Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/221,304

APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jul 12, 2023
Priority
Oct 31, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0143024
Examiner
NGUYEN, DONGHAI D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
677 granted / 897 resolved
+5.5% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
911
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 897 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-3, 5, 7-8, 11-13, 15 and 17-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent 9,431,365 to Seok et al. This rejection can be found in the previous Office Action, dated 04/15/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 10 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seok et al. This rejection can be found in the previous Office Action, dated 04/15/26. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 6, 9, 14, 16 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on June 23, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued that “Seok fails to disclose at least the claimed "deep learning unit configured to update the operator through deep learning," and therefore does not anticipate independent claims 1 and 11” (3rd paragraph, page 9). The Examiner disagrees, because Seok et al disclose a system (i.e., unit) and a process that update the operation of mounting chips on to a circuit board by continuously updating/using the data regarding the positions of the chip and circuit board for correctly placing the chip onto the circuit board (see Col. 14, lines 17-29). Applicant has not claimed the exact structures/components of a deep learning unit but merely claimed a structure/unit configured to update the operator through itself. In response to applicant's argument that the references fail to show certain features of the invention, it is noted that the features upon which applicant relies (i.e.,” deep-learning-based architecture”) are not recited in the rejected claim(s). Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DONGHAI D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4566. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas J. Hong can be reached at 571-272-4690. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DN/ /DONGHAI D NGUYEN/September 5, 2026 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 23, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750950
LASER FOLDED 3D ELECTRONICS
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749600
Rotary Braid Flaring System
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739980
CONNECTION STRUCTURE FOR YARN WIRE AND CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722262
PARALLEL CRIMPING PLIER WITH INTERCHANGEABEL MOUTHPIECES
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727090
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.0%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 897 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month