Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/222,876

MEMORY AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF AND MEMORY SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 17, 2023
Examiner
SANDVIK, BENJAMIN P
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
874 granted / 1142 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1167
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1142 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 13-20 in the reply filed on 12/9/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-12 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 13-16, 18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ryu et al (U.S. Pub #2022/0223732). With respect to claim 13, Ryu teaches a memory device, comprising: a plurality of semiconductor bodies (Fig. 7, vertical portions130 and Paragraph 39) spaced apart from each other and extending along a first direction; spacing portions (Fig. 7, portions including 140A/150A/114) between adjacent semiconductor bodies; conductive connection portions (Fig. 7, 160A and Paragraph 59) connected to the semiconductor bodies along the first direction; and spacer portions (Fig. 7, portions of 116) disposed on sides of the spacing portions along the first direction (Fig. 7, Z direction) and disposed around the conductive connection portions, wherein the conductive connection portions and the spacing portions overlap along a second direction (Fig. 7, X direction) that is perpendicular to the first direction. With respect to claim 14, Ryu teaches that the semiconductor bodies comprise drains, channels, and sources that are arranged along the first direction (Paragraph 38), and the sources are located on sides of the channels close to the conductive connection portions that are connected to the sources along the first direction (Paragraph 30, the bit line 120 is below the transistor, hence the drain S/D region is the lower region and the source S/D region is the upper region). With respect to claim 15, Ryu teaches part of the spacing portions comprise gates (Fig. 7, 150a/150b and Paragraph 28) close to sides of the channels and gate insulation sub-portions (Fig. 7, 140a/140b and Paragraph 28) between the gates and the channels. With respect to claim 16, Ryu teaches that ends of the conductive connection portions (Fig. 7 bottom surface portion of 160A/160B) close to the semiconductor bodies (Fig. 7, 130) and the spacing portions (Fig. 7, 114) overlap along the second direction, and ends of the conductive connection portions far away from the semiconductor bodies and the spacer portions (Fig. 7, 116) overlap along the second direction. With respect to claim 18, Ryu teaches that widths of the conductive connection portions (Fig. 7, 160A) along the second direction are greater than widths of the semiconductor bodies (Fig. 7, 132 and/or 134) along the second direction (Fig. 7, X direction). With respect to claim 20, Ryu teaches a memory system, comprising: a memory device (Fig. 7 and Paragraph 75); and a controller coupled to the memory device and configured to control the memory device to store data (Paragraph 71-72), wherein the memory device comprises: a plurality of semiconductor bodies (Fig. 7, vertical portions130 and Paragraph 39) spaced apart from each other and extending along a first direction; spacing portions (Fig. 7, portions including 140A/150A/114) between adjacent semiconductor bodies; conductive connection portions (Fig. 7, 160A and Paragraph 59) connected to the semiconductor bodies along the first direction; and spacer portions (Fig. 7, portions of 116) disposed on sides of the spacing portions along the first direction (Fig. 7, Z direction) and disposed around the conductive connection portions, wherein the conductive connection portions and the spacing portions overlap along a second direction (Fig. 7, X direction) that is perpendicular to the first direction. Claims 13, 14, 17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lee et al (U.S. Pub #2023/0055499). With respect to claim 13, Lee teaches a memory device, comprising: a plurality of semiconductor bodies (Fig. 5A-5C, vertical portions VCP1 and VCP2 and Paragraph 52) spaced apart from each other and extending along a first direction (Fig. 5A-5C, vertical direction); spacing portions (Fig. 5A-5C, portions including Gox, WL, SP, and 153) between adjacent semiconductor bodies; conductive connection portions (Fig. 5A-5C, LP and Paragraph 78) connected to the semiconductor bodies along the first direction; and spacer portions (Fig. 5A-5C, portions of 165) disposed on sides of the spacing portions along the first direction (Fig. 7, vertical direction) and disposed around the conductive connection portions, wherein the conductive connection portions and the spacing portions overlap along a second direction (Fig. 7, horizontal direction) that is perpendicular to the first direction. With respect to claim 14, Lee teaches that the semiconductor bodies comprise drains, channels, and sources that are arranged along the first direction (Paragraph 56), and the sources are located on sides of the channels close to the conductive connection portions that are connected to the sources along the first direction (Paragraph 24, the source regions are the upper S/D regions). With respect to claim 17, Lee teaches that widths of ends of the conductive connection portions (Fig. 5A-5C, LP) far away from the semiconductor bodies (Figs. 5A-5C, VCP) along the second direction are greater than widths of ends of the conductive connection portions close to the semiconductor bodies along the second direction. With respect to claim 19, Lee teaches a barrier layer (Fig. 5A-5C, 155) disposed between the spacer portions (Fig. 5A-5C, 165) and the spacing portions (Fig. 5A-5C, 153). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN P SANDVIK whose telephone number is (571)272-8446. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at (571)-272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN P SANDVIK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 16, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604579
LIGHT EMITTING PACKAGE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595169
HERMETICALLY SEALED GLASS PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598984
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING CONDUCTIVE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588507
IMPINGEMENT COOLING IN HIGH POWER PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575249
OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+6.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1142 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month