Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/226,130

MICROSTRUCTURAL SURFACE INCORPORATION OF PHASE CHANGE MATERIALS FOR THERMAL MANAGEMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Examiner
WITTENBERG, STEFANIE S
Art Unit
1795
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The United States Of America AS Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
361 granted / 667 resolved
-10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
726
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 667 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 10-14 are withdrawn from consideration. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I claims 1-9 and 15-20 in the reply filed on 5 February 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 10-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-5 and 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (“A novel nano-porous aluminum substrate with anodizing treatment to encapsulate 1-tetrapropanol as composite phase change materials for thermal energy utilization” Chemical Engineering Journal, 404, 2021,124588) in view of Park et al. (KR 20220058691). Regarding claim 1, Cheng discloses a method for improving thermal conductivity and stability (Highlights) (= a process for protecting an article from thermal damage), the process comprising: Anodizing aluminum to form aluminum oxide (abstract, Figure 1) (= anodizing a metallic surface of the article to form an anodic layer comprising a metal oxide); Introducing a phase change material (PCM; e.g. 1-tetrapropanol) into the pores of the aluminum oxide pores (abstract, Figure 2) (= introducing a phase change material to pores defined by the anodic layer). PNG media_image1.png 772 1030 media_image1.png Greyscale Cheng fails to disclose the steps of annealing and sealing. In the same or similar field of anodizing and post-treatments, Park discloses anodizing aluminum alloy and post treatments including heat treatment (= anneal, furnace at 350℃, [0088]) and sealing [0001]. Park discloses that the heat treatment and sealing provides superior hardness characteristics [0127]-[0129] and the sealing process changes the physical properties of the anodized film to improve properties such as corrosion resistance [0009]. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a method comprising annealing and sealing because Park discloses heat treatment and sealing after anodizing to improve film properties including hardness and corrosion resistance. Regarding the claimed ‘in sequence’ the heat treatment and sealing of Park are performed after anodization. Carrying out introducing the phase change material of Cheng prior to sealing would have been obvious in order to providing a protecting layer with the material within the pores. Moreover, selection of any order of performing process steps is prima facie obvious in the absence of new or unexpected results (MPEP § 2144.04 IV C). Regarding claim 2, Cheng discloses wherein the metallic surface comprises aluminum (title). Regarding claim 3, Park discloses anodizing aluminum alloy [0001]. Regarding claim 4, Cheng discloses anodizing with oxalic acid (Table 1). Park discloses anodizing in oxalic acid [0001]. Regarding claim 5, Cheng discloses anodizing with sulfuric acid (Table 1). Regarding claims 7-9, Cheng in view of Park disclose the claim method. The intended use of the article as a heat sink as applied to claim 7 or casing, fan, a circuit board cooling device as applied to claim 8 or a casing as applied to claim 9 does not further limit the claimed method. Cheng discloses the method for producing materials that absorb/release thermal energy and performs heat transfer (1. Introduction). Regarding the claimed casing of claims 8-9, while Cheng in view of Park does not specifically address the intended use of a casing for example, producing any number of electronic devices including their casings would have been obvious since Cheng discloses the produce material as a heat transfer device within the field of energy storage materials (1. Introduction) including precision devices (4. Conclusion). Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (“A novel nano-porous aluminum substrate with anodizing treatment to encapsulate 1-tetrapropanol as composite phase change materials for thermal energy utilization” Chemical Engineering Journal, 404, 2021,124588), in view of Park et al. (KR 20220058691) and in further view of Bue et al. (“Analysis and Design of Phase Change Thermal Control for Light Emitting Diode (LED) Spacesuit Helmet Lights”, NASA, 2010). Regarding claim 6, Cheng discloses a phase change material including 1-tetrapropanol (abstract). Cheng does not disclose the claimed phase change material being n-eicosane. In the same or similar field of anodizing aluminum (page 26) and phase change materials for thermal applications, Bue discloses using n-eicosane (page 20) that achieves desired hot case operating temperatures. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a method comprising n-eicosane as a phase change material because Bue discloses the use of n-eicosane as having desired properties in hot case operating temperatures. Further, it would have been obvious to simply substitute one phase change material with another to produce the same or similar predictable result. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (“A novel nano-porous aluminum substrate with anodizing treatment to encapsulate 1-tetrapropanol as composite phase change materials for thermal energy utilization” Chemical Engineering Journal, 404, 2021,124588), in view of Park et al. (KR 20220058691) and in further view of Isaacs et al. (US 2018/0106564). Regarding claim 6, Cheng discloses a phase change material including 1-tetrapropanol (abstract). Cheng does not disclose the claimed phase change material being n-eicosane. Isaacs discloses phase change materials for thermal energy storage devices (abstract) including any one of tetradecane, hexadecane, and/or eicosane [0062]. Isaacs also discloses surface treatments including anodizing [0013]. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a method comprising n-eicosane because Isaacs discloses that phase change materials include n-eicosane. Isaacs discloses that phase change materials allow for the absorption, storage and/or release of energy and may also be configured to utilize convective, conductive and/or radiative heat transfer processes [0045]. It would have been obvious to simply substitute one phase change material with another to produce the same or similar predictable result. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (“A novel nano-porous aluminum substrate with anodizing treatment to encapsulate 1-tetrapropanol as composite phase change materials for thermal energy utilization” Chemical Engineering Journal, 404, 2021,124588), in view of Park et al. (KR 20220058691) and in further view of Sato et al. (US 2011/0192451). Regarding claim 15, Cheng and Park disclose the claimed invention as applied above. Park discloses heat treatment at 350 ℃ [0085]. The instant specification indicates annealing at 400 ℃ and above to satisfy the claimed melting point [0043]. The temperature of Park is therefore below the melting point of aluminum alloy. Cheng discloses vacuum impregnation of the phase change material (Figure 1). PNG media_image2.png 298 1000 media_image2.png Greyscale Cheng in view of Park does not indicate the heat treatment atmosphere therefore one of ordinary skill in the art would necessarily look to the art for workable annealing atmospheres and arrive at a reference such as Sato. Sato discloses in the field of anodizing that annealing may be performed in vacuum or air [0119], [0179]. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a method comprising annealing in air because Sato discloses that annealing may be performed for an anodized film in air or vacuum. Regarding claim 18, Cheng discloses anodizing with oxalic acid (Table 1). Park discloses anodizing in oxalic acid [0001]. Regarding claim 19, Cheng discloses anodizing with sulfuric acid (Table 1). Claim(s) 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (“A novel nano-porous aluminum substrate with anodizing treatment to encapsulate 1-tetrapropanol as composite phase change materials for thermal energy utilization” Chemical Engineering Journal, 404, 2021,124588), in view of Park et al. (KR 20220058691), in view of Sato et al. (US 2011/0192451) and in further view of Pan et al. (CN 110021695). Regarding claim 16, Park discloses sealing including boiling water sealing [0017]. Cheng in view of Park and Sato fails to disclose the claimed epoxy resin. Pan discloses in the field of anodized films wherein epoxy resin is used either as a conventional sealant or along with powder for improved sealing [0013], [0092]. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a method comprising a seal layer comprising epoxy resin because Pan discloses in the field of anodized films wherein epoxy resin is used either as a conventional sealant or along with powder for improved sealing [0013], [0092]. Claim(s) 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (“A novel nano-porous aluminum substrate with anodizing treatment to encapsulate 1-tetrapropanol as composite phase change materials for thermal energy utilization” Chemical Engineering Journal, 404, 2021,124588), in view of Park et al. (KR 20220058691), in view of Sato et al. (US 2011/0192451) and in further view of Lin et al. (US 2015/0373988). Regarding claim 17, Park discloses sealing including boiling water sealing [0017]. Cheng in view of Park and Sato fails to disclose the claimed silver paint. Lin discloses in the field of anodized films, silver containing seal agent to improve antimicrobial properties (abstract). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a method comprising silver paint as a sealant because Lin discloses that silver containing sealing agent provides improved antimicrobial properties. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (“A novel nano-porous aluminum substrate with anodizing treatment to encapsulate 1-tetrapropanol as composite phase change materials for thermal energy utilization” Chemical Engineering Journal, 404, 2021,124588), in view of Park et al. (KR 20220058691), in view of Sato et al. (US 2011/0192451) and in further view of Bue et al. (“Analysis and Design of Phase Change Thermal Control for Light Emitting Diode (LED) Spacesuit Helmet Lights”, NASA, 2010). Regarding claim 20, Cheng discloses a phase change material including 1-tetrapropanol (abstract). Cheng does not disclose the claimed phase change material being n-eicosane. In the same or similar field of anodizing aluminum (page 26) and phase change materials for thermal applications, Bue discloses using n-eicosane (page 20) that achieves desired hot case operating temperatures. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a method comprising n-eicosane as a phase change material because Bue discloses the use of n-eicosane as having desired properties in hot case operating temperatures. It would have been obvious to simply substitute one phase change material with another to produce the same or similar predictable result. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (“A novel nano-porous aluminum substrate with anodizing treatment to encapsulate 1-tetrapropanol as composite phase change materials for thermal energy utilization” Chemical Engineering Journal, 404, 2021,124588), in view of Park et al. (KR 20220058691), in view of Sato et al. (US 2011/0192451) and in further view of Isaacs et al. (US 2018/0106564). Regarding claim 20, Cheng discloses a phase change material including 1-tetrapropanol (abstract). Cheng does not disclose the claimed phase change material being n-eicosane. Isaacs discloses phase change materials for thermal energy storage devices (abstract) including any one of tetradecane, hexadecane, and/or eicosane [0062]. Isaacs also discloses surface treatments including anodizing [0013]. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a method comprising n-eicosane because Isaacs discloses that phase change materials including n-eicosane. Isaacs discloses that phase change materials allow for the absorption, storage and/or release of energy and may also be configured to utilize convective, conductive and/or radiative heat transfer processes [0045]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hale et al. “NASA Contractor Report, Phase Change Materials Handbook”, Sept. 1971. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEFANIE S WITTENBERG whose telephone number is (571)270-7594. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:00 am -4:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Luan Van can be reached at (571) 272-8521. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Stefanie S Wittenberg/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601080
HIGH-SPEED 3D METAL PRINTING OF SEMICONDUCTOR METAL INTERCONNECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595577
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THE ELECTROCHEMICAL CONVERSION OF A GASEOUS COMPOUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577699
METHOD OF LIQUID MANAGEMENT IN ANODE CHAMBER AND APPARATUS FOR PLATING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559853
DIFFERENTIAL CONTRAST PLATING FOR ADVANCED PACKAGING APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12546026
PLATING APPARATUS AND PLATING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+19.3%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 667 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month