Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/213,894

SACRIFICIAL PASSIVATION FILM DEPOSITION METHOD, TRENCH ETCHING METHOD AND SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING APPARATUS USING LOW-TEMPERATURE ALD PROCESS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 26, 2023
Examiner
CULBERT, ROBERTS P
Art Unit
1716
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Semes Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
659 granted / 809 resolved
+16.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
829
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 19 and 20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11/20/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 11 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by, or in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent 9,385,318 to Henri. Regarding Claim 1, Henri teaches a sacrificial passivation film deposition method using a low-temperature atomic layer deposition (ALD) process, comprising: depositing a primary sacrificial passivation film (109) on an entire surface of a substrate using a thermal ALD (T-ALD) process (Col. 8, Lines 39-47 and Col. 12, Lines15-67); and additionally depositing a secondary sacrificial passivation film (110) on an upper surface and at least a portion of a side surface of an upper portion of the primary sacrificial passivation film using a plasma-ALD (P-ALD) process (Col. 13, Line 1 - Col. 14, Line 22) Regarding Claim 1, Henri teaches the method of the invention substantially as claimed with sufficient specificity, however, it further would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to perform the first forming step with thermal ALD (T-ALD) process and the second forming step with plasma-ALD (P-ALD) process in order to suitably form the layers while protecting the underlying material with predictable results. Regarding Claim 2, Henri teaches the depositing of the primary sacrificial passivation film and the depositing of secondary sacrificial passivation film are performed at a low-temperature of 150°C or less (Col. 12, Lines 31-34 and Col. 13, Lines 21-24) with sufficient specificity, however, it further would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the claimed invention to perform the first forming step with thermal ALD (T-ALD) process and the second forming step with plasma-ALD (P-ALD) process at a low-temperature of 150°C or less in order to suitably form the layers while protecting the underlying material with predictable results. Regarding Claim 11, Henri teaches depositing a target layer on a substrate, etching a portion of the target layer and completing etching of the target layer (Fig 2A-2E) wherein the etching of the portion of the target layer includes: depositing a primary sacrificial passivation film (109) on an entire surface of the target layer using a thermal ALD (T-ALD) process (Col. 8, Lines 39-47 and Col. 12, Lines15-67); and additionally depositing a secondary sacrificial passivation film (110) on an upper surface and a side surface of an upper portion of the primary sacrificial passivation film using a plasma-ALD (P-ALD) process (Col. 13, Line 1 - Col. 14, Line 22). Regarding Claim 11, Henri teaches the method of the invention substantially as claimed with sufficient specificity, however, it further would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to perform the first forming step with thermal ALD (T-ALD) process and the second forming step with plasma-ALD (P-ALD) process in order to suitably form the layers while protecting the underlying material with predictable results. Regarding Claim 12, Henri teaches (Fig 2A-2F) the primary sacrificial passivation film and the secondary sacrificial passivation film are deposited on the target layer of which the portion is etched. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-10 and 13-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The Prior Art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Publication 2016/0163561 to Hudson et al. teaches a method of forming a recessed feature in dielectric material on a semiconductor substrate. Separate etching and deposition operations are employed in a cyclic manner. Each etching operation partially etches the feature. Each deposition operation forms a protective coating on the sidewalls of the feature to prevent lateral etch of the dielectric material during the etching operations. The protective coating may be deposited using methods that result in formation of the protective coating along substantially the entire length of the sidewalls. The protective coating may be deposited using particular reactants and/or reaction mechanisms that result in substantially complete sidewall coating at relatively low temperatures without the use of plasma. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Roberts P Culbert whose telephone number is (571)272-1433. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Thursday 7:30 AM-6 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Parviz Hassanzadeh can be reached at 571-272-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERTS P CULBERT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1716
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598928
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR SELECTIVELY ETCHING SILICON OXIDE FILMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584039
SLURRY COMPOSITION FOR A CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577466
PHOTORESIST DEVELOPMENT WITH ORGANIC VAPOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575352
ETCHING METHOD AND ETCHING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12575353
METHOD FOR LATERAL ETCH WITH BOTTOM PASSIVATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-3.6%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month