Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/149,432

LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 03, 2023
Priority
Mar 07, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0028959
Examiner
YANG, JAY LEE
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
671 granted / 910 resolved
+8.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
981
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
79.0%
+39.0% vs TC avg
§102
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 910 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Restriction/Election Requirement The Office acknowledges the Applicant’s election of Group I (drawn to device) as set forth in the Requirement for Restriction/Election filed 02/26/26 in the Response filed 04/02/26. The election reads on Claims 1-14 and 18-20. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 15-17 have been withdrawn from consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claim recites that R11-15 correspond to those “descriptions of R11 to R15 in claim 11” which render the exact scope of the claim indefinite as Claim 11 nowhere recites R11-15. The Office has interpreted R11-15 to correspond to those descriptions of R11 to R15 as recited in Claim 12 for the purpose of this Examination. Correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Steiger et al. (WO 2018/219757 A1). Examiner’s Note: The Office has relied on national phase publication US 2022/0376180 A1 as the English equivalent of WIPO/PCT publication WO 2018/219757 A1 (herein referred to as “Steiger et al.”). Unless otherwise noted, all figure, page, and paragraph numbers referenced herein refer to numbers found in the national phase publication. Steiger et al. discloses a quantum dot-based light-emitting device, an embodiment of which is shown below (comprising a plurality of sub-pixels): PNG media_image1.png 292 686 media_image1.png Greyscale that lie on top of substrate ([0016]); the first (and second) layers are charge-transporting layers, including the first layer being an electron-transporting layer ([0006]-[0007], [0015]). The first electrode is a cathode, while the second electrode is an anode; a layer of PEDOT:PSS (hole-injecting layer) is present between the anode and the second layer ([0105]-[0106]). Additional layers can exist, including charge-blocking layers, charge injection layers, etc. ([0010]). The first layer is formed via the use of a composition comprising a metal oxide (such as zinc oxide (ZnO)) ([0013]-[0014]). The first layer comprising the metal oxide further comprises a photo acid generator, including one comprising sulfonium ([0049]-[0050], [0068]). Steiger et al. discloses the existence of a hole-injecting layer separate from the hole-transporting layer ([0122]); there further exists electron- or hole-blocking layer (interposed between the light-emitting layer and the hole-transporting layer or electron-transporting layer, respectively) across the device comprising compounds such as m-MTDATA as shown below ([0122]-[0123]): PNG media_image2.png 254 288 media_image2.png Greyscale (antioxidant) such that R21-23 = substituted C6 carbocyclic group (substituted phenyl wherein substituent = R10a = -N(Q11)(Q12) (with Q11-12 = phenyl or tolyl)) of Applicant’s Formula 2. Steiger et al. further discloses the presence of a cover comprising light polarizing coating that lies on the device ([0126]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY L YANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1137. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 6am-3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer A Boyd can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY YANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679857
ORGANIC METAL COMPOUND, ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE HAVING THE COMPOUND
4y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674092
ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND, ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND DIAGNOSTIC COMPOSITION INCLUDING THE ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677593
NITROGEN-CONTAINING FUSED HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666863
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
7y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666783
LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
4y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+2.1%)
3y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 910 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month