Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/228,934

OPTIMAL HIGH VOLTAGE TUB DESIGN WITH FLOATING POLY TRENCHES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Examiner
ISAAC, STANETTA D
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
NXP Semiconductors N.V.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
50%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
838 granted / 977 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -36% lift
Without
With
+-36.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1027
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 977 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the amendment filed on 6/17/26. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 13-20 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The rejection of claim(s) 1-12 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hu et al. (US PGPub 2020/0212229, hereinafter referred to as “Hu”). Hu discloses the semiconductor device as claimed. See figures 1-18 and corresponding text, where Hu teaches, in claim 1, an integrated circuit device, comprising: a substrate (102) of a first conductivity type (figure 2; [0013]); a buried layer (104) of a second conductivity type located in the substrate (102) (figure 2; [0013]); a central isolated region (120) of the second conductivity type located over the buried layer (104); (figure 2; [0014-0015]) a first floating poly isolation structure (126) located in the substrate (102) to surround the central isolated region (120) and to extend down to and surround the buried layer (104); a second floating poly isolation structure (136) located in the substrate (102) to surround the first floating poly isolation structure (126); a shallow ring region (122) of the second conductivity type located in the substrate (102) between at least a portion of the first floating poly isolation structure (126) and a portion of the second first floating poly isolation structure (126) (figure 2; [0016-0017]); and a first conductive interconnect structure (162) for electrically shorting the central isolated region (120) to the shallow ring region (122), wherein the first floating poly isolation structure (126) is shorted to the second floating poly isolation structure (136) (figure 2; [0024-0025], [0050]). Hu teaches, in claim 2, where the buried layer extends laterally only below the central isolated region and does not extend laterally past the first floating poly isolation structure (figure 2; [0014-0015]). Hu teaches, in claim 3, where the first and second floating poly isolation structures each comprise a polysilicon structure formed in an insulating liner layer (figure 2; [0014-0015]). Hu teaches, in claim 4, where the central isolated region is electrically shorted to the shallow ring region by the first conductive interconnect structure formed with a metal interconnect structure formed over the substrate to electrically connect the central isolated region to the shallow ring region (figure 2; [0016-0017]). Hu teaches, in claim 5, where the first and second floating poly isolation structures are electrically shorted by the second conductive interconnect structure formed with a metal interconnect structure formed over the substrate to electrically connect the first floating poly isolation structure to the second floating poly isolation structure (figure 2; [0016-0017]). Hu teaches, in claim 6, where the first and second floating poly isolation structures are electrically shorted by the second conductive interconnect structure formed with an insulated polysilicon interconnect structure formed in the substrate to electrically connect the first floating poly isolation structure to the second floating poly isolation structure (figure 2; [0016-0017]). Hu teaches, in claim 7, where the shallow ring region extends at least partially down to the buried layer, and where the first and second floating poly isolation structures both extend into the substrate past the buried layer (figure 2; [0014-0015]). Hu teaches, in claim 8, wherein, when the central isolated region is set to a greater than zero potential with respect to the substrate, a voltage across peripheral ends of the buried layer to the substrate is less than a voltage across a central portion of the buried layer to the substrate (figure 2; [0024-0025], [0050]). Hu teaches, in claim 9, where the shallow ring region of the second conductivity type and underlying portion of the substrate of the first conductivity type form a punch-through structure is configured to pull-up a potential of the first floating poly isolation structure when the central isolated region is set to the greater than zero potential with respect to the substrate (figure 2; [0024-0025], [0050]). Hu teaches, in claim 10, an integrated circuit device, comprising: a substrate (102); (figure 2; [0013]) an n-type buried layer (104) located in the substrate (102); an isolated n-type region (120) located over the n-type buried layer (104), the isolated n-type region (120) and n-type buried layer (104) being vertically aligned; a first floating poly isolation trench (126) concentrically disposed in the substrate (102) to surround the isolated n-type region (120); a shallow n-type well region (122) at least partially disposed in the substrate (102) to surround the first floating poly isolation trench (126); a second floating poly isolation trench (136) concentrically disposed in the substrate (102) to surround the shallow n-type well region (122); and a first conductive interconnect structure (162) connected to electrically short the isolated n-type region (120) to the shallow n-type well region (122); and wherein the first floating poly isolation trench (126) is electrically connected to the second floating poly isolation trench (136) (figure 2; [0016-0017]). Hu teaches, in claim 11, wherein the first floating poly isolation trench is electrically connected to the second floating poly isolation trench by a metal interconnect structure formed over the substrate to electrically connect the first floating poly isolation trench to the second floating poly isolation trench (figure 2; [0016-0017]). Hu teaches, in claim 12, wherein the first floating poly isolation trench is electrically connected to the second floating poly isolation trench by a polysilicon interconnect structure formed in the substrate to electrically connect the first floating poly isolation trench to the second floating poly isolation trench (figure 2; [0016-0017]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 6/17/26, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-12 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) Nakamura (US PGPub 2008/0128828, hereinafter referred to as “Nakamura”) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Hu et al. (US PGPub 2020/0212229, hereinafter referred to as “Hu”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STANETTA D ISAAC whose telephone number is (571)272-1671. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Leonard Chang can be reached at 571-270-3691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STANETTA D ISAAC/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 August 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751037
MONOLITHIC FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR-ANTENNA DEVICE FOR TERAHERTZ WAVE DETECTION WITH INDEPENDENT PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751310
DICING DIE ATTACH FILM AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME, AND SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733494
SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT BONDING PORTION AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733528
MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12720899
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE, SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE, AND IMAGING APPARATUS
4y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
50%
With Interview (-36.2%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 977 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month