Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/216,094

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
FAN, SU JYA
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fuji Electric Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
700 granted / 929 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
982
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 929 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species (a1) fig. 7, (b1) figs. 5-6, claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 9 in the reply filed on 11/10/25 is acknowledged. Claims 3, 5 and 7 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11/10/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uchida, JP 2021027145 A (see attached English machine translation) in view of Teshima et al., US Publication No. 2011/0006718 A1 (from the IDS). Uchida teaches: 1. A semiconductor device comprising (see figs. 3-5 and 7-8): an isolation circuit board (160); a semiconductor chip (60, 70) provided on one main surface of the isolation circuit board; a first external terminal (150 or 140) having a main surface and including a first snubber connecting portion (153 or 143) rising from the main surface of the first external terminal, the first external terminal (150 or 140) being electrically connected to the semiconductor chip (60, 70); a second external terminal (130) placed adjacent to the first external terminal, having a main surface facing the same direction as the main surface of the first external terminal (150 or 140), and including a second snubber connecting portion (133) rising from the main surface of the second external terminal, the second external terminal (130) being electrically connected to the semiconductor chip (60, 70); a capacitor (211, 221 of 200 in fig. 8) having one end connected to the first snubber connecting portion (153 or 143) and the other end connected to the second snubber connecting portion (133); …and a case (110) inside which the semiconductor chip (60, 70) is stored and to which the first external terminal (150 or 140) and the second external terminal (130) are attached. See Uchida at Abstract and English machine translation pages 5-8. Regarding claim 1: Uchida does not expressly teach: a seal member sealing the semiconductor chip; In an analogous art, Teshima teaches: a seal member (12) sealing semiconductor chips (25-28), fig. 1, para. [0039]. Uchida further teaches: 2. The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first snubber connecting portion (e.g. interpreted as 143 in claim 1) and the second snubber connecting portion (133) extend in a direction perpendicular to the main surface of the first external terminal (e.g. interpreted as 140), and a distance by which the first snubber connecting portion (e.g. interpreted as 143) and the second snubber connecting portion (133) are distanced from each other is larger than a distance by which the first external terminal (140) and the second external terminal (130) are distanced from each other, fig. 5. 4. The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first snubber connecting portion (e.g. interpreted as 143 in claim 1) and the second snubber connecting portion (133) have the same height, fig. 5. Regarding claim 6: Teshima further teaches wherein the capacitor (22) is provided inside the seal member (12), fig. 1, para. [0039]. One of ordinary skill in the art modifying Uchida with Teshima would form wherein the capacitor (211, 221 of 200 in fig. 8) is provided inside the seal member because the capacitor is disposed inside (112) the case (110). See Uchida at Abstract, Uchida further teaches: 8. The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor chip (60, 70) includes a first main electrode and a second main electrode (e.g. In fig. 4, main electrodes coupled to 162 or 162 and also main electrodes coupled by wires 166, 167.), the isolation circuit board (160) includes an insulating plate having one main surface on which a first electrically-conductive plate electrically connected to the second main electrode and a second electrically-conductive plate electrically connected to the first main electrode are placed (e.g. For chip 60, the main electrodes are coupled to electrically-conductive plates 161, 163. For chip 70, he main electrodes are coupled to electrically-conductive plates 162, 163.), the first external terminal is electrically connected to the first electrically-conductive plate (e.g. The first external terminal 150, 140 is electrically connected to 163, 161, respectively.) and the second external terminal (130) is electrically connected to the second electrically-conductive plate (162), figs. 4-5. Regarding claim 9: One of ordinary skill in the art modifying Uchida with Teshima would form an insulating sheet such as the sealing resin placed between (e.g. See Uchida’s fig. 7) the first external terminal (150 or 140) and the second external terminal (130) because the sealing resin fills the space inside case (111). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Uchida with the teachings of Teshima because the resin mold layer 12 firmly fixes the substrate to the module case 11. See Teshima at para. [0039]. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uchida, as applied to claim 1 above, in view of Egusa, US Publication No. 2024/0162122 A1. Regarding claim 9: Uchida teaches all the limitations of claim 1 above, and in an alternative interpretation of claim 9 the reference Egusa is being introduced. In an analogous art, Egusa teaches: an insulating sheet (e.g. “insulating paper” placed between the first external terminal and the second external terminal (e.g. terminals 18a, 18b, 18c). See Egusa at para. [0086], fig. 7. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Uchida with the teachings of Egusa to prevent the terminals from short-circuiting. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michele Fan whose telephone number is 571-270-7401. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 7:30 am to 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jeff Natalini, can be reached on (571) 272-2266. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Michele Fan/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818 15 January 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593739
POWER MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593700
Low Parasitic Inductance Power Module Having Staggered, Interleaving Conductive Busbars
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588571
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588373
DISPLAY DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588374
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.2%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 929 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month