Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/210,618

BLINK ANIMATION PROJECTOR AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 15, 2023
Examiner
LE, BAO-LUAN Q
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mindscope Products
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
514 granted / 980 resolved
-15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1035
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
89.8%
+49.8% vs TC avg
§102
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 980 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status The filing on 03/10/2026 amended claims 1, 7, 10 and cancelled claim 2. Claims 1 and 3-11 are pending and rejected on new grounds of rejections necessitated by the amendments of claims 1 and 10. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1 and 3-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 10 limit the projector to have a lens array/ two or more lenses where each lens of the lens array/two or more lenses has an image printed thereon and a film array. On the other hand, the specification discloses “an image may be printed directly on the back of lens to eliminate the need for a separate strip of film;” hence there is no support in the specification, as originally filed, for the projector to have both lens array with an image printed thereon and film array. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 3-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 10 recites the limitation “the light array, reflector array, and film array” on line 12 of claim 1 and line 14 of claim 10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the “film array” limitation in the claims. Claims 3-9 and 11 depend, directly or indirectly, on claims 1 and 10; hence they are also rejected. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1 and 10 have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection necessitated by the amendment/s of claims 1 and 10. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAO-LUAN Q LE whose telephone number is (571)270-5362. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday; 9:00AM-5:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached on (571) 272 230303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 Or faxed to: (571) 273-8300, (for formal communications intended for entry) Or: (571) 273-7490, (for informal or draft communications, please label “PROPOSED” or “DRAFT”) Hand-delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 /BAO-LUAN Q LE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 15, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 10, 2026
Response Filed
May 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678706
REACTIVE SHOW ACTION EQUIPMENT SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675036
HEAT CONDUCTION UNIT FOR LIGHT VALVE AND PROJECTION DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669744
PROJECTOR WITH IMPROVED ARRANGEMENT OF COOLING MECHANISM
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12656610
NEAR FOCUS CORRECTIVE AR GLASSES
5y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659639
DAMPING STRUCTURE AND PROJECTION DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+16.8%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 980 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month