Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/186,403

VERTICAL ORIENTED SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING A REDUCED LATERAL FIELD TERMINATION DISTANCE, AS WELL AS A CORRESPONDING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 20, 2023
Examiner
AHMED, SHAHED
Art Unit
2813
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nexperia B V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
866 granted / 955 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1000
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 955 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to application No. 18186403 filed on 3/20/2023. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election with traverse of claims 1-6, 8-14, 16-17 in the reply filed on 8/18/2025 is acknowledged. Applicant argues that there is no undue burden due to the product/process and species restriction. The examiner would like to note that the product and process claims require different classification searches (e.g. H10D62/109 vs H01L21/76224). Additionally, the species have different characteristics, for example species II (Fig. 3) and species III (Fig. 4) requires different type of isolation that would require different classification searches (e.g. Species II would require H01L21/76224 classification search and Species III would require H10D62/113, H10D84/0153, H10D84/0151 etc. classification search). Accordingly, there is a search burden and the restriction requirement is maintained and made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8-14, 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hirler et al. (US 2013/0037906). Regarding independent claim 1, Hirler et al. teach a vertically oriented semiconductor device (Fig. 4, element 150) comprising a semiconductor body (Fig. 4, element 30) having a first major surface, the semiconductor device comprising: a substrate (Fig. 4, element 20); a first region (Fig. 4, element 2a, paragraph 0065), being an epitaxial layer, provided on the substrate and having a first conductivity type; a conductive element (Fig. 4, element 1 is p type) provided on the first region, wherein the semiconductor device has a breakdown voltage that depends on a distance between the conductive element and the substrate and/or depends on a doping level of the first region (the structure in Fig. 4 is analogous to the claimed structure), so that a junction (Fig. 4, pn junction) is provided between the first region and the conductive element; a trench (Fig. 4, element 27) extending into the semiconductor body from the first major surface to an extension depth extending at least as deep as an extension depth of the conductive element along a vertical direction of the vertically oriented semiconductor device; wherein the trench comprises a material (Fig. 4, element 7, paragraph 0047 discloses silicon oxide) arranged to provide electrical insulation to limit a lateral field termination distance associated with the breakdown voltage corresponding to the junction; wherein the trench extends from the first major surface at a location at a non-zero lateral distance from an active region (Fig. 4, regions where gate structure 12 is formed) of the semiconductor device so that the first region is provided between the trench and the active region (Fig. 4), or at a location comprised within the conductive element; and wherein the trench is formed so that a direct blockage is provided, up till the extension depth of the trench, in a lateral direction with respect to the active region, along the active region in a direction perpendicular to the lateral direction and to the vertical direction (Fig. 4 discloses the claimed structure, therefore the properties/intended use are implied in the structure). Regarding claim 2, Hirler et al. teach wherein the active area and the trench has a lateral distance that is uniform along the direction perpendicular to the lateral direction and to the vertical direction (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 3, Hirler et al. teach wherein the trench is electrically floating (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 4, Hirler et al. teach wherein the trench is disconnected from electrical terminals of the device (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 5, Hirler et al. teach wherein the trench integrally comprises undoped material (paragraph 0047 discloses “Vertical trench 27 may be completely filled with a dielectric material such as silicon oxide”). Regarding claim 6, Hirler et al. teach wherein the trench integrally comprises of electrically non-conductive material “Vertical trench 27 may be completely filled with a dielectric material such as silicon oxide”). Regarding claim 8, Hirler et al. teach wherein the conductive element is selected from the group consisting of: a second region having a second conductive type opposite to the first opposite type (Fig. 4), so that a junction is provided between the first and second region; a functional trench of a Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET); and a metal barrier of a Schottky diode. Regarding claim 9, Hirler et al. teach herein the material is selected from the group consisting of: Silicon Oxide, Silicon Nitride, and undoped Polysilicon (paragraph 0047). Regarding claim 10, Hirler et al. teach wherein the semiconductor device is selected from the group consisting of a bipolar transistor, a Zener, a Schottky diode, a PN diode, an insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT), and a Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) (paragraph 0063). Regarding claim 11, Hirler et al. teach wherein the trench is electrically floating (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 12, Hirler et al. teach wherein the trench is disconnected from electrical terminals of the device (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 13, Hirler et al. teach wherein the trench integrally comprises undoped material (paragraph 0047 discloses “Vertical trench 27 may be completely filled with a dielectric material such as silicon oxide”). Regarding claim 14, Hirler et al. teach wherein the trench integrally comprises of electrically non-conductive material (paragraph 0047 discloses “Vertical trench 27 may be completely filled with a dielectric material such as silicon oxide”). Regarding claim 16, Hirler et al. teach wherein the conductive element is selected from the group consisting of: a second region having a second conductive type opposite to the first opposite type, so that a junction is provided between the first and second region (Fig. 4); a functional trench of a Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET); and a metal barrier of a Schottky diode. Regarding claim 17, Hirler et al. teach wherein the material is selected from the group consisting of: Silicon Oxide, Silicon Nitride and undoped Polysilicon (paragraph 0047 discloses “Vertical trench 27 may be completely filled with a dielectric material such as silicon oxide”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAHED AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-3477. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Gauthier can be reached on 571-270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAHED AHMED/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604673
JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604589
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604498
MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604502
NANOCHANNEL GALLIUM NITRIDE-BASED DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598762
METHODS OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH LOCAL ISOLATION AND A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH LOCAL ISOLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 955 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month