Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/143,168

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FRONT-END MODULE FILTERING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 04, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, KHIEM D
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Skyworks Solutions Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1872 granted / 2187 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
2260
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2187 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/10/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The examiner respectfully traverses applicant’s arguments and made this action Final. Applicant argues: Applicant submits that “The rejection of claim 1 is improper at least because the Office Action is silent as to the limitation, "the inverter being configured to provide output impedance matching to the one or more power amplifiers." (Office Action, 4). Although the Office Action relies on the transformer 64 of Ji for an alleged teaching of the "inverter" of claim 1, the Office Action is silent as to the quoted limitation of claim 1. Furthermore, Applicant respectfully notes that while Ji discloses that the transformer 64 is coupled to the transistors Q3, Q4, Ji does not disclose that the transformer 64 is configured to provide impedance matching to the transistors Q3, Q4”. Examiner respectfully disagrees all of the allegations as argued. Examiner, in his previous office action, gave detail explanation of claimed limitation and pointed out exact locations in the cited prior art. In response to applicant's argument, examiner respectfully submits that: With respect to the applicant’s arguments, Ji et al. clearly disclosed in Fig. 1, an inverter (e.g., quarter-wave transformer 64, paragraph [0040], which is capable of provide impedance matching, commonly known in the art, see reference US 20060164163 A1, paragraph [0031] which states “(impedance inverter 160 matches the impedance” and paragraph [0033] which states “a quarter-wavelength transmission line”, it is noted that ) coupled between the one or more power amplifiers and the balun (120), the inverter providing output impedance matching to the one or more power amplifiers. It is noted that the quarter-wave transformer 64 having similarly arrangement to the inverter 208 of the applicant’s Fig. 8, for the reasons above, the examiner believe the reference of Ji et al. read on the claimed invention as cited in claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ji et al. (US 2023/0291359 A1, of record, us-provisional-application US 63318504 20220310), hereinafter Ji. PNG media_image1.png 773 997 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Ji (Figs. 1 & 15, [0069] which states “various types of wireless communication devices and [0046] “front-end module”) discloses a front-end module (transmit circuitry 148 of Fig. 15 that include Doherty power amplifier 10) comprising: an input (port 24 of Fig. 1) configured to receive a radio-frequency signal (signal RFIN of Fig. 1); an output (ANT port 16) configured to be coupled to an antenna (e.g., antenna 154 as shown in Fig. 15); a balun (Balun 120 of Fig. 1) coupled to the output (ANT port 16); one or more power amplifiers (power amplifiers includes transistors Q3 and Q4 of Fig. 1) coupled to the input; and an inverter (e.g., quarter-wave transformer 64, paragraph [0049], which is capable of provide impedance matching, for instant see reference US 20060164163 A1, paragraph [0031] which states “(impedance inverter 160 matches the impedance” and paragraph [0033] which states “a quarter-wavelength transmission line”, it is noted that ) coupled between the one or more power amplifiers and the balun (120), the inverter providing output impedance matching to the one or more power amplifiers. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The most relevant prior art reference is Ji et al. (US 20230291359 A1, of record) as discussed above. However, Ji et al. does not teach: in regards to claim 2, wherein the inverter includes a first differential input and a second differential input coupled to the one or more power amplifiers, and a first differential output and a second differential output coupled to the balun; in regards to claim 11, wherein the balun includes a center tap, the front-end module further comprising a balun matching network coupled to the center tap of the balun. Therefore, the applicant’s claimed invention has been determine to be novel and non-obvious. By virtue of dependency from claims 2 & 11, claims 3-10 & 12-16, respectively, have also been determine to be novel and non-obvious. Ji et al. does not teach: in regards to claim 17, further comprising a first power-amplifier balun and a second power-amplifier balun, the one or more power amplifiers including at least one first power amplifier coupled to the first power-amplifier balun and at least one second power amplifier coupled to the second power-amplifier balun. Therefore, the applicant’s claimed invention has been determine to be novel and non-obvious. Claims 21-23 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The most relevant prior art reference is Ji et al. (US 20230291359 A1, of record) as discussed above. However, Ji et al. does not teach: in regards to claim 21, the inverter providing output impedance matching to the one or more power amplifiers and including a first differential input and a second differential input coupled to the one or more power amplifiers, and a first differential output and a second differential output coupled to the balun; in regards, claim 22, the inverter providing output impedance matching to the one or more power amplifiers; and a balun matching network coupled to the center tap of the balun; in regards, claim 23, a second power-amplifier balun, the one or more power amplifiers including at least one first power amplifier coupled to the first power-amplifier balun and at least one second power amplifier coupled to the second power-amplifier balun. Therefore, the applicant’s claimed invention has been determine to be novel and non-obvious. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHIEM D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3941. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00 AM-5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANDREA J LINDGREN BALTZELL can be reached at (571)272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHIEM D NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 04, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603626
MULTI-PHASE-BASED DOHERTY POWER AMPLIFIER METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599329
Sense Amplifer For a Physiological Sensor and/or Other Sensors
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599000
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING FIRST AND SECOND MONITORING CHANNEL STRUCTURES AND NON-VOLATILE MEMORY SYSTEM COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12599018
PACKAGE STRUCTURE WITH ENHANCEMENT STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592674
SELF-BIAS SIGNAL GENERATING CIRCUIT USING DIFFERENTIAL SIGNAL AND RECEIVER INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 2187 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month