Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/215,794

IN-SITU FLUIDIC INSPECTION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Examiner
SHI, TINGCHEN
Art Unit
1796
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Illumina, Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
96 granted / 137 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
180
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 137 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/02/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-6, 9-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dothie et al (US20150044696A1 published 02/12/2015; hereinafter Dothie) in view of Bohm et al (WO2015187868A2 published 12/10/2015; hereinafter Bohm). Regarding claim 1, Dothie teaches an apparatus (a point-of-care diagnostic testing system – paragraph 310), comprising: a fluidic cartridge (a microfluidic device – paragraph 1) carrying a flow cell (a sixth fluidic conduit 30 – Figs. 7A-C) and to be received by the cartridge receptacle (the microfluidic device is capable of being received in a cartridge receptacle – Figs. 7A-C), the fluidic cartridge comprising: a rotary valve (a rotating valve 10 – Figs. 7A-C) comprising a rotary channel (a fluidic channel 12 – Figs. 7A-C); a common channel (fifth fluidic conduit 28 – Figs. 7A-C) fluidly coupled to the rotary channel (fifth fluidic conduit 28 coupled to the fluidic channel 12 – Figs. 7A-C), the flow cell to be fluidly coupled to the common channel (the sixth fluidic conduit 30 is coupled to the fluidic channel 12 – Figs. 7A-C); a first well (a sixth fluidic chamber 54 – Figs. 7A-C) and a second well (a fifth fluidic chamber 52 – Figs. 7A-C), each of the first well (a channel between the sixth fluidic chamber 54 and a sensor 104 – Figs. 7A-C) and the second well comprising a well channel (a conduit 106 connected to the fifth fluidic chamber 52 conduit 106 – Fig. 7C); and a pump carried by the fluidics cartridge (a third moveable piston 82 and a stepper motor 110 – Figs. 7A-C), wherein the pump is positioned downstream of the flow cell (the third moveable piston 82 is downstream of the sixth fluidic conduit 30 – Figs. 7A-C). However, Dothie does not teach an instrument, comprising: a cartridge receptacle; and a rotary valve drive assembly; a pressure source; and wherein the rotary valve drive assembly is to interface with the rotary valve to rotate the rotary valve to align the rotary channel with the well channel of the first well and to fluidly couple the common channel and the well channel of the first well, and wherein: a) the pressure source is positioned upstream of the first well and upstream of the rotary valve when the fluidic cartridge is received by the cartridge receptacle, and b) the pressure source is to pressurize the first well and to flow fluid from the first well, through the well channel and the common channel and to the flow cell. Bohm teaches a system and method for controlling a rotary valve comprising an instrument (a base instrument 102 with a system controller 180 – Fig. 1), comprising: a cartridge receptacle (a control side 198 configured to separably engage the mating side 114 of the removable cartridge 104 – Fig. 1); and a rotary valve drive assembly (a valve actuator 183 comprising a rotating motor 189 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1); a pressure source (a system pump 119 may be configured to provide positive pressure – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1); and wherein the rotary valve drive assembly is to interface with the rotary valve to rotate the rotary valve to align the rotary channel (a first rotational position – paragraph 81) with the well channel of the first well (a sample port 116 and a sample channel 131 connected to a sample-preparation region 132 – Fig. 1) (in the first rotational position the rotary valve 123 is connected to the sample ports 116 via the sample channel 131 and the sample-preparation region 132 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1) and to fluidly couple the common channel (a reaction chamber channel from the rotary valve 123 to a reaction chamber 126 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1) and the well channel of the first well (in the first rotational position the reaction chamber channel is connected to the sample channel 131 via the sample-preparation region 132 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1), and wherein: a) the pressure source is positioned upstream of the first well and upstream of the rotary valve when the fluidic cartridge is received by the cartridge receptacle (the system pump 119 is capable of providing positive pressure and is therefore deemed upstream of the sample port 116 and the rotary valve 123 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1), and b) the pressure source is to pressurize the first well and to flow fluid from the first well, through the well channel and the common channel and to the flow cell (the system pump 119 is capable of pressurizing the sample port 116 to flow a sample from the sample port 116, to the sample channel 131, to the reaction chamber channel, and then to the reaction chamber 126 – paragraph 81). Bohm teaches to use the system 100 to gain the ability to process data be automatically and allow a remote request through a communication link (paragraph 86). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the cartridge, as taught by Dothie, with the system and instrument, taught by Bohm, to gain the ability to process data automatically and allow a remote request through a communication link. One of ordinary skill would have expected that this modification could have been performed with a reasonable expectation of success because Dothie and Bohm teach fluidic cartridges. Regarding claim 2, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instrument comprises the pressure source (the system pump 119 in the base 102 – Bohm paragraph 81 and Fig. 1) and wherein the pressure source comprises a second pump (the system pump 119 – Bohm paragraph 81 and Fig. 1). Regarding claim 3, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the fluid comprises air (gas is vented through the first integral air vent 88 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C and paragraph 175). Regarding claim 4, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the fluidic cartridge comprises a flow cell chamber (a chamber in a sensor 104 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C) and the flow cell is to be received by the flow cell chamber (the sixth fluidic conduit 30 is received by the chamber in the sensor 104 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C). Regarding claim 5, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first well comprises reagent (the sixth fluidic chamber 54 containing the defined volume of quench reagent 134 – Dothie paragraph 212). Regarding claim 6, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 5, wherein the reagent comprises liquid reagent (the quench reagent 134 is a liquid – Dothie paragraph 216). Regarding claim 9, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instrument comprises an actuator to actuate the pump (the base 102 comprising a contact array 188 of electrical contacts capable of actuating the stepper motor 110 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C and Bohm Fig. 1). Regarding claim 10, Dothie teaches an apparatus (a point-of-care diagnostic testing system – paragraph 310), comprising: a fluidic cartridge (a microfluidic device – paragraph 1) carrying a flow cell (a sixth fluidic conduit 30 – Figs. 7A-C) and to be received by the cartridge receptacle (the microfluidic device is capable of being received in a cartridge receptacle – Figs. 7A-C), the fluidic cartridge comprising: a well (a sixth fluidic chamber 54 – Figs. 7A-C); a well channel coupled to the well (a channel between the sixth fluidic chamber 54 and a sensor 104 – Figs. 7A-C), a common channel (fifth fluidic conduit 28 – Figs. 7A-C); a valve (a rotating valve 10 – Figs. 7A-C); and a pump carried by the fluidics cartridge (a third moveable piston 82 – Figs. 7A-C), wherein the pump is to be positioned downstream of the flow cell (the third moveable piston 82 is downstream of the sixth fluidic conduit 30 – Figs. 7A-C), wherein the valve is actuatable to fluidly couple the well channel and the common channel (the valve 10 is capable of connecting the channel between the sixth fluidic chamber 54 and a sensor 104 to the fifth fluidic conduit 28 – Figs. 7A-C). However, Dothie does not teach an instrument comprising a cartridge receptacle; a pressure source; and wherein: a) the pressure source is positioned upstream of the well and upstream of the valve when the fluidic cartridge is received by the cartridge receptacle, and b) the pressure source is to pressurize the well and to flow fluid from the well, through the well channel and the common channel and to the flow cell. Bohm teaches a system and method for controlling a rotary valve comprising an instrument (a base instrument 102 with a system controller 180 – Fig. 1) comprising a cartridge receptacle (a control side 198 configured to separably engage the mating side 114 of the removable cartridge 104 – Fig. 1); a pressure source (a system pump 119 may be configured to provide positive pressure – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1); and wherein a) the pressure source is positioned upstream of the well and upstream of the valve when the fluidic cartridge is received by the cartridge receptacle (the system pump 119 is capable of providing positive pressure and is therefore deemed upstream of the sample port 116 and the rotary valve 123 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1), and b) the pressure source is to pressurize the well and to flow fluid from the well, through the well channel and the common channel and to the flow cell (the system pump 119 is capable of pressurizing the sample port 116 to flow a sample from the sample port 116, to the sample channel 131, to the reaction chamber channel, and then to the reaction chamber 126 – paragraph 81). Bohm teaches to use the system 100 to gain the ability to process data be automatically (paragraph 86). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the cartridge, as taught by Dothie, with the system and instrument, taught by Bohm, to gain the ability to process data be automatically. One of ordinary skill would have expected that this modification could have been performed with a reasonable expectation of success because Dothie and Bohm teach fluidic cartridges. Regarding claim 11, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 10, wherein the instrument comprises the pressure source (the system pump 119 in the base 102 – Bohm paragraph 81 and Fig. 1) and wherein the pressure source comprises a second pump (the system pump 119 – Bohm paragraph 81 and Fig. 1). Regarding claim 12, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 10, wherein the fluid comprises air (gas is vented through the first integral air vent 88 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C and paragraph 175). Regarding claim 13, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 10, wherein the fluidic cartridge comprises a flow cell chamber (a chamber in a sensor 104 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C) and the flow cell is to be received by the flow cell chamber (the sixth fluidic conduit 30 is received by the chamber in the sensor 104 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C). Regarding claim 14, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 10, wherein the well comprises reagent (the sixth fluidic chamber 54 containing the defined volume of quench reagent 134 – Dothie paragraph 212). Regarding claim 15, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 14, wherein the reagent comprises liquid reagent (the quench reagent 134 is a liquid – Dothie paragraph 216). Regarding claim 16, Dothie, modified by Bohm, teaches the apparatus of claim 10, the valve comprises a rotatory valve (a rotating valve 10 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C), the fluidic cartridge comprises a second well (a fifth fluidic chamber 52 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C) having a second well channel (a conduit 106 connected to the fifth fluidic chamber 52 conduit 106 – Dothie Fig. 7C). However, Dothie, modified by Bohm, does not teach wherein the instrument comprises a rotary valve drive assembly, and wherein the rotary valve drive assembly is to interface with the rotary valve to rotate the rotatory valve to align the rotary channel with the second well channel of the second well and to fluidly couple the common channel and the second well channel of the second well. Bohm a system and method for controlling a rotary valve comprising wherein the instrument (a base instrument 102 with a system controller 180 – Fig. 1) comprises a rotary valve drive assembly (a valve actuator 183 comprising a rotating motor 189 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1), wherein the rotary valve drive assembly is to interface with the rotary valve to rotate the rotatory valve to align the rotary channel (a first rotational position – paragraph 81) with the second well channel of the second well (a sample port 116 and a sample channel 131 connected to a sample-preparation region 132 – Fig. 1) (in the first rotational position the rotary valve 123 is connected to the sample ports 116 via the sample channel 131 and the sample-preparation region 132 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1) and to fluidly couple the common channel (a reaction chamber channel from the rotary valve 123 to a reaction chamber 126 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1) and the second well channel of the second well (the first rotational position the reaction chamber channel is connected to the sample channel 131 via the sample-preparation region 132 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1). Bohm teaches to use the system 100 to gain the ability to allow a remote request through a communication link (paragraph 86). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the cartridge, as taught by Dothie as modified by Bohm, with the base instrument 102 and the system controller 180, taught by Bohm, to gain the ability to allow a remote request through a communication link. One of ordinary skill would have expected that this modification could have been performed with a reasonable expectation of success because Dothie and Bohm teach fluidic cartridges. Claims 17-19 and 22-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dothie in view of Bohm and Heiniger et al (US20060177351A1 published 8/10/2006; hereinafter Heiniger). Regarding claim 17, Dothie teaches an apparatus (a point-of-care diagnostic testing system – paragraph 310), comprising: a fluidic cartridge (a microfluidic device – paragraph 1) carrying a flow cell (a sixth fluidic conduit 30 – Figs. 7A-C) and to be received by the cartridge receptacle (the microfluidic device is capable of being received in a cartridge receptacle – Figs. 7A-C), the fluidic cartridge comprising: a rotary valve (a rotating valve 10 – Figs. 7A-C) comprising a rotary channel (a fluidic channel 12 – Figs. 7A-C); a common channel (fifth fluidic conduit 28 – Figs. 7A-C) fluidly coupled to the rotary channel (fifth fluidic conduit 28 coupled to the fluidic channel 12 – Figs. 7A-C), the flow cell is to be fluidly coupled to the common channel (the sixth fluidic conduit 30 is coupled to the fluidic channel 12 – Figs. 7A-C); a first well (a sixth fluidic chamber 54 – Figs. 7A-C) and a second well (a fifth fluidic chamber 52 – Figs. 7A-C), each of the first well (a channel between the sixth fluidic chamber 54 and a sensor 104 – Figs. 7A-C) and the second well comprising a well channel (a conduit 106 connected to the fifth fluidic chamber 52 conduit 106 – Fig. 7C); and a pump carried by the fluidics cartridge (a third moveable piston 82 – Figs. 7A-C), wherein the pump is to be positioned downstream of the flow cell (the third moveable piston 82 is downstream of the sixth fluidic conduit 30 – Figs. 7A-C), However, Dothie does not teach an instrument comprising, a cartridge receptacle; a rotary valve drive assembly; and an in-situ testing assembly comprising a sensor; a pressure source; and wherein: a) the pressure source is positioned upstream of the first well and upstream of the rotary valve when the fluidic cartridge is received by the cartridge receptacle, b) the pressure source is to pressurize the first well and the sensor is to measure a parameter value, and c) the instrument is programed to use the parameter value to determine a presence of a leak or a blockage within the cartridge or the instrument. Bohm teaches a system and method for controlling a rotary valve comprising an instrument (a base instrument 102 with a system controller 180 – Fig. 1) comprising, a cartridge receptacle (a control side 198 configured to separably engage the mating side 114 of the removable cartridge 104 – Fig. 1); a rotary valve drive assembly (a valve actuator 183 comprising a rotating motor 189 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1); and an in-situ testing assembly comprising a sensor (a detector to observe the biological sample – paragraph 50); a pressure source (a system pump 119 may be configured to provide positive pressure – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1); and wherein: a) the pressure source is positioned upstream of the first well and upstream of the rotary valve when the fluidic cartridge is received by the cartridge receptacle (the system pump 119 is capable of providing positive pressure and is therefore deemed upstream of the sample port 116 and the rotary valve 123 – paragraph 81 and Fig. 1), b) the pressure source is to pressurize the first well (the system pump 119 is capable of pressurizing the sample port 116 – paragraph 81) and the sensor is to measure a parameter value (detecting the designated reactions, and/or analyzing the designated reactions – paragraph 50) (system failure or malfunction has been detected – paragraph 49). Bohm teaches to use the system 100 to gain the ability to process data be automatically and allow a remote request through a communication link (paragraph 86). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the cartridge, as taught by Dothie, with the system and instrument, taught by Bohm, to gain the ability to process data be automatically and allow a remote request through a communication link. One of ordinary skill would have expected that this modification could have been performed with a reasonable expectation of success because Dothie and Bohm teach fluidic cartridges. However, Dothie, modified by Bohm, does not teach the instrument is programed to use the parameter value to determine a presence of a leak or a blockage within the cartridge or the instrument. Heiniger teaches a fluidic system wherein the instrument is programed to use the parameter value to determine a presence of a leak (if a leak were to occur in the dialysis membrane inside the tissue, the measurement liquid would flow out of the flow system and into the tissue. A malfunction of this kind can be determined, for example, by the associated drop in pressure or complete loss of pressure in the flow system – paragraph 5). Heiniger also teaches in the event of such a leak it is desirable to suppress the flow of liquid (paragraph 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the device, as taught by Dothie as modified by Bohm, with the leak detection flow system, taught by Heiniger, to suppress the flow of liquid during a leak. One of ordinary skill would have expected that this modification could have been performed with a reasonable expectation of success because Dothie, Bohm, Heiniger teach microfluidic cartridges for sample processing. Regarding claim 18, Dothie, as modified by Bohm modified by Heiniger, teaches the apparatus of claim 17, wherein the parameter value comprises a pressure value (measuring a control parameter, for example the pressure in the fluid system – Heiniger paragraph 4). Regarding claim 19, Dothie, as modified by Bohm modified by Heiniger, teaches the apparatus of claim 17, further comprising a rotary valve drive assembly (a valve actuator 183 comprising a rotating motor 189 – Bohm paragraph 81 and Fig. 1) to interface with the rotary valve to rotate the rotary valve and the rotary channel relative to the well channels of the first well and the second well (the valve actuator 183 to move the movable valve 123 to a first rotational position relative to the cartridge 104 – Bohm paragraph 81). Regarding claim 22, Dothie, as modified by Bohm modified by Heiniger, teaches the apparatus of claim 17, wherein the instrument comprises an actuator to actuate the pump (the base 102 comprising a contact array 188 of electrical contacts capable of actuating the stepper motor 110 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C and Bohm Fig. 1). Regarding claim 23, Dothie, as modified by Bohm modified by Heiniger, teaches the apparatus of claim 17, further comprising a first valve (a first moveable piston 78 capable of stopping flow – Dothie Figs. 7A-C) and a second valve (a second moveable piston 80 capable of stopping flow – Dothie Figs. 7A-C), the valve positioned between the first valve and the second valve (the rotating valve 10 is between the first moveable piston 78 and the second moveable piston 80 – Dothie Figs. 7A-C). Response to Arguments Applicant’s addition arguments with respect to the 102/103 rejections of the claims have been considered, and due to amendments to the claims, a new rejection using different references is set forth above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TINGCHEN SHI whose telephone number is (571)272-2538. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Elizabeth Robinson can be reached at 5712727129. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.C.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1796 /ELIZABETH A ROBINSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 08, 2025
Interview Requested
Jul 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 21, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 21, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 02, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584828
INTEGRATED CONSTANT-TEMPERATURE FULLY-AUTOMATIC CELL SMEAR PREPARATION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC CYTOLOGY SLIDE PREPARATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578351
AUTOMATIC ANALYZER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12553803
LYSIS DEVICES HAVING A PIEZO ELEMENT AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12546790
MICROSCOPE SLIDE PROCESSING SYSTEMS, CONSUMABLE STAINER MODULES, AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539513
A MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+25.7%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 137 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month