Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/183,645

ANYWHERE PARKING TRAILER

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Mar 14, 2023
Examiner
LAGUARDA, GONZALO
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
503 granted / 694 resolved
+2.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
755
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 694 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 8-11, 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Singh (U.S. Pub. No. 2016/0129939). Regarding claim 1, 8, 15, Singh discloses a trailer tow assist system for assisting in rearward maneuvering of a trailer attached to a vehicle, the trailer tow assist system comprising: a rear video camera (9, 10, 11) for providing a rearward image of the trailer and surroundings; a steering wheel position controller for controlling steering of the vehicle; and an electronic tow assist unit including an electronic processor and a memory, the electronic tow assist unit configured to: receive, from a user, an input a target location (¶56 discloses reversing into a parking destination), the path including a sequence of waypoints (each point along the path can be construed as a waypoint ¶69 discloses using the cameras to monitor position along the route. And ¶24 and 83 discuss dynamically changing the route as the maneuver is being performed. ¶79 discloses the calculation of waypoints and confirmation of those points achieving the desired results), each waypoint including a respective set of x-y coordinates (however labeled these points are along a path with a horizontal and vertical component) and orientation information associated with the vehicle and the trailer; determine a trailer angle for the trailer relative to the vehicle based upon video data received from the rear video camera (¶79 is disclosing the calculations of the trailer angle along the path, ¶80 discloses that this allows for calculation of the hitch angle, ¶84); select a target waypoint positioned along the reverse direction path (¶79-84 disclose how the path is segmented) from the sequence of waypoints; determine an offset (¶33-34) between a current position and orientation of the trailer and a target position and orientation of the trailer associated with the target waypoint; determine a target trailer angle needed to maneuver the trailer to the target waypoint, the target trailer angle determined based on the offset between the current position and orientation of the trailer and the target position and orientation of the trailer (¶79); determine an offset between the trailer angle and the target trailer angle (¶79); determine a steering angle based on the offset between the trailer angle and the target trailer angle (¶63, ¶65, ¶79, ¶85, ¶86); and control, via the steering wheel position controller, steering of the vehicle based on the steering angle while the vehicle moves backwards (¶102-103). Singh does not disclose that the input is defining a path to a target location. Lavoie, which deals in autonomous parking, teaches that the input is defining a path to a target location (col. 6, line 66 – col. 7, line 30). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have modified Singh with the drawing of the path of Lavoie because to allow for more parking options (col. 2, lines 60-65). Regarding claim 2 and 9 which depends from claim 1 and 8 respectively, Singh discloses wherein the electronic tow assist unit is further configured to: determine an updated position of the vehicle and the trailer; stop maneuvering the trailer when the updated position of the vehicle and the trailer is the final position of the vehicle and the trailer; and responsive to determining that the updated position of the vehicle and the trailer is not the final position of the vehicle and the trailer, determine an updated trailer angle and select a new target waypoint positioned along the reverse direction path (fig. 5 shows determining the path and ¶102 discloses updating the angles and adjusting the steering control). Regarding claim 3 and 10 which depends from claim 1 and 8 respectively, Singh discloses further comprising an input device configured to receive the input from a user (¶66-67). Regarding claim 4 and 11 which depends from claim 3 and 10 respectively, Singh discloses wherein the input device is further configured to receive an input of the final position of the vehicle and the trailer from a user (¶66-67). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/29/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues on page 7 and 8 that the Singh reference fails to disclose x-y coordinates of the waypoints. Paragraph 79 discusses “interval distance” and “calculating points” that can be construed as waypoints, and however labeled would include horizontal and vertical components to the information. Where applicant argues for the amendments made to the claims they have been addressed above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GONZALO LAGUARDA whose telephone number is (571)272-5920. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5 M-Th Alt. F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at (571) 270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GONZALO LAGUARDA Primary Examiner Art Unit 3747 email: gonzalo.laguarda@uspto.gov /GONZALO LAGUARDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other
Jul 28, 2025
Interview Requested
Jul 29, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §Other
Dec 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 23, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 23, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594921
ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE PRESSURE GENERATOR INCLUDING AN ANTI-TWIST PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589738
VEHICLE-TRAVELING CONTROL SYSTEM AND VEHICLE-TRAVELING CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583518
METHOD FOR OPERATING A PARKING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, PARKING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565191
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE AND VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559116
VEHICLE FOR PREGNANT WOMAN AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 694 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month