Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/197,730

INPUT-SENSING UNIT, FABRICATING METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY DEVICE THEREWITH

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 16, 2023
Examiner
KIM, PAUL D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1346 granted / 1537 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1589
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1537 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: --METHOD OF FABRICATING AN INPUT-SENSING UNIT--. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Matsunage (US PAT. 11,495,397) in view of Harada (PGPub 2022/0041775 A1). Matsunage teaches a process of fabricating an input-sensing unit, comprising: forming a first conductive layer (41, Fig. 2, col. 3, lines 52-60) on an inorganic layer (11, col. 3, lines 8-17); supplying and curing an organic layer compound (32, Fig. 2, col. 3, lines 52-60) on the first conductive layer to form a first organic layer; forming a second conductive layer (42, Fig. 2) on the first organic layer (32); and supplying and curing the organic layer compound (34) on the second conductive layer to form a second organic layer as shown in Fig. 2 (col. 3, lines 52-60 and col. 7, lines 56-64). Matsunage also teaches that the organic layer compound is an epoxy resin (as a base resin, as per claim 2, col. 5, lines 13-18). However, Matsunage silent a hollow polymer used for the organic layer compound. Harada teaches a hollow polymer particles used for a resin compositions in order to provide an excellent mechanical strength (paragraphs [0070]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify an organic layer compound in a process of fabricating an input-sensing unit of Matsunage by a hollow polymer used for the organic layer compound as taught by Harada in order to provide an excellent mechanical strength. Re. claim 3: Harada also teaches that the hollow polymer comprises a shell that defines a hollow therein; and the shell comprises epoxy resin (paragraph [0070]). Re. claim 4: Harada also teaches that a content of the hollow polymer in the organic layer compound ranges from about 10 wt % to about 70 wt % (paragraph (0071) and [0076]). Re. claim 5: Harada also teaches that the organic layer compound is cured using heat (paragraph [0085]). Re. claim 6: Matsunage also teaches that a plurality of penetration hole (51, 52) is formed in the first organic layer, after the forming of the first organic layer, thereby via wires (51, 52) are formed to connect between conductor layers as shown in Fig. 2 (col. 3, lines 52-65 and col. 4, lines 25-51). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Matsunage as applied to claim 1 above, in view of Harada, and further in view of Kinsho et al. (PGPub 2005/0031871 A1). Matsunage, modified by Harada, teaches all limitations as set forth above, but silent a dispersing agent or a curing initiator for the organic layer compound. Kinsho et al. teach a composite resin particle including a dispersing agent or a curing initiator in order to provide the well-known benefit of curing the resin when the resin composition is coated on an electronic part (see also abstract and paragraph [0177]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify an organic layer compound in a process of fabricating an input-sensing unit of Matsunage, modified by Harada, by a dispersing agent or a curing initiator for the organic layer compound as taught by a dispersing agent or a curing initiator for the organic layer compound in order to cure the resin when the resin composition is coated on an electronic part. The Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. YEH et al. (PGPub 2015/0291802 A1), Watanabe et al. (US PAT. 9,734,901), and Mukherjee et al. (PGPub 2004/0124438) are cited to further show the state of the art with respect to a method of fabricating an input-sensing unit. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL D KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4565. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:00 AM-2:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aneeta Yodichkas can be reached at 571-272-9773. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL D KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603212
METHOD OF MAKING A SHIELDED INDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597553
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SURFACE-MOUNT INDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597550
Optimized Electromagnetic Inductor Component Design and Methods Including Improved Conductivity Composite Conductor Material
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588944
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A TIP ELECTRODE OF AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588178
PRODUCTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1537 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month