Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/147,375

BOND ENHANCEMENT FOR DIRECT-BONDING PROCESSES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 28, 2022
Priority
Aug 29, 2018 — provisional 62/724,270 +1 more
Examiner
CHEN, JACK S J
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Adeia Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
438 granted / 572 resolved
+8.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 572 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, Species II in the reply filed on 11/16/2024 & 2/26/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that examining both groups (method and device) and/or species would not present a search burden. This is not found persuasive because this proposed process shows different inventions/species that would require a diversity field of search since their different classifications have already established. It would require undue burdensome search to examine all invention/species. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 12-26 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention/species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 11/16/2024 & 2/26/2026. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the first element, a dielectric layer, at least one pad; the first element comprising at least one recess at outer edges of opposite sides of the first element; the second element; a second element comprising a second direct bonding surface direct hybrid bonded to the first direct bonding surface of the first element; the second element overhanging the at least one recess such that the at least one recess is a non-bonded area of the first element and the at least one recess has a depth greater than a thickness of the pad (Re claim 2); metal features (Re claim 3); the second element is larger than the first element, such that outer surfaces of the second element are outside outer surfaces of the first element (Re claim 9); the second direct bonding surface is coplanar with a surface of the second element that overhangs the at least one recess (Re claim 10); must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-5 and 8-11 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re claim 2, the phrase “a first element with a dielectric layer comprising a first direct bonding surface and at least one pad at the direct bonding surface for hybrid bonding” is unclear and indefinite (which element comprising a first direct bonding surface? e.g., the first element or the dielectric layer comprising a first direct bonding surface? it appears that the “comprising” phrase applied to the dielectric layer; however, line 7 of the instant claim indicated that it applied to the first element, i.e., regarding the phrase “the first direct bonding surface of the first element” Furthermore, where is the at least one pad located since the phrase “the direct bonding surface” lacks antecedent basis). Re claim 2, the phrase “a second element comprising a second direct bonding surface direct hybrid bonded to the first direct bonding surface of the first element” is unclear and indefinite since the phrase “the first direct bonding surface of the first element” lacks antecedent basis. Re claim 3, the phrase “corresponding metal features of the first and second element” lacks antecedent basis. Re claim 8, the phrase “the dielectric bonding surface” lacks antecedent basis. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACK CHEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1689. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 8am to 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yara J. Green can be reached at (571)270-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACK S CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2022
Application Filed
May 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684829
FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677458
HYBRID COMPONENT WITH SILICON AND WIDE BANDGAP SEMCONDUCTOR MATERIAL IN SILICON RECESS
4y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666669
Field-Effect Transistor Device with Equivalent Source and Drain Region Optimization
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656670
Display System and Method for Making and Using Same
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660216
LOW-LEAKAGE SCHOTTKY DIODES AND METHOD OF MAKING A POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 572 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month