Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/162,920

INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICES INCLUDING A BACK SIDE POWER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 01, 2023
Priority
Sep 06, 2022 — provisional 63/374,624
Examiner
NGUYEN, DUY T V
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
839 granted / 1065 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
1125
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
78.8%
+38.8% vs TC avg
§102
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1065 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application 1. Acknowledgement is made of the amendment received on 3/5/2026. Claims 1-3, 5-10, 12-15 & 22 are pending in this application. Claims 11 & 16-21 are canceled. Claim 22 is new. Claim Objections 2. The claims are objected because of the following reasons: Re claim 10, page 3, line 8: after “source/drain region;” insert --and--. Re claim 22, line 2: in front of “upper surface” insert --flat--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 3. Claims 1-3, 5-10 and 12-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al. (US 2022/0238660) in view of Fujiwara et al. (US 2013/0146969) and Chu et al. (US 2021/0399099). Re claim 1, Huang teaches, under BRI, Figs. 5-7, 10 & 14-17, [0015, 0023, 0024, 0035, 0036], a method of forming an integrated circuit device, the method comprising: -forming a sacrificial layer (228) in a preliminary substrate (201) by adding an element (material of 228) into the preliminary substrate (201) (Fig. 7); -forming a transistor structure (240) on the preliminary substrate (201), wherein the transistor structure comprises a source/drain region (232S, D); -removing a lower portion of the preliminary substrate (201) until the sacrificial layer (228) is exposed (Fig. 11); -replacing an upper portion of the preliminary substrate (201) with a lower insulator (256) (Fig. 14) -replacing the sacrificial layer (228) with a power contact (266) that comprises an upper surface contacting the source/drain region (232S) (in a flipped view of Fig. 17); and -forming a power rail (270) that contacts a lower surface of the power contact (266). PNG media_image1.png 546 553 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 568 523 media_image2.png Greyscale Huang further teaches boron-doped silicon (Si:B); boron-doped SiGe (SiGe:B) (228, [0023]), however, Huang does not explicitly teach forming the sacrificial layer in the preliminary substrate by performing an ion implantation process on the preliminary substrate to add the element into the preliminary substrate. Fujiwara teaches, Fig. 4, [0068], performing an ion implantation process on the preliminary substrate to add the element (e.g., boron) into the preliminary substrate (120). As taught by Fujiwara, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching to form the sacrificial layer in the preliminary substrate by performing an ion implantation process on the preliminary substrate to add the element into the preliminary substrate as claimed, because ion implantation process is a known technique and widely used in the art to implant ions/species into a predetermined substrate to improve its properties. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Fujiwara in combination with Huang due to above reason. Huang/Fujiwara does not explicitly teach the power contact comprises a flat upper surface. Chu teaches, in view of Fig. 13B, [0035], the power contact (backside source contact 264) comprises a flat upper surface (surface of 264 contacting 262). As taught by Chu, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching in Huang/Fujiwara to obtain a flat upper surface of the power contact as claimed, because it aids in in reducing the resistance between the contact surfaces. Further, a change in shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Chu in combination with Huang/Fujiwara due to above reason. Re claim 2, Huang teaches, Figs. 7 & 10, the sacrificial layer (228) is formed before forming the transistor structure (240). Re claim 3, Huang teaches, Figs. 2 & 7-10, [0018, 0023, 0027], wherein forming the transistor structure (240) comprises: -forming a preliminary gate structure (212) on the preliminary substrate (201); -forming the source/drain region (232S, D) that overlaps the sacrificial layer (228); and -replacing the preliminary gate structure (212) with a gate structure (240), wherein the sacrificial layer (228) is formed after forming the preliminary gate structure (212). Re claim 5, in combination cited above, Huang teaches, Figs. 7 & 10-16, [0034, 0035], wherein the preliminary substrate comprises the upper portion and the lower portion, and -forming the sacrificial layer (228) comprises adding the element through an upper surface of the preliminary substrate (201), and the sacrificial layer is formed in the upper portion of the preliminary substrate (201), and wherein replacing the sacrificial layer (228) with the power contact (266) comprises: removing the sacrificial layer (228), thereby forming an opening (260) in the lower insulator (256) (Fig. 15); and forming the power contact (266) in the opening (260) (Fig. 16). Re claim 6, in combination cited above, Huang teaches, Fig. 12, [0032], forming the sacrificial layer (228) comprises forming the sacrificial layer by performing an ion implantation process (PAI process 300) on an upper surface of the preliminary substrate (201) (see also Fujiwara’s Fig 4, [0068]). Re claim 7, Huang teaches the element comprises boron [0032], and the preliminary substrate (of 204) comprises silicon [0015] (see also Fujikawa’s Fig 4, [0068]). Re claim 8, Huang teaches the power contact (266) comprises opposing side surfaces outwardly curved (Fig. 16). Re claim 9, Huang teaches, Figs. 11-16, [0030], before replacing the sacrificial layer (228) with the power contact (266), forming a back-end-of-line (BEOL) structure (interconnect structure 246) including a conductive wire (metal lines) on the transistor structure (240). Re claim 10, Huang teaches, under BRI, Figs. 5-7, 10 & 14-17, [0015, 0023, 0024, 0035, 0036], a method of forming an integrated circuit device, the method comprising: -converting a portion of a preliminary substrate (201) to a sacrificial layer (228) including an element; -forming a transistor structure (240) on the preliminary substrate (201), wherein the transistor structure comprises a source/drain region (232S, D); -removing a lower portion of the preliminary substrate (201) until the sacrificial layer (228) is exposed (Fig. 11); -replacing an upper portion of the preliminary substrate (201) with a lower insulator (256) (Fig. 15), after removing the lower portion of the preliminary substrate (201); -replacing the sacrificial layer (228) with a power contact (266) that comprises an upper surface contacting the source/drain region (232S) (in a flipped view of Fig. 17); -forming a power rail (270) that contacts a lower surface of the power contact (266). PNG media_image1.png 546 553 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 568 523 media_image2.png Greyscale Huang further teaches boron-doped silicon (Si:B); boron-doped SiGe (SiGe:B) (228, [0023]), however, Huang does not explicitly teach by doping the portion of the preliminary substrate with the element via ion implantation performed through an upper surface of the preliminary substrate. Fujiwara teaches, Fig. 4, [0068], by doping the portion of the preliminary substrate (120) with the element (e.g., boron) via ion implantation performed through an upper surface of the preliminary substrate (120). As taught by Fujiwara, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching to dope the portion of the preliminary substrate with the element via ion implantation performed through an upper surface of the preliminary substrate as claimed, because ion implantation process is a known technique and widely used in the art to implant ions/species into a predetermined substrate to improve its properties. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Fujiwara in combination with Huang due to above reason. Huang/Fujiwara does not explicitly teach the power contact comprises a flat upper surface. Chu teaches, in view of Fig. 13B, [0035], the power contact (backside source contact 264) comprises a flat upper surface (surface of 264 contacting 262). As taught by Chu, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching in Huang/Fujiwara to obtain a flat upper surface of the power contact as claimed, because it aids in in reducing the resistance between the contact surfaces. Further, a change in shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Chu in combination with Huang/Fujiwara due to above reason. Re claim 12, in combination cited above, Huang teaches, Figs. 2-10, [0018, 0023, 0024, 0027], forming the transistor structure comprises: forming a preliminary gate structure (212) on the preliminary substrate (201); converting the portion of the preliminary substrate (201) to the sacrificial layer (228) using the preliminary gate structure (212) as a mask; forming the source/drain region (232S) that overlaps the sacrificial layer (228); and then replacing the preliminary gate structure (212) with a gate structure (240). Huang does not explicitly teach by doping the portion of the preliminary substrat4e with the element. Fujiwara teaches, Fig. 4, [0068], by doping the portion of the preliminary substrate (120) with the element (e.g., boron). As taught by Fujiwara, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching to dope the portion of the preliminary substrate with the element as claimed, because doping process is a known technique and widely used in the art to implant ions/species into a predetermined substrate to improve its properties. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Fujiwara in combination with Huang due to above reason. Re claim 13, Huang teaches, Fig. 17, the power contact (266) comprises opposing side surface outwardly curved. Re claim 14, Huang teaches the element comprises boron [0032] (see also Fujiwara’s Fig. 4). Re claim 15, in combination cited above, Huang teaches, under BRI, Figs. 6-16, [0034, 0035], converting the portion of the preliminary substrate (201) to the sacrificial layer comprises adding the element (228) through the upper surface of the preliminary substrate (201), the preliminary substrate (201) comprises the upper portion and the lower portion (204, 202), and the sacrificial layer (228) is formed in the upper portion of the preliminary substrate (201), and wherein replacing the sacrificial layer (228) with the power contact (266) comprises: removing the sacrificial layer (228), thereby forming an opening (260) in the lower insulator (256) (Fig. 15); and forming the power contact (266) in the opening (260) (Fig. 16). 4. Claims 1 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al. (US 2022/0238660) in view of Fujiwara et al. (US 2013/0146969) and Tsai et al. (US 2022/0165860). Re claim 1, Huang teaches, under BRI, Figs. 5-7, 10 & 14-17, [0015, 0023, 0024, 0035, 0036], a method of forming an integrated circuit device, the method comprising: -forming a sacrificial layer (228) in a preliminary substrate (201) by adding an element (material of 228) into the preliminary substrate (201) (Fig. 7); -forming a transistor structure (240) on the preliminary substrate (201), wherein the transistor structure comprises a source/drain region (232S, D); -removing a lower portion of the preliminary substrate (201) until the sacrificial layer (228) is exposed (Fig. 11); -replacing an upper portion of the preliminary substrate (201) with a lower insulator (256) (Fig. 14) -replacing the sacrificial layer (228) with a power contact (266) that comprises an upper surface contacting the source/drain region (232S) (in a flipped view of Fig. 17); and -forming a power rail (270) that contacts a lower surface of the power contact (266). PNG media_image1.png 546 553 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 568 523 media_image2.png Greyscale Huang further teaches boron-doped silicon (Si:B); boron-doped SiGe (SiGe:B) (228, [0023]), however, Hunag does not explicitly teach forming the sacrificial layer in the preliminary substrate by performing an ion implantation process on the preliminary substrate to add the element into the preliminary substrate. Fujiwara teaches, Fig. 4, [0068], performing an ion implantation process on the preliminary substrate to add the element (e.g., boron) into the preliminary substrate (120). As taught by Fujiwara, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching to form the sacrificial layer in the preliminary substrate by performing an ion implantation process on the preliminary substrate to add the element into the preliminary substrate as claimed, because ion implantation process is a known technique and widely used in the art to implant ions/species into a predetermined substrate to improve its properties. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Fujiwara in combination with Huang due to above reason. Huang/Fujiwara does not explicitly teach the power contact comprises a flat upper surface. Tsai teaches, in view of Fig. 23, [0037], the power contact (backside source contact 264) comprises a flat upper surface (surface of 264 contacting 226). As taught by Tsai, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching in to obtain a flat upper surface of the power contact as claimed, because it aids in in reducing contact resistance the source/drain feature. Further, a change in shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Tsai in combination with Huang/Fujiwara due to above reason. Re claim 10, Huang teaches, under BRI, Figs. 5-7, 10 & 14-17, [0015, 0023, 0024, 0035, 0036], a method of forming an integrated circuit device, the method comprising: -converting a portion of a preliminary substrate (201) to a sacrificial layer (228) including an element; -forming a transistor structure (240) on the preliminary substrate (201), wherein the transistor structure comprises a source/drain region (232S, D); -removing a lower portion of the preliminary substrate (201) until the sacrificial layer (228) is exposed (Fig. 11); -replacing an upper portion of the preliminary substrate (201) with a lower insulator (256) (Fig. 15), after removing the lower portion of the preliminary substrate (201); -replacing the sacrificial layer (228) with a power contact (266) that comprises an upper surface contacting the source/drain region (232S) (in a flipped view of Fig. 17); -forming a power rail (270) that contacts a lower surface of the power contact (266). PNG media_image1.png 546 553 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 568 523 media_image2.png Greyscale Huang further teaches boron-doped silicon (Si:B); boron-doped SiGe (SiGe:B) (228, [0023]), however, Huang does not explicitly teach by doping the portion of the preliminary substrate with the element via ion implantation performed through an upper surface of the preliminary substrate. Fujiwara teaches, Fig. 4, [0068], by doping the portion of the preliminary substrate (120) with the element (e.g., boron) via ion implantation performed through an upper surface of the preliminary substrate (120). As taught by Fujiwara, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching to dope the portion of the preliminary substrate with the element via ion implantation performed through an upper surface of the preliminary substrate as claimed, because ion implantation process is a known technique and widely used in the art to implant ions/species into a predetermined substrate to improve its properties. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Fujiwara in combination with Huang due to above reason. Huang/Fujiwara does not explicitly teach the power contact comprises a flat upper surface. Tsai teaches, in view of Fig. 23, [0037], the power contact (backside source contact 264) comprises a flat upper surface (surface of 264 contacting 226). As taught by Tsai, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize & modify the above teaching in to obtain a flat upper surface of the power contact as claimed, because it aids in in reducing contact resistance the source/drain feature. Further, a change in shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Tsai in combination with Huang/Fujiwara due to above reason. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claim 22 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments 6. Applicant's arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Response to arguments on newly added limitations are responded to in the above rejection. Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DUY T.V. NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7431. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7AM-4PM, alternative Friday off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, EVA MONTALVO can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUY T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818 6/1/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jul 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 29, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685178
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE COMPRISING SUB-ALIGNMENT MARKS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672318
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES INCLUDING BUFFER LAYER STRUCTURE
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672274
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672424
SENSOR EMBEDDED DISPLAY PANEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666959
METHOD FOR FORMING SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE INCLUDING CAPACITOR
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1065 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month