1.png 607 687 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, Jo teaches the junction structure element of claim 2, wherein the insulating layer includes h-BN (For example, the dielectric film 400 may include at least one of Si oxides, Al oxides, Hf oxides, Zr oxides, and 2D insulators (such as a hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN)) in Paragraph [0074]). Regarding claim 5, Jo teaches the junction structure element of claim 1, wherein the semiconductor channel layer and the ferroelectric layer include at least one material each independently differently selected from the group consisting of graphanol, hydroxyl-functionalized graphene, halogen- decorated phosphorene, g-C6N8H, Bi-CH2OH and two-dimensional perovskite including arsenic (As), antimony (Sb), bismuth (Bi), tellurium (Te), d1T-MoS2, t-MoS2, WS2, WSe2, WTe2, BiN, SbN, BiP, α-In₂Se₃, GaN, GaSe, SiC, BN, AIN, ZnO, GeS, GeSe, SnS, SnSe, SiTE, GeTe, SnTE, PbTe, CrN, CrB₂, CrBr₃, Crl₃, GaTeCI, AgBiP₂Se₆, CuCrP₂S₆, CuCrP₂Se₆, CuVP₂S₆, CuVP₂Se₆, CulnP₂Se₆, CulnP₂S₆ (CIPS), Sc₂CO₂, Bi₂O₂Se, Bi₂O₂Te, Bi₂O₂S, Ba₂PbCl₄ (Paragraph [0111], [0078]). Regarding claim 11, Jo teaches the junction structure element of claim 1, wherein the source electrode, the drain, and the gate electrode each include at least one material selected from the group consisting of titanium (Ti) and gold (Au) (Paragraph [0029]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3 and 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jo et al. (US PGpub: 2020/0203498 A1), herein after Jo, in view of known arts in the same field of endeavor. Regarding claim 3, Jo teaches, in view of known arts, the junction structure element of claim 2, wherein the insulating layer has a thickness of 5 nm to 10 nm (see paragraph [0156]-[0007], [0275] in RABKIN et al. (US: 2021/0264959 A1) among other in order to control memory capacity of device so that device functionality can be achieved.). Regarding claim 6, Jo teaches, in view of known arts, the junction structure element of claim 5, wherein: the semiconductor channel layer includes α-In2Se3 or SnS; and the ferroelectric layer includes CIPS (see paragraph [0006]-[0007], [0275] in RABKIN et al. (US: 2021/0264959 A1) among other in order to control memory capacity of device). Regarding claim 7, Jo teaches the junction structure element of claim 1, wherein: a voltage applied between the source electrode and the drain electrode adjusts a degree of polarization in the horizontal direction of the semiconductor channel layer; and a voltage applied to the gate electrode adjusts a degree of polarization in the vertical direction of the ferroelectric layer (The direction of polarization is the intrinsic characteristics of the device. It is somewhat mentioned in Paragraph [0066], [0067], [0071], [0079]. The polarization layer 120 and 130 helps adjusting the degree and direction of polarization in order to improve the reliability of the device. It is also mentioned in Zhu et al. (US 2021/0249539 A1) in ABSTRACT, Paragraph [0005], [0016], [0028]- [0041]), how voltage will be applied in source, drain and gate electrode and how polarization or conductivity of the transistor will be programmed. “The polarity of the transistor 400 was switched from p-type to n-type when voltage applied on the embedded gates is changed from −3V to 3V. These results demonstrate that polarity of a black phosphorus transistor can be switched between pFET and nFET using the local program gates in the source/drain regions.” As stated in Paragraph [0040] in Zhu et al.). Regarding claim 8, Jo teaches, in view of known arts, the junction structure element of claim 7, wherein an increasing or decreasing state of a current conducted in the semiconductor channel layer is determined according to an increasing or decreasing state of a current applied between the source electrode and the drain electrode and an increasing or decreasing state of a current applied to the gate electrode (The direction of polarization is the intrinsic characteristics of the device. It is somewhat mentioned in Paragraph [0066], [0067], [0071], [0079]. The polarization layer 120 and 130 helps adjusting the degree and direction of polarization in order to improve the reliability of the device. It is also mentioned in Zhu et al. (US 2021/0249539 A1) in ABSTRACT, Paragraph [0005], [0016], [0028]- [0041]), how voltage will be applied in source, drain and gate electrode and how polarization or conductivity of the transistor will be programmed. “The polarity of the transistor 400 was switched from p-type to n-type when voltage applied on the embedded gates is changed from −3V to 3V. These results demonstrate that polarity of a black phosphorus transistor can be switched between pFET and nFET using the local program gates in the source/drain regions.” As stated in Paragraph [0040] in Zhu et al.). Regarding claim 9, Jo teaches, in view of known arts, the junction structure element of claim 7, wherein current conductivity of the semiconductor channel layer is determined according to a pulse of the voltage applied between the source electrode and the drain electrode and a pulse of the voltage applied to the gate electrode (t. Regarding claim 10, Jo teaches, in view of known arts, the junction structure element of claim 1, wherein: the semiconductor channel layer has a thickness of 40 nm to 60 nm; and the ferroelectric layer has a thickness of 60 nm 100 nm (Channel thickness mentioned in Zhu et al. (US 2021/0249539 A1) in Paragraph [0038] or in RABKIN et al. (US: 2021/0264959 A1) in Paragraph [0097], the channel thickness can be adjusted based on device need to meet the current limitations to meet device functionality). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEIKH MARUF whose telephone number is (571)270-1903. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-6pm EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached at 571-270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEIKH MARUF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 19, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 11, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641809
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635143
Three-Dimensional Memory Device and Method
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628381
WAKEUP-FREE FERROELECTRIC MEMORY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12610670
LAMP BEAD AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604479
TWO TRANSISTOR CAPACITORLESS MEMORY CELL WITH STACKED THIN-FILM TRANSISTORS
4y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month