Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/212,916

LIGHT-EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 22, 2023
Priority
Nov 14, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0151391
Examiner
SCHOENHOLTZ, JOSEPH
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1197 granted / 1312 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1325
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
74.3%
+34.3% vs TC avg
§102
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1312 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on May 11, 2026 has been entered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings submitted on June 22, 2023 have been reviewed and accepted by the Examiner. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS), filed on May 11, 2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosed therein has been considered by the Examiner. Note: The Korean office action has not been considered owing to no English translation. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of paper submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) which has been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 13 which depends indirectly upon claim 1 and recites ‘further comprising a trench between the end of the power line and the second part of the planarization layer’, it appears to Examiner that Applicant is referring to the trench recited in claim 1, else the drawings are defective. In the alternative, it is unclear what distinguishes a trench in claim 1 from a trench in claim 13. Appropriate clarification is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 and 14-21 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 1 the prior art does not teach the device of claim 1, wherein a trench is disposed in the second portion of the non-active area between the power line and the planarization layer in the third portion of the non- active area. Claims 3-12 and 14-20 depend directly or indirectly on claim 1 and are allowable on that basis. Regarding claim 21 the prior art does not teach the device of claim 21, comprising one or more dams disposed in the second portion of the non-active area. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Joe Schoenholtz whose telephone number is (571)270-5475. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thur 7 AM to 7 PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ms. Yara Green can be reached at (571) 272-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.E. Schoenholtz/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 22, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 09, 2025
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677552
DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE DISPLAY PANEL
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677707
Bio sensing device
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677523
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677554
BENDING AREA SIGNAL WIRE AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677495
IMAGE SENSORS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (-4.9%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month