Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/153,470

COAXIAL I/O DIE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 12, 2023
Examiner
MAZUMDER, DIDARUL A
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BAE Systems PLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
630 granted / 728 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
751
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
86.0%
+46.0% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 728 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the application No. 18/153,470 filed on November 18, 2025. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgement is made of Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) form PTO-1449. These IDS has been considered. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-12, drawn to device, Group I, in the reply filed on 11/18/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 13-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected method claims, Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Specification 6. The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: “Coaxial I/O Die Comprising Coaxial Input/Output (IO) Connections, and Coaxial Probing Tools for Measuring RF Signal Performance and Integrity.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 7. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 8. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 9. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/ (a)(2) as¶ being anticipated by Immorlica Jr. et al. (US 5,151,769). Regarding independent claim 1, Immorlica Jr. et al. teaches a semiconductor package, comprising (Fig. 3): an interconnect (24/25 metallization layers, col. 5, lines 29-31); a mixed signal die (14 analog/digital, col. 2, lines 62-64) having a first surface (bottom surface) operably engaged with the interconnect (24/25) and a second surface (upper surface) opposite to the first surface; and at least one set of input/output (IO) connections (28 left-side) on the mixed signal die (14); wherein the at least one set of IO connections (28 left-side) is configured to be electromagnetically shielded in a non-linear geometry from at least another set of IO connections (28 right-side) that is different from the at least one set of IO connections (this is a functional limitation/an intended use). PNG media_image1.png 346 792 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Immorlica Jr et al. teaches wherein (Fig. 3), the at least one set of IO connections (28 left-side) further comprises: at least one radio frequency (RF) connection (29) formed on the mixed signal die (14); wherein at least one bond pad (27) of the at least one RF connection (29) is configured to be electromagnetically shielded in a non-linear geometry from the at least another set of IO connections adjacent to the at least one RF connection (this is a functional limitation/an intended use). Allowable Subject Matter 10. Claims 3 (claims 5-10 depend on the claim 3), 4, 11-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 3 recites …. wherein the at least one set of IO connections further comprises: at least one radio frequency (RF) connection formed on the mixed signal die; the at least one RF connection comprises: a first bond pad; and a second bond pad circumferentially surrounded by the first bond pad in a continuous, non-linear geometry to electromagnetically shield the second bond pad. Claim 4 recites …. wherein the at least one set of IO connections further comprises: at least one radio frequency (RF) connection formed to the second surface of the mixed signal die; the at least one RF connection comprises: a first bond pad; and a second bond pad circumferentially surrounded by the first bond pad in a continuous, curvilinear shape to electromagnetically shield the second bond pad. Claim 11 recites …. wherein the mixed signal die comprises: a first peripheral edge; a second peripheral edge being perpendicular to the first peripheral edge; a third peripheral edge being parallel with the first peripheral edge and perpendicular to the second peripheral edge; and a fourth peripheral edge being parallel with the second peripheral edge and perpendicular to the third peripheral edge; wherein the at least one RF connection is located interior to the first peripheral edge, the second peripheral edge, the third peripheral edge, and the fourth peripheral edge. Claim 12 recites …. wherein the mixed signal die comprises: a first peripheral edge; a second peripheral edge being perpendicular to the first peripheral edge; a third peripheral edge being parallel with the first peripheral edge and perpendicular to the second peripheral edge; and a fourth peripheral edge being parallel with the second peripheral edge and perpendicular to the third peripheral edge; wherein the at least one RF connection is located proximate to at least one of the first peripheral edge, the second peripheral edge, the third peripheral edge, and the fourth peripheral edge. 11. Prior arts, Immorlica Jr. et al. (US 5,151,769) or Huemoeller et al. (US 8432022 B1) does not disclose the RF connection comprises multiple bond pads, such as first bond, second bond pad circumferentially surrounded by the first bond pad in a continuous manner, non-linear geometry to electromagnetically shield the second bond pad. Therefore, the prior art of references stated in PTO-892 does not depict the limitations as stated above. Examiner’s Note 12. Applicant is reminded that the Examiner is entitled to give the broadest reasonable interpretation to the language of the claims. Furthermore, the Examiner is not limited to Applicants' definition which is not specifically set forth in the claims. See MPEP 2111, 2123, 2125, 2141.02 VI, and 2182. Examiner has cited particular paragraphs and/or columns/lines in the references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. See MPEP 2141.02 VI. In the case of amending the claimed invention, Applicant is respectfully requested to indicate the portion(s) of the specification which dictate(s) the structure relied on for proper interpretation and also to verify and ascertain the metes and bounds of the claimed invention. Conclusion 13. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIDARUL MAZUMDER whose telephone number is (571)272-8823. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. 14. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Partridge can be reached at 571-270-1402. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIDARUL A MAZUMDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641905
STACKED SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH CONNECTION PAD DISPOSED BETWEEN CONNECTION PAD SHIELDS
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642068
SELF-ALIGNED INTERCONNECTION STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635549
BUMP-FORMING DEVICE, BUMP-FORMING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628577
--METHOD FOR PREPARING TRANSITION METAL CHALCOGENIDE FILM AND ORGANOMETALIC PROMOTER AND FORMING THE SAME--
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628683
METHODS OF IMPROVING WIRE BONDING OPERATIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 728 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month