Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/207,162

SEPARATOR AND RELATED SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK AND POWER CONSUMPTION APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jun 08, 2023
Priority
Jan 17, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022072330
Examiner
LI, AIQUN
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
529 granted / 828 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
868
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
75.1%
+35.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 828 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-8 are pending as amended on 6 April 2026. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Applicant’s amendments to the claims and the remarks/arguments have been entered and fully considered. Response to Amendment and Arguments Applicant’s amendment overcomes the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph of claim 2. The rejection has been withdrawn. Applicant’s amendment overcomes the rejection of claims 1 and 5-8 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) over US2022/0059909A1(Lee), the rejection of claim 2 under 35 U.S.C. 103 over Lee in view of US2015/0372277A1 (Honda), and the rejection of claims 3 and 4 under 35 U.S.C. 103 over Lee in view of US2020/0168872A1(Fu). The rejections have been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments in light of the amendment have been fully considered but are moot as they do not apply to the current rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US2015/0056491A1(Zhao). Regarding claim 1, Zhao teaches a separator for a lithium battery ([0044]) comprises a porous substrate; and an organic/inorganic composite porous coating coated on at least one surface of the porous substrate; the organic/inorganic composite porous coating comprises inorganic particles and organic particles with at least two swelling degrees ([0007]), wherein the organic/inorganic composite porous coating may be an island-planar shape, the island-planar shape comprises island regions and planar regions, taking an average swelling degree as a reference, the organic particles with the swelling degree not less than the average swelling degree are mainly distributed on a surface of the island regions, thus close to 100wt.% of the island, which meets the claimed discrete second regions; and the inorganic particles and the organic particles with the swelling degree less than the average swelling degree are mainly distributed inside the island regions and on the planar regions ([0008] and Fig. 1), which meets the first region; and the coating has one thickness thus anticipates same coating thickness of different region ([0058]). Regarding claim 2, Zhao teaches the organic particles include polyvinylidene fluoride ([0022]). Regarding claims 3 and 4, Zhao teaches exemplified the inorganic particles in an amount of 28 g mixed with 2.66 g of organic particles of less swelling and 0.06 parts of adhesive ([0057]), thus about 91% of inorganic particles and 8.6% of particles in the planar region, respectively, estimated by the examiner, which meets the claimed amount of inorganic particles and first polymer, respectively. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao in view of US Patent 5989743 (Yamashita). The teachings of Zhao are set forth above. Zhao further teaches forming a secondary battery by winding the separator, a positive electrode and a negative electrode together ([0055]), which meets battery/module/pack/apparatus. Zhao teaches that the existence of the island regions provides spaces for expansion of the electrochemical device so as to excellently solve the deformation problem of the battery ([0015] and [0048]). Zhao does not expressly discloses that the island region is provided at a corner of an innermost circle of the winding assembly. Yamashita teaches in a wound battery, the innermost portion of separator sustains a largest stress as compared to other portions of the wound battery dues to deformation (col. 8, line 20-25 and col. 16, line 40-45). At the time the invention was made it would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to place the island region of the separator at a corner of the an innermost cycle of the wound assembly to solve the deformation problem since the innermost portion of separator of a wound battery sustains a largest stress as compared to other portions of the wound battery dues to deformation as evidenced by Yamashita (col. 8, line 20-25 and col. 16, line 40-45). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AIQUN LI whose telephone number is (571)270-7736. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am -4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at 571-2721302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AIQUN LI/Ph.D., Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637605
LIGNIN-BASED COMPOSITIONS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12609324
LITHIUM-ION BATTERY AND FORMATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12600894
LIGNIN-BASED DRILLING FLUIDS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597596
NANO-SILICON-GRAPHITE COMPOSITE NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL WITH CARBON COATING AND ALUMINUM METAPHOSPHATE COMPOSITE MODIFICATION LAYER ON SURFACE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592654
MOISTURE ENABLED ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION MATERIALS AND DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+22.4%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 828 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month