Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/186,102

POLARIMETRIC IMAGE SENSOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 17, 2023
Examiner
SMITH, MAURICE C
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
STMicroelectronics
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
594 granted / 704 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-4.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
737
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
47.3%
+7.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 704 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang CN 111240082 in view of e-learning, “Internal structure of a liquid crystal or LCD TV screen” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx-JVoOFYhs, Jan 23, 2022 hereafter e-learning. With respect to claim 12, Wang teaches a device, comprising: a substrate (fig 1, 3) “the liquid crystal pixel layer” (pg. 2, ¶ 9); a pixel “liquid crystal pixel” in the substrate (pg. 2, ¶ 9); a diffraction structure (fig 1, 63) “first grating layer” (pg. 2, ¶ 9) on the pixel, the diffraction structure including a plurality of first patterns (fig 1, 61) “transparent region” (pg. 4, ¶ 1, lines 1-3) that correspond to the plurality of pixels, a first one of the plurality of first patterns being different from the other adjacent ones (fig 1, 62) “shielding region” (pg. 4, ¶ 1, lines 1-3) of the plurality of first patterns; and a polarization structure (fig 1) “first polarizer” (pg. 2, ¶ 9) on the diffraction structure “laminated in this order” (pg. 2, ¶ 9). Wang does not specifically teach a plurality of pixels. e-learning, in the same field of endeavor as Wang of LCD displays, teaches a liquid crystal layer i.e. pixels comprise a plurality of liquid crystals (fig 1). At the time prior to the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine a plurality of liquid crystals with Wang’s liquid crystal layer to create various shades of color in order to generate an image. PNG media_image1.png 862 1374 media_image1.png Greyscale Pertinent Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CN 110546763, CN 111240082, & Kiyotaka Sasagawa, “Polarization Image Sensor for Highly Sensitive Polarization Modulation Imaging Based on Stacked Polarizers” 6, JUNE 2022. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 & 20-25 are allowed. Claims 13 & 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims or to include the limitation(s) and any intervening claims into the base claim. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to claim 1, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to disclose or render obvious “a polarimetric image sensor in and on a semiconductor substrate, the sensor including a plurality of pixels, each pixel including: a photosensitive region in the semiconductor substrate; a diffraction structure on an illumination surface of the photosensitive region, the diffraction structure including a first pattern; and a polarization structure the diffraction structure opposite to the photosensitive region, the polarization structure including a second pattern that is different than the first pattern”, in combination with the rest of the limitations of claim 1. As to claim 13, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to disclose or render obvious “wherein the polarization structure includes a plurality of second patterns, the plurality of first patterns being different from the plurality of second patterns”, in combination with the rest of the limitations of claim 13. As to claim 20, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to disclose or render obvious “a photosensitive region in the silicon substrate, comprising a photodetection element; a diffraction structure on an illumination surface of the photosensitive region, the diffraction structure including a first pattern; and a polarization structure on the diffraction structure opposite to the photosensitive region, the polarization structure including a second pattern that is different than the first pattern, wherein the plurality of pixels comprises at least first and second pixels adapted to measuring radiations according respectively to first and second distinct polarizations ”, in combination with the rest of the limitations of claim 20. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAURICE C SMITH whose telephone number is (571)272-2526. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kara Geisel can be reached at (571) 272-2416. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAURICE C SMITH/Examiner, Art Unit 2877
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590882
THRESHOLD GATING FOR FLOW CYTOMETRY METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590889
OUTLIER DETECTION FOR SPECTROSCOPIC CLASSIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571678
SPECTROSCOPE AND SPECTROSCOPE PRODUCTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566253
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING LASER EMISSION, AND RELATED APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560533
OPTICAL SYSTEM COMPRISING ANS OPTICAL MULTIPLEXER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (-4.5%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 704 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month