Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/223,416

Monitoring and Operational Functionalities for an Enterprise Using Process Control or Automation System

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Jul 18, 2023
Examiner
KASENGE, CHARLES R
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Fisher-Rosemount Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
1089 granted / 1290 resolved
+29.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1328
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§103
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§102
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1290 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the “first plurality of instantiated MEEEs” could be interpreted as software, which is non-statutory subject matter. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-58 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Val U.S. PGPub 2019/0369574 (hereinafter “Val”). Regarding claims 1 and 30, Val discloses a process control or automation system comprising: a first plurality of instantiated micro-encapsulated execution environments (MEEEs) (e.g. virtual machines) communicatively connected to a plurality of physical devices (e.g. field devices) located across a plurality of physical locations or sites, the plurality of physical devices performing respective physical functions to implement a plurality of industrial or automation processes (e.g. actions) of an enterprise at respective ones of the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 2 and 31, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 1, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs communicate (via VPN) with the plurality of physical devices via a first one or more secured point-to-point (PTP) or peer-to-peer (P2P) connections (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 3 and 32, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 2, wherein each the first one or more secured PTP or P2P connections comprise a first one or more virtual private networks (VPNs) (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 4 and 33, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 2, wherein the first one or more secured PTP or P2P connections are a first plurality of secured PTP or P2P connections, wherein each respective one of the first plurality of secured PTP or P2P connections is exclusive to a respective one of the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs and a respective one of the plurality of physical devices (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 5 and 34, Val discloses the process control or management functionality of claim 1, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs execute at one or more of the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 6 and 35, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 1, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs execute to provide unidirectional or bidirectional communications between an enterprise computing device and the plurality of physical devices across the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 7 and 36, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the enterprise computing device is located at a further physical location or site remote from the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶29-32). Regarding claims 8 and 37, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the enterprise computing device communicates with the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs via a second one or more secured point-to-point (PTP) or peer-to-peer (P2P) connections (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 9 and 38, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 8, wherein each the second one or more secured PTP or P2P connections comprise a second one or more virtual private networks (VPNs) (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 10 and 39, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 8, wherein the second one or more secured PTP or P2P connections are a second plurality of secured PTP or P2P connections, wherein each respective one of the second plurality of secured PTP or P2P connections is exclusive to the enterprise computing device and a respective one of the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 11 and 40, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, information associated with operation of the plurality of physical locations or sites, the information including one or more of process configuration information, process setpoints, real-time process measurements, historical process data, process quality metrics, physical device statuses, process alarms, network traffic information, site safety information, or site security information (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 12 and 41, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs enables the enterprise computing device to define one or more hardware or software configuration parameters for each of the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 13 and 42, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a process configuration (e.g. setting) functionality to define respective control routines for the plurality of industrial or automation processes (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 14 and 43, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 13, wherein the process configuration functionality enables a user of the enterprise computing device to use a library of template objects to configure control routines across the plurality of industrial or automation processes at the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 15 and 44, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a hierarchical representation of the plurality of physical locations or sites, the plurality of industrial or automation processes, or the plurality of physical devices (e.g. Fig. 1). Regarding claims 16 and 45, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a simulation or testing functionality to simulate or test (via diagnostic service and analysis) operation of at least a first one of the plurality of industrial or automation processes (e.g. ¶14-15, 26 and 29-31). Regarding claims 17 and 46, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 16, wherein the simulation or testing functionality simulates or tests operation of the first one of the plurality of industrial or automation processes according to a control routine or control parameter of a second one of the plurality of industrial or automation processes (e.g. ¶14-15, 26 and 29-31). Regarding claims 18 and 47, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a personnel management functionality to view or configure personnel shift assignments, access permissions, task assignments, or instructions for personnel (e.g. operators/customers) across the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 19 and 48, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a display creation functionality to configure one or more process displays (e.g. ¶16 and 22) for viewing information associated with operation of at least one of the plurality of industrial or automation processes (e.g. ¶14-15, 26 and 29-31). Regarding claims 20 and 49, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a diagnostics or analytics functionality to perform diagnostics or analytics upon first data generated during operation of at least a first one of the plurality of industrial or automation processes (e.g. ¶14-15, 26 and 29-31). Regarding claims 21 and 50, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 20, wherein the diagnostics or analytics functionality performs diagnostics or analytics upon the first data based upon comparison to data generated during operation of a second one or more of the plurality of industrial or automation processes across the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶14-15, 26 and 29-31). Regarding claims 22 and 51, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 20, wherein the diagnostics or analytics functionality recommends an application or service recommendation (e.g. action) for one or more of the plurality of industrial or automation processes based upon the performed diagnostics or analytics (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 23 and 52, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, an application or service marketplace functionality to obtain one or more applications or services and push the obtained one or more applications or services to one or more of the plurality of industrial or automation processes (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 24 and 53, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a data governance functionality to allow a user (e.g. customer/operator) of the enterprise computing device to define data management policies for one or more of plurality of industrial or automation processes or one or more of the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶13 and 27). Regarding claims 25 and 54, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a process commissioning functionality to commission or decommission at least one of the plurality of industrial or automation processes (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 26 and 55, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, further comprising a second one or more instantiated MEEEs, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provides, to the enterprise computing device, a service allocation functionality to move or copy execution of the second one or more instantiated MEEEs across the plurality of physical locations or sites (e.g. ¶2-4, 13-15 and 28-32; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 27 and 56, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 6, wherein access of the enterprise computing device to at least a portion of the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs is enabled via a role-based authorization of the enterprise computing device or a first user (e.g. 1st operator) thereof (e.g. ¶13 and 27). Regarding claims 28 and 57, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 27, wherein the first plurality of instantiated MEEEs provide a role-based authorization management functionality to transfer access to the at least the portion of the plurality of instantiated MEEEs from the enterprise computing device or first user to a second enterprise computing device or a second user (e.g. 2nd operator) thereof (e.g. ¶13 and 27). Regarding claims 29 and 58, Val discloses the process control or automation system of claim 28, wherein the enterprise computing device or first user is located remotely from the second enterprise computing device or second user, and wherein the role-based authorization management functionality is configured to transfer role-based authorization from the enterprise computing device or first user to the second enterprise computing device or second user at a predetermined time based upon locations of the first enterprise computing device and the second computing device (e.g. ¶13 and 27). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES R KASENGE whose telephone number is (571)272-3743. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Lo can be reached at (571) 272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CK February 21, 2026 /CHARLES R KASENGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600264
THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF VEHICLE ENERGY STORAGE MEANS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596340
ELECTRONIC DEVICE CONTROLLING EXTERNAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590283
Hybrid Predictive Modeling for Control of Cell Culture
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586055
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATIONS PAYMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579453
Safety Interlock Failure Prediction Method and Roll Production System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1290 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month