Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/200,931

SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 23, 2023
Examiner
DOAN, THERESA T
Art Unit
2814
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
791 granted / 896 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
920
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 896 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-7 and 16-20 in the reply filed on 01/29/26 is acknowledged. By this election, claims 8-15 are withdrawn and claims 1-7 and 16-20 will be examined in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Shi et al. (2023/0335636). Regarding claim 1, Shi (Figs. 4-7) discloses a semiconductor structure, comprising: a substrate 302 (Fig. 7, [0054]); a body region 306 and a drift region 304 in the substrate 302; a first gate structure 402 over the body region 306 and the drift region 304 ([0066]); a second gate structure 404 over the drift region ([0066]); a source 308 in the body region 306; and a drain 310 in the drift region 304 ([0058]), the first gate structure 402 being between the source 308 and the drain 310, and the second gate structure 404 being between the first gate structure 402 and the drain 310 (Fig.7). Regarding claim 2, Shi (Fig. 7) discloses wherein the second gate structure 404 is arranged in an isolation trench 702 in the drift region 304. Regarding claim 3, Shi (Figs. 4-7) discloses wherein the second gate structure 404 includes a dielectric layer 702 between a gate electrode 404 of the second gate structure and a bottom surface of the isolation trench (Fig. 7, [0072]). Regarding claim 4, Shi (Fig. 7) discloses wherein the dielectric layer 702 penetrates partially through the substrate 302. Regarding claim 5, Shi (Figs. 4-7) discloses wherein the drift region 304 is adjacent to the body region 306. Regarding claim 6, Shi (Figs. 4-7) discloses wherein a gate electrode (G2) of the second gate structure 404 is reversely biased ([0050]). Regarding claim 7, Shi (Figs. 4-7) discloses wherein a gate electrode (G2) of the second gate structure 404 is isolated electrically. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 16-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shi et al. (2023/0335636) in view of Yang et al. (2024/0347626). Regarding claim 16, Shi (Figs. 4-7) discloses a semiconductor structure, comprising: a substrate 302 (Fig. 7, [0054]); a body region 306 and a drift region 304 in the substrate 302; a gate structure 402 having a gate electrode (G1) over the body region 306 and the drift region 304 ([0066]); a first dielectric layer 320 between the gate electrode G1 and the body 306 and drift regions 304 (Figs. 3C and 7, [0060]); a dielectric structure including a second dielectric layer 702 penetrating through the drift region 702 ([0072]); a source 308 in the body region 306 ([0057]); and a drain 310 in the drift region 304 ([0058]), the gate structure 404 being between the source 308 and the drain 310, and the dielectric structure 702 being between the gate structure G2 and the drain 310 (Figs. 3A and 7, [0072]). Shi discloses all the claimed limitations as discussed above except for the first and second dielectric layers having a same structure. Yang (Figs. 3E-3F) discloses a gate structure 350a having a gate electrode 340a over the body region 304a and the drift region 304b ([0066]); a first dielectric layer 330 between the gate electrode 340a and the body 304a and drift regions 304b (Figs. 3F, [0060]); a dielectric structure including a second dielectric layer (332, 334) wherein the first and second dielectric layers (330, 332, 334) having a same material (silicon dioxide) and a same structure (Fig. 3E, [0060]) in order to provide the semiconductor devices that designed for an intended purpose. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the device of Shi by forming the first and second dielectric layers having a same structure, as taught by Yang in order to provide the semiconductor devices that designed for an intended purpose (Figs. 3E-3F, [0060]). Regarding claim 17, Shi (Figs. 4-7) discloses wherein the dielectric structure 702 is formed in an isolation trench 702 in the drift region 304, the isolation trench 702 penetrating through the drift region 304. Regarding claim 18, as discussed, the combination above, Yang (Figs. 3E-3F) discloses wherein the first and second dielectric layers (330, 332, 334) are formed concurrently. Regarding claim 19, Shi (Figs. 4-7) discloses wherein the drift region 304 is adjacent to the body region 306. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 20 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record fails to disclose all the limitations recited in the above claim. Specifically, the prior art of record fails to disclose wherein the dielectric structure includes a dielectric body over the second dielectric layer in the isolation trench. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THERESA T DOAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1704. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday from 7:00AM - 3:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, WAEL FAHMY can be reached on (571) 272-1705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THERESA T DOAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2814
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598750
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593718
MEMORY SYSTEM PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593636
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588511
SHIELDING ASSEMBLY FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588527
DIELECTRIC INTERPOSER WITH ELECTRICAL-CONNECTION CUT-IN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 896 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month