Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/222,776

SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING PCB EDGE HEAT DISSIPATION

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Jul 17, 2023
Priority
Jan 27, 2023 — provisional 63/441,614
Examiner
ZARNEKE, DAVID A
Art Unit
2891
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SanDisk Technologies Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
576 granted / 813 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
856
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
63.5%
+23.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 813 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see the claim amendments filed 5/19/26, with respect to the rejection(s) over Kondo of the claim(s) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made below. First it is agreed that Kondo teaches a semiconductor chip and not a semiconductor package. Kondo is added to the rejection, as detailed below, to overcome this deficiency. The second argument is that Kondo’s bumps 15 are not solder balls and therefore fails to teach the claimed thermal conduction pathway. Every skilled artisan knows that bumps can be made of various materials such as metals or solder, and that solder is the predominant bump material. Third, it is argued that the identified TIM 32 of Kondo has the metal films 27 between it and the substrate therefore it is not adjacent the edge of the claimed thermal conduction structure. Note that adjacent does not necessarily or inherently mean in direct contact with, see definition 3 below. In Kondo, it is “very near”. Further, note that if amended to claim “in direct contact”, the TIM could be changed to include 27, making the TIM the combination of 27 and 32. PNG media_image1.png 427 542 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, another argument is that Kondo doesn’t teach one or more thermally conductive layers at an edge of the PCB and a TIM in contact with them. The combination of layers 22/27 to teach them do not result in one or more thermally conductive layers at an edge, Kondo merely teaches it reaches a side surface. Reaching a side surface is not the same as exposed at an edge. Note that the one or more thermally conductive layers 27 is clearly exposed at the edge of the substrate, as claimed. With respect to claim 14, it is further argued that Kondo does not teach a TIM in contact with the exposed thermally conductive layers. Note that Kondo clearly teaches a TIM 32 in direct contact with the one or more thermally conductive layers 27 at the edge of the substrate. Also argued in claim 14 is that Kondo fails to teach the claimed conductive pathway going from the solder balls, to the thermally conductive vias, to the thermally conducive layers, and to the TIM. Note that Kondo clearly and succinctly teaches the claimed conductive pathway going from the solder balls 15, to the thermally conductive vias 23, to the thermally conducive layers 22, and to the TIM 32. Applicant's arguments filed 5/19/26 with respect to the rejection over Hou in view of Kondo have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. It is argued that the combination of Hou fails to teach the thermal conduction path is vertical and not through the solder balls, the thermally conductive vias, the thermally conductive layers and the TIM to the edge. Note that in the rejection of Hou in view of Kondo, though does Hou teach a vertical thermal conduction path, Hou also teaches in paragraphs 0013 & 0034 a thermal conduction pathway that goes through the solder balls (15 of Kondo), the thermally conductive vias 101, the thermally conductive layers 102, and the TIM 104 to the edge. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The amendment to claim 12 overcomes the 112 rejection and it’s therefore withdrawn. Rejection over Kondo et al., US 2022/0059427 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-3, 6-11, 13-14, and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a2 as being clearly anticipated by Kondo et al., US 2022/0059427, in view of Gann et al., US 7,714,426. Regarding claim 1, Kondo (figure 3) teaches a semiconductor storage device, comprising: a heat conduction medium 12, comprising: one or more thermally conductive layers 22/27 extending to an edge of the heat conduction medium 12; one or more thermally conductive vias 23 configured to conduct heat to the one or more thermally conductive layers 22; a semiconductor package 14 mounted on a surface of the heat conduction medium 12 by a plurality of solder balls 15, wherein the one or more thermally conductive vias 23 are positioned adjacent to a group of one or more solder balls 15 of the plurality of solder balls 15 to conduct heat from the semiconductor package 14 through the one or more solder balls 15; and a thermal interface material (TIM) 32 mounted adjacent to the edge of the heat conduction medium 12, the one or more thermally conductive layers 22; wherein a thermal conduction path exists to conduct heat away from the semiconductor package through the edge of the heat conduction medium, the thermal conduction path comprising the one or more solder balls, the one or more thermally conductive vias, the one or more thermally conductive layers and the TIM. Kondo, which teaches semiconductor chips 14, fails to teach semiconductor packages. Gann (figures 3 & 10) teaches the equivalence of a packaged chip (figure 1:1) or an integrated circuit die (figure 10:100) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the packages of Gann in the invention of Kondo because Gann teaches the equivalence of using both. The substitution of one known equivalent technique for another may be obvious even if the prior art does not expressly suggest the substitution (Ex parte Novak 16 USPQ 2d 2041 (BPAI 1989); In re Mostovych 144 USPQ 38 (CCPA 1964); In re Leshin 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960); Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. V. Linde Air Products Co. 85 USPQ 328 (USSC 1950). With respect to claim 2, Kondo (figure 3) teaches an enclosure 30 including a sidewall, the TIM 32 configured to conduct heat to the sidewall of the enclosure 32. As to claim 3, Kondo (figure 3) teaches the TIM 32 is in direct contact with the one or more thermally conductive layers 22/27 at the edge of the heat conduction medium 12. As to claim 6, Kondo (figure 2) teaches the TIM 32 is one of a plurality of TIMs along the edge of the heat conduction medium 12. In re claim 7, Kondo (figure 3) teaches the one or more thermally conductive layers 22 comprise a first set of thermally conductive layers 22, the edge (left side of 12) comprises a first edge and the one or more thermally conductive vias 23 comprise a first set of thermally conductive vias 23 (on left side of 12), the heat conduction medium 12 further comprising: a second set of one or more thermally conductive layers 22 extending to a second edge (right side of 12) of the heat conduction medium 12, and a second set of one or more thermally conductive vias 23 (on right side of 12) configured to conduct heat to the second set of one or more thermally conductive layers 22. Concerning claim 8, Kondo (figure 2 teaches TIM 32 on all four edges) teaches the TIM 32 comprises a first TIM 32, the semiconductor storage device further comprising a second thermal interface material (TIM) 32 mounted adjacent to the second edge of the heat conduction medium 12, the second set of one or more thermally conductive layers 22 configured to conduct heat to the second TIM 32. Pertaining to claim 9, wherein the group of one or more solder balls 15 of the semiconductor package 14 (the left 14) comprise a first group of one or more solder balls 15 (on the left), and wherein the second set of one or more thermally conductive vias 23 are configured to receive heat from a second group (on the right) of one or more solder balls 15 of the plurality of solder balls 15. In claim 10, Kondo (figure 3) teaches a second semiconductor package (right 14) mounted on the surface of the heat conduction medium 12, the second semiconductor package (right 14) comprising a second plurality of solder balls 15 (on the right). Regarding claim 11, Kondo (figure 3) teaches the first (left 14) semiconductor package is positioned adjacent to the first edge (left side of 12) and the second semiconductor package (right 14) is positioned adjacent to the second edge (right side of 12), and wherein the second group of one or more thermally conductive vias (right 23) are positioned adjacent to a second group of one or more solder balls (right 15) of the second plurality of solder balls (right 15) to conduct heat from the second semiconductor package (right 14) through the second group of one or more solder balls (right 15) to the second set of one or more thermally vias (right 23). With respect to claim 12, Kondo (figure 3) teaches the first (left 14) and second (right 14) semiconductor packages are positioned adjacent to the first edge, and wherein the first group of one or more thermally conductive vias 23 are positioned adjacent to a second group of one or more solder balls 15 of the second plurality of solder balls 15 to conduct heat from the second semiconductor package (right 14) through the second group of one or more solder balls 15 to the first group of one or more thermally conductive vias 23. Kondo, which teaches semiconductor chips 14, fails to teach semiconductor packages. Gann (figures 3 & 10) teaches the equivalence of a packaged chip (figure 1:1) or an integrated circuit die (figure 10:100) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the packages of Gann in the invention of Kondo because Gann teaches the equivalence of using both. The substitution of one known equivalent technique for another may be obvious even if the prior art does not expressly suggest the substitution (Ex parte Novak 16 USPQ 2d 2041 (BPAI 1989); In re Mostovych 144 USPQ 38 (CCPA 1964); In re Leshin 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960); Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. V. Linde Air Products Co. 85 USPQ 328 (USSC 1950). As to claim 13, Kondo (figure 3) teaches the heat conduction medium 12 comprises a printed circuit board 60 comprising the one or more thermally conductive layers 61 interspersed with one or more dielectric layers (between each layer 61). In re claim 14, Kondo (figure 3) teaches a semiconductor storage device, comprising: a printed circuit board (PCB) 12, comprising: one or more thermally conductive layers 22/27 exposed at an edge of the PCB 12; one or more thermally conductive vias 23 configured to conduct heat to the one or more thermally conductive layers 22/27; a semiconductor package 14 mounted on a surface of the PCB 12 by a plurality of solder balls 15, wherein the one or more thermally conductive vias 23 are positioned adjacent to a group of one or more solder balls 15 of the plurality of solder balls 15; and a thermal interface material (TIM) 32 mounted at the edge of the PCB 12 in contact with the one or more thermally conductive layers 22/27; wherein a thermal conduction path exists to conduct heat away from the semiconductor package 14 through the edge of the PCB 12, the thermal conduction path comprising the one or more solder balls 15, the one or more thermally conductive vias 23, the one or more thermally conductive layers 22/27 and the TIM 32. Concerning claim 18, Kondo (figure 3) teaches an enclosure 30 including a sidewall 30S, the TIM 32 configured to conduct heat to the sidewall 30S of the enclosure 30. Pertaining to claim 19, Kondo (figure 3) teaches the TIM 32 is in direct contact with the one or more thermally conductive layers 22/27 at the edge of the heat conduction medium 12. In claim 20, Kondo (figure 3) teaches a semiconductor storage device, comprising: a printed circuit board (PCB) 12, the PCB 12 having a surface and an edge adjacent to the surface; a semiconductor package 14 mounted on the surface of the PCB 12 by a plurality of solder balls 15; an enclosure 30 enclosing the PCB 12 and semiconductor package 14; first means 22/23/27 for conducting heat from the semiconductor package 14, through the plurality of solder balls 15, to the edge of the PCB 12; and second means 32 for conducting heat away from the edge of the PCB 12 to the enclosure 30. Rejections over Hou et al., CN 103560117 Claim(s) 1-3, 6-14, and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being clearly anticipated by Hou et al., CN 103560117, in view of Kondo et al., US 2022/0059427. Regarding claim 1. Hou (figures 2-3) teaches a semiconductor storage device, comprising: a heat conduction medium 100, comprising: one or more thermally conductive layers 102 extending to an edge of the heat conduction medium 100; one or more thermally conductive vias 101 configured to conduct heat to the one or more thermally conductive layers 102; a semiconductor package 201 mounted on a surface of the heat conduction medium 100, wherein the one or more thermally conductive vias 101 to conduct heat from the semiconductor package 201; and a thermal interface material (TIM) 104 mounted adjacent to the edge of the heat conduction medium 100, the one or more thermally conductive layers 102 configured to conduct heat to the TIM 104. Hou, which appears to teach using welding (paragraph 0026), fails to teach the semiconductor package 201 is mounted by a plurality of solder balls connected to the thermally conductive vias 101. Kondo (figure 1) teaches semiconductor package 14 is mounted by a plurality of solder balls 15 connected to the thermally conductive vias 23. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the solder balls 15 of Kondo in the invention of Hou because solder balls are a conventionally known and used equivalent bonding technique. The substitution of one known equivalent technique for another may be obvious even if the prior art does not expressly suggest the substitution (Ex parte Novak 16 USPQ 2d 2041 (BPAI 1989); In re Mostovych 144 USPQ 38 (CCPA 1964); In re Leshin 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960); Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. V. Linde Air Products Co. 85 USPQ 328 (USSC 1950). With respect to claim 2, Hou (figures 2-3) teaches an enclosure 700 including a sidewall, the TIM 104 configured to conduct heat to the sidewall of the enclosure 700. As to claim 3, Hou (figures 2-3) teaches the TIM 104 is in direct contact with the one or more thermally conductive layers 102 at the edge of the heat conduction medium 100. In re claim 6, Hou (figure 4) teaches the TIM 104 is one of a plurality of TIMs 104 along the edge of the heat conduction medium 100. Concerning claim 7, Hou (figures 2-3) teaches the one or more thermally conductive layers 102 comprise a first set of thermally conductive layers 102, the edge comprises a first edge and the one or more thermally conductive vias 101 comprise a first set of thermally conductive vias 101, the heat conduction medium 100 further comprising: a second set of one or more thermally conductive layers 102 extending to a second edge of the heat conduction medium 100, and a second set of one or more thermally conductive vias 101 configured to conduct heat to the second set of one or more thermally conductive layers 102. Pertaining to claim 8, Hou (figure 4) teaches the TIM comprises a first TIM , the semiconductor storage device further comprising a second thermal interface material (TIM) 104 mounted adjacent to the second edge of the heat conduction medium 100, the second set of one or more thermally conductive layers 102 configured to conduct heat to the second TIM 104. In claim 9, Kondo (figure 1) teaches the group of one or more solder balls 15 of the semiconductor package 14 comprise a first group of one or more solder balls 15, and wherein the second set of one or more thermally conductive vias 23 are configured to receive heat from a second group of one or more solder balls 15 of the plurality of solder balls 15. Regarding claim 10, Hou (figures 2-3) and Kondo combine to teach a second semiconductor package 201 mounted on the surface of the heat conduction medium 100, the second semiconductor package 201 comprising a second plurality of solder balls (taught by Kondo using solder balls 15). With respect to claim 11, Hou (figures 2-3) and Kondo combine to teach the first semiconductor package (left 201) is positioned adjacent to the first edge (left side of 100) and the second semiconductor package (right 201) is positioned adjacent to the second edge (right side of 100), and wherein the second group of one or more thermally conductive vias 101 are positioned adjacent to a second group of one or more solder balls (15 of Kondo) of the second plurality of solder balls (15 of Kondo) to conduct heat from the second semiconductor package (right 201) through the second group of one or more solder balls (15 of Kondo) to the second set of one or more thermally vias 101. As to claim 12, Hou (figures 2-3) and Kondo (figure1) combine to teach the first 201 and second 201 semiconductor packages are positioned adjacent to the first edge, and wherein the first group of one or more thermally conductive vias 23 are positioned adjacent to a second group of one or more solder balls (15 of Kondo) of the second plurality of solder balls (15 of Kondo)to conduct heat from the second semiconductor package 201 through the second group of one or more solder balls (15 of Kondo) to the first group of one or more thermally conductive vias 101, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use multiple packages 14 on the first edge in the invention of Kondo because the mere duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced (In re Harza, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960)). In re claim 13, Hou (figures 2-3) teaches the heat conduction medium 100 comprises a printed circuit board comprising the one or more thermally conductive layers 102 interspersed with one or more dielectric layers 103. Concerning claim 14, Hou (figures 2-3) teaches a semiconductor storage device, comprising: a printed circuit board (PCB) 100, comprising: one or more thermally conductive layers 102 exposed at an edge of the PCB 100; one or more thermally conductive vias 101 configured to conduct heat to the one or more thermally conductive layers 102; a semiconductor package 201 mounted on a surface of the PCB 100; and a thermal interface material (TIM) 104 mounted at the edge of the PCB 100 in contact with the one or more thermally conductive layers 102; wherein a thermal conduction path exists to conduct heat away from the semiconductor package 201 through the edge of the PCB 100, the thermal conduction path comprising the one or more thermally conductive vias 101, the one or more thermally conductive layers 102 and the TIM 104. Hou fails teach solder balls connect the thermally conductive vias to the packages, wherein the one or more thermally conductive vias 101 are positioned adjacent to a group of one or more solder balls of the plurality of solder balls. Kondo (figure 1) teaches solder balls 15 connect the thermally conductive vias 23 to the packages 14, wherein the one or more thermally conductive vias 23 are positioned adjacent to a group of one or more solder balls 15 of the plurality of solder balls 15. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the solder balls 15 of Kondo in the invention of Hou because solder balls are a conventionally known and used equivalent bonding technique. The substitution of one known equivalent technique for another may be obvious even if the prior art does not expressly suggest the substitution (Ex parte Novak 16 USPQ 2d 2041 (BPAI 1989); In re Mostovych 144 USPQ 38 (CCPA 1964); In re Leshin 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960); Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. V. Linde Air Products Co. 85 USPQ 328 (USSC 1950). Pertaining to claim 18, Hou (figures 2-3) teaches an enclosure 700 including a sidewall, the TIM 104 configured to conduct heat to the sidewall of the enclosure 700. In claim 19, Hou (figures 2-3) teaches the TIM 104 is in direct contact with the one or more thermally conductive layers 102 at the edge of the heat conduction medium 100. Regarding claim 20, Hou (figures 2-3) teaches a semiconductor storage device, comprising: a printed circuit board (PCB) 100, the PCB 100 having a surface and an edge adjacent to the surface; a semiconductor package 201 mounted on the surface of the PCB 100; an enclosure 700 enclosing the PCB 100 and semiconductor package 201; first means 101/102 for conducting heat from the semiconductor package 201 to the edge of the PCB 100; and second means 104 for conducting heat away from the edge of the PCB 100 to the enclosure 700. Hou fails teach solder balls connect the package to the PCB. Kondo (figure 1) teaches solder balls 15 connect the package 14 to the PCB 12. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the solder balls 15 of Kondo in the invention of Hou because solder balls are a conventionally known and used equivalent bonding technique. The substitution of one known equivalent technique for another may be obvious even if the prior art does not expressly suggest the substitution (Ex parte Novak 16 USPQ 2d 2041 (BPAI 1989); In re Mostovych 144 USPQ 38 (CCPA 1964); In re Leshin 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960); Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. V. Linde Air Products Co. 85 USPQ 328 (USSC 1950). Conclusion The cited prior art teach similar inventions to the invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID A ZARNEKE whose telephone number is (571)272-1937. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matt Landau can be reached at 571-272-1731. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID A ZARNEKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2891 6/29/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
May 19, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707649
STACKED 3D CACHE CONFIGURATION WITH ON-CHIP POWER SUPPORT
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707989
POWER SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702038
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FLUXLESS THERMOCOMPRESSION BONDING
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690446
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING THROUGH VIA AND METHOD OF MAKING
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12685159
3D INTEGRATED CHIPS WITH MICROFLUIDIC COOLING
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 813 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month