Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/224,689

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND FORMATION METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 21, 2023
Priority
Jul 22, 2022 — CN 202210868035.1
Examiner
VALENZUELA, PATRICIA D
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
647 granted / 717 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
77 currently pending
Career history
797
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
66.4%
+26.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 717 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithsTaN[0044 of Lim]ding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10, 21-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chinthakindi (USPGPUB DOCUMENT: 20070176295, hereinafter Chinthakindi) in view of Lim (USPGPUB DOCUMENT: 2012/0049997, hereinafter Lim) and Yagi (USPGPUB DOCUMENT: 2015/0162396, hereinafter Yagi). Re claim 1 Chinthakindi discloses in Fig 3 a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate[0004]; a metal layer(112) formed on the substrate[0004]; a dielectric layer(122) formed on the substrate[0004] and covering the metal layer(112); a first contact hole(hole of 104/102) formed in the dielectric layer(122), a bottom of the first contact hole(hole of 104/102) exposing a surface of the metal layer(112); a conductive layer(104/102) filled in the first contact hole(hole of 104/102); a thin film resistor layer(106) formed on a portion of the dielectric layer(122), and a cover layer(128) located on the thin film resistor layer(106). Chinthakindi does not discloses a bottom of the thin film resistor layer(106) contacting a top surface of the conductive layer(104/102); a thin film resistor layer formed on the conductive layer, Lim discloses in Fig 19 a bottom of the thin film resistor layer(202) contacting a top surface of the conductive layer(208); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Lim to the teachings of Chinthakindi in order to achieve tight tolerances with respect to resisTaN[0044 of Lim]ce and size to better attain precise, stable resisTaN[0044 of Lim]ces [0004, Lin]. Chinthakindi does not discloses a thin film resistor layer formed on the conductive layer, Yagi discloses a thin film resistor layer(23/20) formed on the conductive layer(30/33), It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Yagi to the teachings of Chinthakindi in order to further shortening manufacturing time and reducing costs for manufacturing masks [0007, Yagi]. Re claim 2 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, further comprising: a second contact hole formed in the dielectric layer(122) and the cover layer(128) and penetrating the dielectric layer(122) and the cover layer(128), a bottom of the second contact hole exposing the surface of the metal layer(112). Re claim 3 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 2, further comprising: a second conductive layer(104/102) filled in the second contact hole. Re claim 4 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 3, further comprising: a second metal layer(112) formed on the cover layer(128), a bottom surface of the second metal layer(112) contacting a top of the second conductive layer(104/102). Re claim 5 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the substrate[0004] includes: a base substrate[0004]; a storage device; and a logic device formed on the base substrate[0004]. Re claim 6 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 5, wherein the dielectric layer(122) is formed on the storage device and the logic device. Re claim 7 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein a material of the metal layer(112) is aluminum, copper, and nickel[0067 of Lim]. Re claim 8 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, further comprising: a protective layer(128 of Lim) formed on the metal layer(112). Re claim 9 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein a material of the dielectric layer(122) includes silicon oxide, silicon nitride[0017 of Lim], silicon nitride boride, silicon oxycarbide, or silicon oxynitride. Re claim 10 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein a material of the thin film resistor layer(106) includes CrSi, SiCCr, TaN[0044 of Lim], or NiCr. Re claim 21 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, further comprising: an anti-reflective layer on the thin film resistor layer(126 of Lim). Re claim 22 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 21, wherein: a material of the anti-reflective layer is SiON(126 of Lim). Re claim 23 Chinthakindi and Lim and Yagi disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 21, wherein: the cover layer(105 of Lim) is formed on the anti-reflective layer and the dielectric layer, covering the anti-reflective layer(126 of Lim). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1-10, 21-23 have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used in the current rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICIA D VALENZUELA whose telephone number is (571)272-9242. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Partridge can be reached at 571-270-1402. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICIA D VALENZUELA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 21, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 14, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12708031
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702000
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701980
Layer-By-Layer Formation Of Through-Substrate Via
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701999
SEMICONDUCTOR POWER MODULE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696782
ELECTRICAL TRACES ON GLASS CORES IN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+2.1%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 717 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month