Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/178,333

CAPACITOR INCLUDING LATERAL PLATES AND METHOD FOR FORMING A CAPACITOR

Non-Final OA §102§112§Other
Filed
Mar 03, 2023
Examiner
BODNAR, JOHN A
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
STMicroelectronics
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
482 granted / 579 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
604
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 579 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112 §Other
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA , is assigned to STMicroelectronics (Crolles 2) SAS and claims foreign priority to 20220100227, filed 03/11/2022. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 4 and 5 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 4 recites the limitation " second layers." There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 5 recites, “the pads resting on the track.” It is not clear what the pads are doing on the track, and it is not clear if track has any meaning in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1, 2, 4, 5, 21 and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1/a2 as being anticipated by Lilak et al. (U.S2020/0194435). As for claim 1, Lilak teaches in figure a 1a and 1c, a device, comprising at least one capacitor, the capacitor including: two metal pads (141/152) [0039]; at least two metal plates (151), each plate extending at least from one pad to the other; a first insulating layer (156) conformally covering said assembly; and a second conductive layer (142) conformally covering the first layer. As for claim 2, Lilak teaches the device according to claim 1, wherein two neighboring plates of a same capacitor are separated by two portions of the first insulating layer and one portion of the second conductive layer located between the two portions of the first insulating layer (shown in figure 1A at 120). As for claim 4, Lilak teaches the device according to claim 1, and teaches in figure 1a a plurality of capacitors (arranged horizontally), the second layers of the capacitors being coupled by portions of the second layer (142 couples the stacks at the end with dielectric 113). As for claim 5, Lilak teaches the device according to claim 1, and teaches that the capacitor includes a conductive track in a third insulating layer of the device, the pads resting on the track.(in figure 1c, 141 extends above the capacitors adjacent to the transistor, and is disposed on insulator 169). As for claim 21 Lilak teaches in figures 1a-1c a device, comprising: a capacitor (mim capacitor 121, [0034]), including: a first metal pad (141) and a second metal pad; (142) a first metal plate 151 and a second metal plate (151, there are 4 shown), the first metal plate and the second metal plate each plate extending at least from the first metal pad to the second metal pad, a first insulating layer (156) covering the first and second metal pads and the first and second metal plates; and a conductive layer (142 between the plates) on the insulating layer. As for claim 27, Lilak teaches the device according to claim 21, and teaches in figure 1c the first and second plates are separated by two portions of the first insulating layer and one portion of the conductive layer located between the two portions of the first insulating layer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 6, 7 and 28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. As for claims 3 and 28, Lilak teaches the device according to claim 1, but the prior art does not teach the pads include a metal core and a sheath made of the same material as the plates. As for claim 6, Lilak teaches the device according to claim 5, but the prior art does not teach that the capacitor includes a fourth insulating layer covering the conductive track, the pads crossing the third insulating layer, the fourth layer being located between the plates and the track. Claim 7 depends from claim 6 and includes the same novel limitation. Claims 18-20 and 22-27 are allowed. As for claim 18 and 22, The prior art does not teach or make obvious the capacitor structure claimed that includes a conductive track with pads disposed on it and a plurality of conductive plates extending laterally between the pair of conductive pads. Claims 19-20 depend from claim 18 and include the same novel limitations. Claims 23-27 depend from claim 22 and include the same novel features. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN A BODNAR whose telephone number is (571)272-4660. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th and every other Friday 7:30-5:30 Central time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yara Green can be reached at 571-270-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN A BODNAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 03, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604473
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604488
SILICON CAPACITOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588277
FORMING WRAP AROUND CONTACT WITH SELF-ALIGNED BACKSIDE CONTACT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588224
METAL-INSULATOR-METAL (MIM) CAPACITORS WITH CURVED ELECTRODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588516
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 579 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month