Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/152,285

METHOD FOR REPAIRING MASK PLATE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 10, 2023
Priority
Oct 21, 2020 — CN 202011133646.9 +1 more
Examiner
TADAYYON ESLAMI, TABASSOM
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Yungu (Gu'An) Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
385 granted / 784 resolved
-15.9% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
844
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
93.2%
+53.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 784 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9, 12-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dian hong Li et al (Chinese Patent: 111733380, here after Li). Claim 1 is rejected. Li teaches a method for repairing a mask plate (4), the mask plate comprising: a frame (1) having an opening [page 2 last line, fig. 1], wherein the frame comprises a first side frame and a second side frame opposite in a first direction, and an upper side frame and a lower side frame opposite in a second direction [fig. 1], a plurality of first shielding strips (3), and a plurality of mask strips (21, or 4 area between mask opening as shows in fig. 1), wherein the plurality of first shielding strips (3) and the plurality of mask strips are fixed on the upper side frame and the lower side frame [fig. 2, fig. 1, page 5 lines 12-17], and the method comprises: identifying a mask strip deformation area, comprising identifying an area of the mask plate having a mask strip of the plurality of mask strips that expands inward and deforms in the second direction as the mask strip deformation area [fig. 3]; replacing a shielding strip of the plurality of first shielding strips, comprising: performing a net tensioning process for a second shielding strip (shielding strip with different tension) [page 5 lines 18-25], replacing at least part of the first shielding strips in the mask strip deformation area with the second shielding strip, and obviously connecting the second shielding strip to the upper side frame and the lower side frame. Li teaches deformation is inward and mask plate (and mask strip) does not expand outward. However, it is to the skill of an ordinary person in art to apply tension stress (rather than compressing) to have the mask plate and mask strips expand outward in absence of criticality, because the stress applied to the mask a plate (and mask strip) can be compression or tension. After replacing the first strip with second strip, mask strip that expands outward and deforms is retracted inward toward the inside of the opening along the second direction. Although Li does not teach repairing a mask plate, however replacing of one of the shield strips which results in adjusting elastic deformation of frame [page 5 lines 21-24], can be considered as repairing the mask. A number of second shielding strips is obviously correlated(positively) with an elastic deformation (retraction and deformation amount) that the mask strip which (expands outward and deforms along the second direction retracts inwardly along the second direction) [page 5 last 4 lines page 6 lines 1-4]. Li also teaches the step of replacing the shielding strip further comprises: in performing the net tensioning process for the second shielding strip, controlling the (pulling) force along the second direction applied to the second shielding strip, so that when the second shielding strip is connected to the upper side frame and the lower side frame, the mask strip that expands outward and deforms is retracted inward along the second direction to a state without deformation in the second direction [fig. 3], and in the mask strip deformation area, the mask strips (area between shielding strips) with intervals therebetween distributed in a direction from the second shielding strip to the left side frame, and the mask strips with intervals therebetween distributed in a direction from the second shielding strip to the right side frame, outward protrude and deform in opposite directions along a first direction [fig. 3]. PNG media_image1.png 1406 2500 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 2 is rejected. Although in this embodiment Li teaches the number of masking strips is 3[page 5 last paragraph first line, fig 3], however in another embodiment Li teaches the number of strips is 4[page 5 last paragraph lines 1-2]. With having 4 strip lines and same interval, the second shielding strips are symmetrically distributed with a center line of the mask strip deformation area in the first direction as a symmetry axis. Claim 3 is rejected for the same reason claim 2 is rejected. Li teaches the second shielding strip is located at a central portion of the mask strip deformation area in the first direction [fig. 3]. Claim 4 is rejected for the same reason claim 2 is rejected. With 4 shielding strips, at least two second shielding strips are located at the central portion and are distributed with intervals therebetween in the first direction. Claim 5 is rejected for the same reason claim 2 is rejected. With having 4 shielding strips, replacing at least one mask strip that expands outward and deforms and that is located at the central portion with at least one replaced mask strip [page 2 second paragraph], and the at least one replaced mask strip is disposed between adjacent second shielding strips at the central portion. Claim 6 is rejected. Although Li does not specifically teach tearing off the mask strip, however teaches replacing it, which in fact means removing or tearing it off. Li teaches deformation is inward and mask plate (and mask strip) does not expand outward. However, it is to the skill of an ordinary person in art to apply tension stress (rather than compressing) to have the mask plate and mask strips expand outward in absence of criticality, because the stress applied to the mask a plate (and mask strip) can be compression or tension. Therefore, the strip expands outward and deforms along the second direction at the central portion of the mask strip deformation area in the first direction; tearing off the first shielding strips disposed adjacently on the left and right sides of mask strip that expands outward and deforms(shielding strips are in center of mask opening areas, mask strips); obviously performing a net tensioning process for the second shielding strip and connecting the second shielding strip to the upper side frame and the lower side frame( to make sure the elastic deformation of the frame is adjusted by replacement) [page 5 lines 18-25], and the position where the second shielding strip is arranged on the mask plate is the same as that of the torn-off first shielding strips on the mask plate; it is also obvious performing a net tensioning process for the replaced mask strip and connecting the second shielding strip to the upper side frame and the lower side frame, where the replaced mask strip is arranged on the mask plate is the same as the position where the torn-off mask strip that expands outward and deforms is arranged on the mask plate. Claim 7 is rejected. Although Li does not teach the details of analyzing the data and obtaining results, however teach correction of shield strip with tension force [page 5 lines 18-25]. Therefor the details of analysis, establishing a database, the database comprising a three-dimensional curve among the outward expansion and deformation amount of the mask strip that expands outward and deforms along the second direction in the mask strip deformation area, a value of a pulling force along the second direction applied to the second shielding strip in the process of performing a net tensioning process for the second shielding strip and the number of the second shielding strips is not patentable over Li, because an ordinary skill in art can make and form data bases and curves to obtain results in absence of criticality. Claim 8 is rejected. An ordinary skill in art can use data base and according to the outward expansion and deformation amount of the mask strip that expands outward and deforms along the second direction in the mask strip deformation area determine the number of the second shielding strips. Claim 9 is rejected. Although Li applied compression force, however it is obvious to an ordinary skill in rat that a tension force also can apply in the second direction to the second shielding strip in the process of performing a net tensioning process for the second shielding strip through the database, which in fact according to the outward expansion and deformation amount of the mask strip that expands outward and deforms along the second direction in the mask strip deformation area the value of pulling force can be determined (for example with considering Poisson's ratio). Claim 12 is rejected. Li teaches in the step of identifying the mask strip deformation area, n first shielding strips (3) with intervals therebetween in the first direction, and n-1 mask strips (area between the opening of mask) that expand outward and deform in the second direction and are disposed in the intervals are formed in the mask strip deformation area, wherein nis greater than or equal to 2[fig, 2, area of deformation is between lines 3, and there are 3 lines and 2 areas]. Claim 13 is rejected as Li teaches each mask strip (4) of the plurality of mask strips comprise a plurality of pattern evaporation areas [fig. 2]. Claim 14 is rejected as Li teaches the plurality of pattern evaporation areas is distributed along the second direction [fig. 1]. Claim 15 is rejected as Li teaches establishing the database is performed before identifying the mask strip deformation area [page 3 last paragraph, page 5 lines 18-end of the page]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/10/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The examiner does not agree with applicant statement in page 8 of Remarks (02/10/26) when compression force applies to the frame, deformation in the first direction would be outward, and not inward, because the volume of the object has to be preserved. Based on Hooks law ΔL = F/k, elastic compression force in one direction (uniaxial compression) causes temporary deformation where a material shortens along the axis of force, and expanding perpendicular to it. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-1885. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:3-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached at 5712725166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1718
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Mar 03, 2025
Response Filed
May 15, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
May 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633502
ARC-BEAM SCANNING FOR SUPPRESSING ANODE OVERGROWTH IN PICVD SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12614712
Method for the Production of an Electrode for a Battery Cell of an Electrical Energy Storage Device, Electrode and Generator
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599968
METHOD OF PRODUCING AN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED OBJECT
5y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600634
2D AMORPHOUS CARBON FILM ASSEMBLED FROM GRAPHENE QUANTUM DOTS
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601049
AG- AND/OR CU- CONTAINING HARD COATINGS WITH ANTIBACTERIAL, ANTIVIRAL AND ANTIFUNGAL PROPERTIES
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+27.4%)
3y 5m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 784 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month