Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/224,145

GRIPPER ASSEMBLY FOR PIPELINE ISOLATION TOOL AND METHODS OF USE

Non-Final OA §102§DP
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Examiner
DEAL, DAVID R
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tdw Delaware, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
457 granted / 549 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
565
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 549 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 3-5, 7-8 and 11-14 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-12 of U.S. Patent No. 11,708,929. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the patent anticipate the claims of the application as set forth below: 18/224,145 USPN 11,708,929 Remarks 1. A gripper assembly for a pipeline plug comprising: an actuator plate, the actuator plate including a wedge surface; a bowl, the bowl including a bowl expansion face, the bowl expansion face having bowl stairsteps; and a gripper unit, the gripper unit including a gripper body, the gripper body positioned between the actuator plate and the bowl, the gripper body including an expansion face, the expansion face having gripper stairsteps, the gripper stairsteps corresponding to the bowl stairsteps. 1. A gripper assembly for a pipeline plug comprising: an actuator plate, the actuator plate including a wedge surface; a bowl, the bowl including a bowl expansion face, the bowl expansion face having bowl stairsteps; a gripper unit, the gripper unit including a gripper body, the gripper body positioned between the actuator plate and the bowl, the gripper body including an expansion face, the expansion face having gripper stairsteps, the gripper stairsteps corresponding to the bowl stairsteps; and an actuator expansion spring positioned between the actuator plate and the gripper body. The application claim is anticipated by the patent claim Claims 3-5, 7-8 and 11-14 of the application are the same as claims 2-4, 5-6 and 7-12 of the patent. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-5, 7-8 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by United States Patent No. 7314065 B1 to Adelman (Adelman). With regard to claim 1, Adelman discloses a gripper assembly for a pipeline plug (Adelman, title, abstract) comprising: an actuator plate (12, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5), the actuator plate including a wedge surface (15 and including grooves 44, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5); a bowl (14, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5), the bowl including a bowl expansion face (27, fig. 1, column 2, lines 7-11), the bowl expansion face having bowl stairsteps (26/56, fig. 6); and a gripper unit (46/46, fig. 6, column 2, lines 22-23), the gripper unit including a gripper body (the body of the rings described at column 2, lines 22-23), the gripper body positioned between the actuator plate and the bowl (as shown in figs. 4 and 6), the gripper body including an expansion face (48, fig. 6, column 2, lines 23-26), the expansion face having gripper stairsteps (shown in fig. 6), the gripper stairsteps corresponding to the bowl stairsteps (shown in fig. 6, the expansion face 48 interfaces with bowl stairstep face 56. This interface is considered to “correspond” the gripper stairsteps and the bowl stairsteps). With regard to claim 3, Adelman discloses the gripper assembly of claim 1 as set forth above, and further discloses wherein the gripper unit further comprises a sliding wedge (the compression rings 46 that are received in annular groves 44 noted in fig. 4 and shown without the reference number in fig. 6 are capable of rotating in circumferential direction, making the angled face 48 a sliding wedge), the sliding wedge abutting a radially outer surface of the gripper body (the sliding wedge of the compression ring 46 abuts an outer surface of the bowl 14 as shown in fig. 6). With regard to claim 4, Adelman discloses the gripper assembly of claim 3 as set forth above, and further discloses wherein the sliding wedge abuts the wedge surface of the actuator plate (as described above, the sliding wedge is slidable in the groove 44 which is part of the wedge surface of the actuator plate 12). With regard to claim 5, Adelman discloses the gripper assembly of claim 3 as set forth above, and further discloses wherein the sliding wedge is slidingly coupled to the actuator by a fastener (the shape and dimensions of the groove 44 in combination with the resiliency of the compression ring 46 is a type of fastening arrangement that is functionally equivalent to a friction fit fastener). With regard to claim 7, Adelman discloses the gripper assembly for a pipeline plug (Adelman, title, abstract) comprising: an actuator plate (12, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5), the actuator plate including a wedge surface (15 and including grooves 44, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5); a bowl (14, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5), the bowl including a bowl expansion face (27, fig. 1, column 2, lines 7-11); and a gripper unit (46/46, fig. 6, column 2, lines 22-23), the gripper unit including a gripper body (the body of the rings described at column 2, lines 22-23) and a sliding wedge (the compression rings 46 that are received in annular groves 44 noted in fig. 4 and shown without the reference number in fig. 6 are capable of rotating in circumferential direction, making the angled face 48 of each ring 46 a sliding wedge), the sliding wedge abutting a radially outer surface of the gripper body the gripper unit (the sliding wedge of the compression ring 46 abuts an outer surface of the bowl 14 as shown in fig. 6) positioned between the actuator plate and the bowl (as shown in figs. 4 and 6), the gripper body including an expansion face (48, fig. 6, column 2, lines 23-26) abutting the bowl expansion face (shown in fig. 6), the radially outer surface of the gripper body formed at an angle (as shown in fig. 6, the face is angled) or curved. With regard to claim 8, Adelman discloses the gripper assembly of claim 7 as set forth above, and further discloses wherein the bowl expansion face further comprises bowl stairsteps (26/56, fig. 6), wherein the expansion face of the gripper unit further comprises gripper stairsteps corresponding to the bowl stairsteps (as shown in fig. 6). With regard to claim 11, Adelman discloses the gripper assembly of claim 7 as set forth above, and further discloses wherein the sliding wedge abuts the wedge surface of the actuator plate (as described above, the sliding wedge is slidable in the groove 44 which is part of the wedge surface of the actuator plate 12). With regard to claim 12, Adelman discloses the gripper assembly of claim 7 as set forth above, and further discloses wherein the sliding wedge is slidingly coupled to the actuator by a fastener (the shape and dimensions of the groove 44 in combination with the resiliency of the compression ring 46 is a type of fastening arrangement that is functionally equivalent to a friction fit fastener). With regard to claim 13, Adelman discloses a method comprising: positioning a pipeline plug (10, fig. 1) in a pipeline (18, fig. 4), the pipeline plug including a gripper assembly, the gripper assembly including: an actuator plate (12, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5), the actuator plate including a wedge surface (15 and including grooves 44, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5); a bowl (14, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5), the bowl including a bowl expansion face (27, fig. 1, column 2, lines 7-11), the bowl expansion face having bowl stairsteps (26/56, fig. 6); and a gripper unit (46/46, fig. 6, column 2, lines 22-23), the gripper unit including a gripper body (the body of the rings described at column 2, lines 22-23), the gripper body positioned between the actuator plate and the bowl (shown in fig. 4), the gripper body including an expansion face (48, fig. 6, column 2, lines 23-26), the expansion face having gripper stairsteps (shown in fig. 6), the gripper stairsteps corresponding to the bowl stairsteps (as shown in fig. 6); longitudinally moving the actuator plate toward the bowl (column 2, lines 7-11); moving the gripper unit radially outward (column 2, lines 7-11); and engaging the gripper stairsteps to the bowl stairsteps (shown in fig. 6). With regard to claim 14, Adelman discloses a method comprising: positioning a pipeline plug (10, fig. 1) in a pipeline (18, fig. 4), the pipeline plug including a gripper assembly, the gripper assembly including: an actuator plate (12, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5), the actuator plate including a wedge surface (15 and including grooves 44, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5); a bowl (14, fig. 1, column 2, lines 3-5), the bowl including a bowl expansion face (27, fig. 1, column 2, lines 7-11), the bowl expansion face having bowl stairsteps formed therein (26/56, fig. 6); and a gripper unit (46/46, fig. 6, column 2, lines 22-23), the gripper unit including a gripper body (the body of the rings described at column 2, lines 22-23) and a sliding wedge (the compression rings 46 that are received in annular groves 44 noted in fig. 4 and shown without the reference number in fig. 6 are capable of rotating in circumferential direction, making the angled face 48 of each ring 46 a sliding wedge), the sliding wedge abutting a radially outer surface of the gripper body the gripper unit positioned between the actuator plate and the bowl (the sliding wedge of the compression ring 46 abuts an outer surface of the bowl 14 as shown in fig. 6), the gripper body including an expansion face (48, fig. 6, column 2, lines 23-26) abutting the bowl expansion face (shown in fig. 6), the radially outer surface of the gripper body formed at an angle (as shown in fig. 6, the face is angled) or curved.; longitudinally moving the actuator plate toward the bowl (column 2, lines 7-11); moving the gripper unit radially outward (column 2, lines 7-11); engaging the sliding wedge to the pipeline (column 2, lines 7-11); moving the pipeline plug relative to the pipeline (column 2, lines 5-6); and sliding the sliding wedge relative to the gripper body (the shape and dimensions of the groove 44 in combination with the resiliency of the compression ring 46 is a type of fastening arrangement that is functionally equivalent to a friction fit fastener). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID R DEAL whose telephone number is (469)295-9216. The examiner can normally be reached M-F generally 8-4 pm CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisors can be reached at: Craig M Schneider (571) 272-3607 and Ken Rinehart (571) 272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID R DEAL/Primary Examiner Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 20, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP
Apr 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595872
TUBULAR END PROTECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595871
PIPE RENOVATION FILTRATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590657
PRE-ASSEMBLED COUPLING ASSEMBLY WITH CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590654
NESTLED HOSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578039
TUBE ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF FORMING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 549 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month