Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/187,558

Impedance Matching Network and Control Method

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 21, 2023
Examiner
FERNANDEZ, PEDRO C
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tokyo Electron Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
191 granted / 252 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
264
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 252 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The present Office Action is in response to Applicants’ filing of March 21, 2023. Claims 1-20 are presented for examination, with Claims 1, 9, and 16 being in independent form. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on March 21, 2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication No. 2022/0076923 (“Carroll”) in view of U.S. Patent No. 8,542,078 (“de Jongh”). Regarding Claim 1, Carroll discloses a matching circuit for a plasma tool (Fig. 1; [0043]-[0047]; Fig. 12; [0085]-[0086]) comprising: an impedance matching network (104) configured to be coupled between a power supply (102) and a plasma chamber (106), the plasma chamber being configured to operate a plasma in a predetermined frequency range ([0044]), the power supply being configured to provide power for the plasma chamber ([0046]), the impedance matching network comprising a first pi-network in series coupled between an input of the plasma chamber and an output of the power supply (104 in Fig. 12; [0085]-[0086]), and the impedance matching network being configured such that, during operation of the plasma chamber in the predetermined frequency range, an impedance of the impedance matching network and the plasma chamber equals an impedance of the power supply ([0046]-[0047]). Carroll fails to specifically disclose a second pi-network. However, de Jongh teaches a second pi-network (Fig. 1a; col. 1, lines 32-41). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have replaced L1 of the first pi-network as disclosed by Carroll with the second pi-network as taught by de Jongh, in order to use a well-known pi-network impedance matching circuit, as evidenced by de Jongh (col. 1, lines 32-33). Regarding Claim 2, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh further teaches wherein the plasma chamber is configured to operate the plasma in the predetermined frequency range that extends from a lower frequency of about 400 kHz to an upper frequency of about 13.56 MHz (Carroll, [0044]). Regarding Claim 3, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh further teaches wherein the impedance matching network is configured to isolate the power supply from any frequencies that are higher than the upper frequency that are present at the plasma chamber (Carroll, [0047]). Regarding Claim 4, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 1, further teaches wherein the output of the power supply (Carroll, 102) is coupled to the second pi-network (de Jongh, Fig. 1a) through the first pi-network (Carroll, 104 in Fig. 12). Regarding Claim 5, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 1, further teaches wherein the first pi-network comprises: a first adjustable capacitor coupled between the output of the power supply and ground (Carroll, C1 in Fig. 12); a first adjustable inductor coupled between a common node of the output of the power supply and the first adjustable capacitor (Carroll, L2 in Fig. 12), and a common node of a second adjustable capacitor (de Jongh, CP1 in Fig. 1a) and a second adjustable inductor (de Jongh, IN1 in Fig. 1a); and the second adjustable capacitor coupled between a common node of the first adjustable inductor and the second adjustable inductor, and ground (de Jongh, CP1 in Fig. 1a). Regarding Claim 6, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 1, further teaches wherein the second pi-network comprises: the second adjustable capacitor, wherein the second adjustable capacitor is shared by both the first pi-network and the second pi-network (de Jongh, CP1 in Fig. 1a); the second adjustable inductor coupled between a common node of the first adjustable inductor and the second adjustable capacitor (de Jongh, IN1 in Fig. 1a), and a common node of a third adjustable capacitor and the input of the plasma chamber; and the third adjustable capacitor coupled between the input of the plasma chamber and ground (de Jongh, CP2 in Fig. 1a). Regarding Claim 7, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 1, further teaches wherein the impedance matching network further comprises a fourth adjustable capacitor coupled in parallel with the first adjustable inductor (Carroll, C2 in Fig. 12). Regarding Claim 8, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh further teaches wherein the first adjustable capacitor, the second adjustable capacitor, and the third adjustable capacitor are shunt capacitors (Carroll, [0053]). Regarding Claim 9, Carroll discloses a method (Fig. 1; [0043]-[0047]; Fig. 12; [0085]-[0086]) comprising: providing power from a power supply (102) to a plasma chamber (106), an impedance matching network being coupled between an output of the power supply and an input of the plasma chamber (104), the impedance matching network comprising a first pi-network connected in series (104 in Fig. 12; [0085]-[0086]), and the impedance matching network comprising a combined total of four adjustable capacitive elements and adjustable inductive elements (C1-2, L1-2 in Fig. 12); configuring the plasma chamber to operate at a first frequency within a predetermined frequency range, the predetermined frequency range extending from a second frequency to a third frequency, the third frequency being higher than the second frequency ([0044]; [0121]); and based on the first frequency, adjusting the impedance matching network such that an impedance of the impedance matching network and the plasma chamber equals an impedance of the power supply ([0046]-[0047; [0122]). Carroll fails to specifically disclose a second pi-network including the remaining adjustable capacitive and inductive elements. However, de Jongh teaches a second pi-network including the remaining adjustable capacitive and inductive elements (CP1-2, and IN1 in Fig. 1a; col. 1, lines 32-41). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have replaced L1 of the first pi-network as disclosed by Carroll with the second pi-network as taught by de Jongh, in order to use a well-known pi-network impedance matching circuit, as evidenced by de Jongh (col. 1, lines 32-33). Regarding Claim 10, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh further teaches isolating the power supply from any frequencies that are present at the plasma chamber that are higher than the third frequency using the impedance matching network (Carroll, [0047]). Regarding Claim 11, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh further teaches configuring the plasma chamber to operate in a fourth frequency in the predetermined frequency range; and based on the fourth frequency, adjusting the impedance matching network such that in the predetermined frequency range, the impedance of the impedance matching network and the plasma chamber equals the impedance of the power supply (Carroll, [0046]-[0047]; [0057]). Regarding Claim 12, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 9, further teaches wherein the first pi-network comprises: a first adjustable capacitor coupled between the output of the power supply and ground (Carroll, C1 in Fig. 12); a first adjustable inductor coupled between a common node of the output of the power supply and the first adjustable capacitor (Carroll, L2 in Fig. 12), and a common node of a second adjustable capacitor (de Jongh, CP1 in Fig. 1a) and a second adjustable inductor (de Jongh, IN1 in Fig. 1a); and the second adjustable capacitor coupled between a common node of the first adjustable inductor and the second adjustable inductor, and ground (de Jongh, CP1 in Fig. 1a). Regarding Claim 13, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 9, further teaches wherein the second pi-network comprises: the second adjustable capacitor, wherein the second adjustable capacitor is shared by both the first pi-network and the second pi-network (de Jongh, CP1 in Fig. 1a); the second adjustable inductor coupled between a common node of the first adjustable inductor and the second adjustable capacitor (de Jongh, IN1 in Fig. 1a), and a common node of a third adjustable capacitor and the input of the plasma chamber; and the third adjustable capacitor coupled between the input of the plasma chamber and ground (de Jongh, CP2 in Fig. 1a). Regarding Claim 14, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 9, further teaches wherein the impedance matching network further comprises a fourth adjustable capacitor coupled in parallel with the first adjustable inductor (Carroll, C2 in Fig. 12). Regarding Claim 15, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh further teaches dynamically adjusting the first adjustable capacitor, the second adjustable capacitor, the third adjustable capacitor, the fourth adjustable capacitor, the first adjustable inductor, and the second adjustable inductor such that the impedance of the impedance matching network and the plasma chamber equals the impedance of the power supply (Carroll, [0046]-[0047]; [0057]; [0141]). Regarding Claim 16, Carroll discloses a system (Fig. 1; [0043]-[0047]; Fig. 12; [0085]-[0086]) comprising: a plasma chamber (106) coupled to a power source (102); and an impedance matching network coupled between an output of the power source and an input of the plasma chamber (104), wherein the impedance matching network is configured such that, in a predetermined frequency range ([0044]), an impedance of the impedance matching network and the plasma chamber is equal to an impedance of the power source ([0046]-[0047]), wherein the impedance matching network (104) comprises: a first pi-network comprising a first adjustable capacitor (C1), a second adjustable inductor (L1) and a first adjustable inductor (L2); and a third adjustable capacitor (C2) coupled in parallel with the first adjustable inductor (L2). Carroll fails to specifically disclose a second adjustable capacitor in a second pi-network. However, de Jongh teaches a second adjustable capacitor in a second pi-network (CP1 in Fig. 1a; col. 1, lines 32-41). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have replaced L1 of the first pi-network as disclosed by Carroll with the second adjustable capacitor of second pi-network as taught by de Jongh, in order to use a well-known pi-network impedance matching circuit, as evidenced by de Jongh (col. 1, lines 32-33). Regarding Claim 17, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 16, further teaches wherein the first adjustable capacitor is coupled between the output of the power source and ground (Carroll, C1 in Fig. 12), wherein the second adjustable capacitor is coupled between a common node of the first adjustable inductor (Carroll, L2 in Fig. 12) and a second adjustable inductor (de Jongh, IN1 in Fig. 1a), and ground, and wherein the first adjustable inductor is coupled between a common node of the output of the power source and the first adjustable capacitor, and a common node of the second adjustable capacitor and the second adjustable inductor (Carroll, L2 in Fig. 12). Regarding Claim 18, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh, as applied to Claim 16, further teaches wherein the impedance matching network further comprises: a second pi-network connected in series with the first pi-network, the second pi-network comprising: the second adjustable capacitor, wherein the second adjustable capacitor is shared by both the first pi-network and the second pi-network (de Jongh, CP1 in Fig. 1a); the second adjustable inductor coupled between a common node of the first adjustable inductor and the second adjustable capacitor (de Jongh, IN1 in Fig. 1a), and a common node of a fourth adjustable capacitor (de Jongh, CP2 in Fig. 1a) and the input of the plasma chamber; and the fourth adjustable capacitor coupled between the input of the plasma chamber and ground (de Jongh, CP2 in Fig. 1a). Regarding Claim 19, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh further teaches wherein the plasma chamber is configured to operate a plasma within the plasma chamber in the predetermined frequency range from about 400 kHz to about 13.56 MHz (Carroll, [0044]). Regarding Claim 20, the combination of Carroll in view of de Jongh further teaches wherein the impedance matching network is configured to act as a filter and prevent frequencies that are present at the plasma chamber that are higher than the predetermined frequency range from traveling to the power source (Carroll, [0046]-[0047], [0057]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent Application No. 2024/0194447 (“Guo”) relates to learning base tuning in a radio frequency plasma processing chamber. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2023/0200657 (“Oliveti”) relates to a hybrid matching network topology. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2023/0030569 (“Kim”) relates to a signal power splitter/combiner with resistance and impedance transformer loading. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2017/0310297 (“Mei”) relates to an impedance matching component. U.S. patent Publication No. 2014/0104132 (“Bakalski”) relates to an impedance matching network with improved quality factor and method for matching impedance. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PEDRO C FERNANDEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-7050. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander H Taningco can be reached at 1-(571) 272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PEDRO C FERNANDEZ/Examiner, Art Unit 2844 /ALEXANDER H TANINGCO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2844
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12581581
AEROSOL-GENERATING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12538397
CONTROLLING COLOR TEMPERATURE AND LUMINANCE IN LINEAR LED FIXTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12538395
ILLUMINATION DEVICE AND ILLUMINATION PROCESS WITH LIMITATION OF MAXIMUM IRRADIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12526897
Autonomous Circadian Lighting System with Environmental and Sensor Input
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12522132
VISUAL FRONT ALERT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 252 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month