Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/196,242

CLOCK CONVERTING CIRCUIT WITH SYMMETRIC STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 11, 2023
Examiner
ZAMAN, FAISAL M
Art Unit
2175
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
614 granted / 917 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
960
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
63.4%
+23.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 917 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The indicated allowability of claims 19 and 20 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference to Keeth (U.S. Patent Number 6,111,446). Rejections based on the newly cited reference follow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Keeth (U.S. Patent Number 6,111,446). Regarding Claim 19, Keeth discloses a clock converting circuit (Figure 6, item 400) comprising: a first switch (Figure 6, item 410; i.e., a multiplexer) connected between a first input node (Figure 6, see input to multiplexer 410) and a first node (Figure 6, see output from multiplexer 410), and configured to receive a first input clock signal (Figure 6, item CLK) at the first input node and operate in response to a first logic state of a second input clock signal (Figure 6, item CLK90, Column 6, lines 2-4; i.e., multiplexer 410 is activated in response to the CLK90 being a high state [the claimed “first logic state”]); a second switch (Figure 6, item 414) connected between a ground node and the first node, and configured to operate in response to a second logic state of the second input clock signal (Column 6, lines 2-4; i.e., although the reference does not explicitly state that the second switch 414 is activated when the second clock CLK90 is in a low state [the claimed “second logic state”], this step is implied because the second switch 414 is activated at the opposite clock timing of the multiplexer 410); and a third switch (Figure 6, item 412; i.e., another multiplexer) connected between a second input node (Figure 6, see input to multiplexer 412) and a second node (Figure 6, see output from multiplexer 412), and configured to receive the second input clock signal at the second input node and operate in response to a second logic state of the first input clock signal (Column 6, lines 7-10; i.e., the transistor 416 is said to be activated based on a high state of first clock signal CLK; further, the third switch 412, which receives a control input from first clock CLK, is activated at the opposite clock timing of the transistor 416; this would indicate that the third switch 412 is activated when the first clock signal CLK is at a low state [the claimed “second logic state of the first input clock signal”]). Regarding Claim 20, Keeth discloses a first inverter (Figure 6, see second inverter located at the output of multiplexer 410) connected between the first node and a first output node (Figure 6, item 418) that outputs an output clock signal (Figure 6, item CLK0); and a second inverter (Figure 6, see second inverter located at the output of multiplexer 412) connected between the second node and a second output node that outputs an inverted output clock signal (Figure 6, item CLK1*; i.e., as shown in Figure 7, the output clock CLK1* is inverted at least at certain points in time with respect to the output clock CLK0), wherein a phase of the second input clock signal is delayed by 90 degrees with respect to a phase of the first input clock signal (Column 5, lines 16-18), and wherein the first logic state indicates a logical low level and the second logic state indicates a logical high level (Column 6, lines 2-4; i.e., although the reference appears to state that the first logic state is high and the second logic state is low, it would have been a matter of obvious design choice to reverse these states [it would have been within the level of one of ordinary skill in the art to update the circuitry in Figure 6, e.g., by adding or removing certain inverters to make this change]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-14 and 16-18 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding Claim 1, the prior art of record does not teach “wherein a voltage level of the power voltage of the power node is higher than a voltage level of a ground node, wherein the first PMOS transistor is configured to generate a voltage waveform at the first node with the first switch in response to the second input clock signal, and wherein a duty of the voltage waveform at the first node is longer than a duty of the first input clock signal.” Regarding Claim 16, the prior art of record does not teach “a clock converting circuit comprising: a first clock circuit configured to generate a first output clock signal based on a first input clock signal and a second input clock signal; a second clock circuit configured to generate a second output clock signal based on the second input clock signal and a third input clock signal; a third clock circuit configured to generate a third output clock signal based on the third input clock signal and a fourth input clock signal; and a fourth clock circuit configured to generate a fourth output clock signal based on the first input clock signal and the fourth input clock signal”, in conjunction with the other limitations in the claim. Keeth discloses a first and second clock circuit as claimed, but does not disclose a third and fourth clock circuit as claimed. All claims that are not specifically addressed are allowable due to a dependency. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAISAL M ZAMAN, ESQ. whose telephone number is (571)272-6495. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8 am - 5 pm, alternate Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrew J. Jung can be reached on 571-270-3779. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAISAL M ZAMAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2175
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 11, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 12, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 04, 2024
Response Filed
Apr 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 29, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 07, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 14, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 14, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 29, 2025
Interview Requested
Jan 05, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 05, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12578780
CIRCUIT SLEEP METHOD AND SLEEP CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572490
LINKS FOR PLANARIZED DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560993
POWER MANAGEMENT OF DEVICES WITH DIFFERENTIATED POWER SCALING BASED ON RELATIVE POWER BENEFIT ESTIMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561267
Multiple Independent On-chip Interconnect
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562599
Contactless Power Feeder
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 917 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month