Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/229,562

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE TO INVALIDATE INFORMATION IN FIFTH GENERATION NEW RADIO (5G-NR) STATICALLY-SIZED LINKED STORAGE

Non-Final OA §103§DP
Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Examiner
DAO, TUAN C.
Art Unit
2198
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Nvidia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
642 granted / 782 resolved
+27.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
820
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 782 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION The instant application having Application No. 18/229,562 filed on is presented for examination by the examiner. Priority As required by M.P.E.P. 201.14(c), acknowledgement is made of applicant’s claim for priority based on applications filed on 12/09/2025. Drawings The applicant’s drawings submitted are acceptable for examination purposes. Information Disclosure Statement As required by M.P.E.P. 609, the applicant’s submissions of the Information Disclosure Statement dated 10/02/2025, 08/22/2025, 12/19/2024, 04/11/2024, 04/11/2024, 10/23/2023 and 08/30/2023 are acknowledged by the examiner and the cited references have been considered in the examination of the claims now pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory obviousness double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Initially, it should be noted that the present application and Application No. 18/229,288, have the same inventive entity. The assignee for both applications is NVIDIA. Claims 1, 9 and 15 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 9 and 15 of copending Application No. 18/229288. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Claims 1, 9 and 15 are compared to claim 1, 9 and 15 of co-pending Application No. 18/229288 in the following table: Claim 1, 9 and 15 are compared to claims 1, 9 and 15 of application 18/229288 in the following table: Instant Application Copending Application 18/299,288 1. A processor comprising: one or more circuits to perform an application programming interface (API) to cause information stored in one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations allocated to store shared fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information to be invalidated. 9. A system comprising: one or more processors to perform an application programming interface (API) to cause information stored in one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations allocated to store shared fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information to be invalidated. 15. A method comprising: performing an application programming interface (API) to cause information stored in one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations allocated to store shared fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information to be invalidated. 1. A processor comprising: one or more circuits to perform an application programming interface (API) to cause one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations to be allocated in order to store shared fifth generation new radio (5G-NR) information. 9. A system comprising: one or more processors to perform an application programming interface (API) to cause one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations to be allocated in order to store shared fifth generation new radio (5G-NR) information. 15. A method comprising: performing an application programming interface (API) to cause one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations to be allocated in order to store shared fifth generation new radio (5G-NR) information. The co-pending claims do not explicitly provide the limitation of “… information to be invalidated”. However, such limitation is obvious in view of the co-pending claims (i.e, claims 1 and 8). Since the co-pending claims describe “a lock-free queues”, it would have been obvious to remove the information in the queues as invalidated information (In view of paragraph 0069 and claim 2 of the instant specification). Therefore, there is no patentably distinction between the method claim and system claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 5, 8-9, and 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2012/0324067 to Hari et al. (hereafter ‘Hari”) in further view of US 2019/0349904 to Kwak et al. (hereafter “Kwak”) and US 2014/0365617 to Tomay et al. (hereafter “Tomay”) As per claim 1, Hari discloses A processor comprising: one or more circuits to perform an application programming interface (API) to cause information stored in one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520) to be allocated (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The shared-storage file system 520 is implemented such that each of the two nodes (i.e., first node 510 and second node 530) sees each queue 521 of shared-storage file system 520 as a distinct partition.” [Wingdings font/0xE0] allocating in the file system 520 as 2 two distinct partitions) allocated to store (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0029 and 0078: “remote management of an enterprise computer does not require the enterprise computer to be equipped with specific hardware/software for this purpose and/or does not require the enterprise computer to be attached to an Ethernet or WiFi network (e.g., at least some embodiments may be provided via a mobile computing device without requiring any hardware/software installation in the enterprise computer and/or at least some embodiments may be provided anywhere the mobile computing device can gain access to a data network (e.g., WiFi, 3G/4G broadband wireless, and the like))”) the shared wireless information (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0029 and 0078). Hari discloses the shared wireless information (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0029 and 0078), however Hari does not explicitly disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information, and the information to be invalidated. Kwak further discloses disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information (paragraph 0003). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Kwak into Hari’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of enable everything connected by wireless and deliver fast, rich contents and services (Kwak, paragraph 0003). Tomay further discloses the information to be invalidated (in view of the specification and claim 2, the information is invalid comprising the information is dequeued [Wingdings font/0xE0] Tomay, FIGs. 6A-6B; paragraphs 0078-0079: “the item providing system keeps an item in the queue for a predefined time period and removes the item from the queue once the predefined time interval has expired.” [Wingdings font/0xE0] time set for the information stay in the queue expired [Wingdings font/0xE0] remove the item from the queue (the information is invalid as claimed)). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Tomay into Hari’s teaching and Kwak’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of ensuring that user devices do not miss a download time due to a failed SMS message or IP notification (e.g., if the wireless mode of a user device was turned off at the time of an SMS message or an IP ring) (Tomay, paragraph 0027). As per claim 5, Hari discloses wherein the one or more statically-sized are to be organized as a first-in-first-out (FIFO) lock-free queue (paragraph 0163: “In order to ensure lock-free, synchronized operation of the shared-queue data structures of shared-storage file system 520, the read/write operations maintain properties of being atomic and in-order.”). As per claim 8, Hari does not explicitly disclose wherein the one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520) allocated (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The shared-storage file system 520 is implemented such that each of the two nodes (i.e., first node 510 and second node 530) sees each queue 521 of shared-storage file system 520 as a distinct partition.” [Wingdings font/0xE0] allocating in the file system 520 as 2 two distinct partitions) to store shared information (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0029 and 0078: “remote management of an enterprise computer does not require the enterprise computer to be equipped with specific hardware/software for this purpose and/or does not require the enterprise computer to be attached to an Ethernet or WiFi network (e.g., at least some embodiments may be provided via a mobile computing device without requiring any hardware/software installation in the enterprise computer and/or at least some embodiments may be provided anywhere the mobile computing device can gain access to a data network (e.g., WiFi, 3G/4G broadband wireless, and the like))”) are to be organized as a lock-free array queue (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520). Hari discloses the shared wireless information (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0029 and 0078), however Hari does not explicitly disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information, and the information to be invalidated. Kwak further discloses disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information (paragraph 0003). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Kwak into Hari’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of enable everything connected by wireless and deliver fast, rich contents and services (Kwak, paragraph 0003). As per claim 9, it is a system claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 1. Accordingly, claim 9 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 1. As per claim 14, it is a system claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 8. Accordingly, claim 14 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 8. As per claim 15, it is a method claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 1. Accordingly, claim 15 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 1. As per claim 16, it is a method claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 14. Accordingly, claim 16 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 14. Claims 2-3, 11, and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hari in further view of Kwak and Tomay, as applied to claims 1, 9 and 15, and further in view of US 2002/0116568 to Oksanen As per claim 2, Hari discloses the shared wireless information (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0029 and 0078), and one or more queues statically-sized regions of linked storage locations (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520), however Hari does not explicitly disclose wherein the 5G-NR information to be invalidated comprises integer data to be dequeued from the one or more queues. Kwak further discloses disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information (paragraph 0003). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Kwak into Hari’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of enable everything connected by wireless and deliver fast, rich contents and services (Kwak, paragraph 0003). Tomay further discloses wherein the 5G-NR information to be invalidated (in view of the specification and claim 2, the information is invalid comprising the information is dequeued [Wingdings font/0xE0] Tomay, FIGs. 6A-6B; paragraphs 0078-0079: “the item providing system keeps an item in the queue for a predefined time period and removes the item from the queue once the predefined time interval has expired.” [Wingdings font/0xE0] time set for the information stay in the queue expired [Wingdings font/0xE0] remove the item from the queue (the information is invalid as claimed)). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Tomay into Hari’s teaching and Kwak’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of ensuring that user devices do not miss a download time due to a failed SMS message or IP notification (e.g., if the wireless mode of a user device was turned off at the time of an SMS message or an IP ring) (Tomay, paragraph 0027). Oksamen further discloses wherein the information to be invalidated comprises integer data to be dequeued from the one or more queues (FIG. 2i; paragraph 0044). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Oksamen into Hari’s teaching, Kwak’s teaching, and Tomay’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of implementing the double-ended queue as a hierarchic data structure consisting of buffers, where the buffers forming the front and tail ends of the queue are at the highest hierarchy level of the structure and where the middle of the queue consists of buffers on adjacent levels of hierarchy in such a way that the elements of a certain level of hierarchy are buffers containing elements of the next higher level of hierarchy (which can in turn be buffers containing elements of the next higher level of hierarchy, etc.) (Oksamen, paragraph 0007). As per claim 3, Hari discloses wherein the one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations are to be organized as a lock-free data structure (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520). Hari discloses the shared wireless information (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0029 and 0078), queues are statically-sized regions of linked storage locations (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520), however, Hari does not explicitly disclose the 5G-NR information to be invalidated comprises integer data to be dequeued from the one or more queues. Kwak further discloses disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information (paragraph 0003). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Kwak into Hari’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of enable everything connected by wireless and deliver fast, rich contents and services (Kwak, paragraph 0003). Tomay further discloses the information to be invalidated (in view of the specification and claim 2, the information is invalid comprising the information is dequeued [Wingdings font/0xE0] Tomay, FIGs. 6A-6B; paragraphs 0078-0079: “the item providing system keeps an item in the queue for a predefined time period and removes the item from the queue once the predefined time interval has expired.” [Wingdings font/0xE0] time set for the information stay in the queue expired [Wingdings font/0xE0] remove the item from the queue (the information is invalid as claimed)). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Tomay into Hari’s teaching and Kwak’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of ensuring that user devices do not miss a download time due to a failed SMS message or IP notification (e.g., if the wireless mode of a user device was turned off at the time of an SMS message or an IP ring) (Tomay, paragraph 0027). Oksamen further discloses integer data to be dequeued from the one or more queues (FIG. 2i; paragraph 0044). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Oksamen into Hari’s teaching, Kwak’s teaching, and Tomay’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of implementing the double-ended queue as a hierarchic data structure consisting of buffers, where the buffers forming the front and tail ends of the queue are at the highest hierarchy level of the structure and where the middle of the queue consists of buffers on adjacent levels of hierarchy in such a way that the elements of a certain level of hierarchy are buffers containing elements of the next higher level of hierarchy (which can in turn be buffers containing elements of the next higher level of hierarchy, etc.) (Oksamen, paragraph 0007). As per claim 11, Hari discloses wherein the one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations are to be organized as a first-in-first-out (FIFO) queue (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520). Hari discloses the shared wireless information (FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0029 and 0078), however Hari does not explicitly disclose the information is 5G-NR information, and the information to be invalidated comprises integer data to be dequeued from the one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations. Kwak further discloses disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information (paragraph 0003). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Kwak into Hari’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of enable everything connected by wireless and deliver fast, rich contents and services (Kwak, paragraph 0003). Tomay further discloses the information to be invalidated (in view of the specification and claim 2, the information is invalid comprising the information is dequeued [Wingdings font/0xE0] Tomay, FIGs. 6A-6B; paragraphs 0078-0079: “the item providing system keeps an item in the queue for a predefined time period and removes the item from the queue once the predefined time interval has expired.” [Wingdings font/0xE0] time set for the information stay in the queue expired [Wingdings font/0xE0] remove the item from the queue (the information is invalid as claimed)). Oksamen further discloses the information to be invalidated comprises integer data to be dequeued from the one or more queues (FIG. 2i; paragraph 0044). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Oksamen into Hari’s teaching, Kwak’s teaching, and Tomay’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of implementing the double-ended queue as a hierarchic data structure consisting of buffers, where the buffers forming the front and tail ends of the queue are at the highest hierarchy level of the structure and where the middle of the queue consists of buffers on adjacent levels of hierarchy in such a way that the elements of a certain level of hierarchy are buffers containing elements of the next higher level of hierarchy (which can in turn be buffers containing elements of the next higher level of hierarchy, etc.) (Oksamen, paragraph 0007). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Tomay into Hari’s teaching and Kwak’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of ensuring that user devices do not miss a download time due to a failed SMS message or IP notification (e.g., if the wireless mode of a user device was turned off at the time of an SMS message or an IP ring) (Tomay, paragraph 0027). As per claim 18, it is a method claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 11. Accordingly, claim 18 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 11. As per claim 19, it is a method claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 2. Accordingly, claim 19 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 2. Claims 4, 10 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hari in further view of Kwak and Tomay, as applied to claims 1, 9 and 15, and further in view of US 2001/0013117 to Ungar. As per claim 4, Hari discloses one or more data values of the one or more statically-sized regions as queues (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520), however, Hari does not explicitly disclose the 5G-NR information to be invalidated, and modifying one or more data values of the one or more queues to no longer point to at least one of the linked storage locations. Kwak further discloses disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information (paragraph 0003). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Kwak into Hari’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of enable everything connected by wireless and deliver fast, rich contents and services (Kwak, paragraph 0003). Tomay further discloses the information to be invalidated (in view of the specification and claim 2, the information is invalid comprising the information is dequeued [Wingdings font/0xE0] Tomay, FIGs. 6A-6B; paragraphs 0078-0079: “the item providing system keeps an item in the queue for a predefined time period and removes the item from the queue once the predefined time interval has expired.” [Wingdings font/0xE0] time set for the information stay in the queue expired [Wingdings font/0xE0] remove the item from the queue (the information is invalid as claimed)). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Tomay into Hari’s teaching and Kwak’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of ensuring that user devices do not miss a download time due to a failed SMS message or IP notification (e.g., if the wireless mode of a user device was turned off at the time of an SMS message or an IP ring) (Tomay, paragraph 0027). Ungar further discloses modifying one or more data values of the one or more queues to no longer point to at least one of the linked storage locations (paragraph 0006: “References to objects on the heap may be removed by an active (i.e., currently executing) method setting the respective pointer to a "null" value, or by removal of a respective stack frame in response to completion of its associated method.”). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Ungar into Hari’s teaching, Kwak’s teaching, and Tomay’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of reclaiming memory space from a region of memory known as the heap (Ungar, paragraph 0006). As per claim 10, Hari discloses one or more data values of the one or more statically-sized regions as queues (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520), however, Hari does not explicitly disclose the 5G-NR information to be invalidated, and modifying one or more data values of the one or more queues to no longer point to at least one of the linked storage locations. Kwak further discloses disclose the wireless information is a fifth generation new radio (SG-NR) information (paragraph 0003). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Kwak into Hari’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of enable everything connected by wireless and deliver fast, rich contents and services (Kwak, paragraph 0003). Tomay further discloses the information to be invalidated (in view of the specification and claim 2, the information is invalid comprising the information is dequeued [Wingdings font/0xE0] Tomay, FIGs. 6A-6B; paragraphs 0078-0079: “the item providing system keeps an item in the queue for a predefined time period and removes the item from the queue once the predefined time interval has expired.” [Wingdings font/0xE0] time set for the information stay in the queue expired [Wingdings font/0xE0] remove the item from the queue (the information is invalid as claimed)). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Tomay into Hari’s teaching and Kwak’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of ensuring that user devices do not miss a download time due to a failed SMS message or IP notification (e.g., if the wireless mode of a user device was turned off at the time of an SMS message or an IP ring) (Tomay, paragraph 0027). Ungar further discloses modifying one or more data values of the one or more statically-sized regions to no longer indicate at least one of the linked storage locations (paragraph 0006: “References to objects on the heap may be removed by an active (i.e., currently executing) method setting the respective pointer to a "null" value, or by removal of a respective stack frame in response to completion of its associated method.”). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Ungar into Hari’s teaching, Kwak’s teaching, and Tomay’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of reclaiming memory space from a region of memory known as the heap (Ungar, paragraph 0006). As per claim 17, it is a method claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 10. Accordingly, claim 17 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 10. Claims 6 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hari in further view of Kwak and Tomay, as applied to claims 1 and 9, and further in view of US 2009/0063735 to Ng et al. (hereafter “Ng”). As per claim 6, Hari discloses the information stored in the queues (paragraphs 0163-0165), the queue is the one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations (in view of paragraph 0069 of the specification, and claim 11, locations are considered as nodes or specific places, therefore Hari FIGs. 1 and 5; paragraphs 0163-0165: “The IPOST interface with shared-storage file system 520 includes a pair of shared circular packet queues 521.sub.1 and 521.sub.2 (collectively, circular packet queues 521).” [Wingdings font/0xE0] circular packet queue is a fixed size data structure (statically-size regions as claimed) as 2 distinct partitions (particular/specific places) in a file system 520). Hari does not explicitly disclose the information is 5G-NR information, and wherein the API is to cause the oldest information stored by the one or more queues to be invalidated. Kwak further discloses disclose the information is 5G-NR information (paragraph 0003). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Kwak into Hari’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of enable everything connected by wireless and deliver fast, rich contents and services (Kwak, paragraph 0003). Ng further discloses wherein the API is to cause the oldest information stored by the one or more queues to be invalidated (FIG. 2; paragraph 0046: identified as a oldest age and be removed). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Ng into Hari’s teaching, Kwak’s teaching and Tomay’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of A leading ones detection circuit identifies the oldest ready request closest to the bottom of the age queue. The leading ones detection circuit generates an enable bit vector to allow selection circuitry to read out the ID tag of the entry that the enable bit vector selects from the age queue. This ID tag is the winning ID tag that identifies the result of arbitration, namely the particular request in the request queue that the core interface unit should next dispatch to an L2 cache or other appropriate memory for execution (Ng, paragraph 0046). As per claim 12, it is a system claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 6. Accordingly, claim 12 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 6. Claims 7, 13 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hari in further view of Kwak and Tomay, as applied to claims 1, 9 and 15, and further in view of US 2016/0313919 to Chambliss et al. (hereafter “Chambliss”). As per claim 7, Hari discloses does not explicitly disclose wherein the API is to receive one or more parameters to indicate the one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations. Chambliss further discloses wherein the API is to receive one or more parameters to indicate the one or more statically-sized regions of linked storage locations (paragraphs 0014 and 0016: “a block write command is received on I/O interface 101. The block write command includes a write address designating a particular block in the main storage 106 that is the target of the block write command, and write data comprising an amount of data corresponding to the size of a fixed storage block in main storage 106.”). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine a teaching of Chambliss into Hari’s teaching, Kwak’s teaching and Tomay’s teaching because it would provide for the purpose of implementing sub-block I/O commands may be used in conjunction with workloads that generate relatively small reads and writes, such as, for example, key-value storage, database management systems (DBMS), or a journaling or log-structured file systems (Chambliss, paragraph 0012). As per claim 13, it is a system claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 7. Accordingly, claim 13 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 7. As per claim 20, it is a method claim, which recite(s) the same limitations as those of claim 13. Accordingly, claim 20 is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claim 13. Conclusion The following prior art made of record and not relied upon is cited to establish the level of skill in the applicant’s art and those arts considered reasonably pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. See MPEP 707.05(c). Prior arts: US 2020/0004430 to Navon The search sequence stack may be a fixed-size search sequence buffer 121 in RAM 116 having space to hold N entries, where the oldest entry is removed from search sequence buffer 121 when the read address information from the current read command is inserted. US 2017/0286444 to Chambliss Entries may be removed either by invalidation or eviction. Invalidation of an entry may occur because the deduplication engine has determined that the corresponding chunk is no longer being stored so the entry is no longer valid. US 2016/0133133 to Triplett According to certain embodiments, entries from a completed queue may expire (e.g., be removed from the queue) once a certain amount of time elapses, such as an amount of time after the time at which the vehicle was returned to the driver. US 2016/0092183 to Radigan in some embodiments, a compiler 134 creates and/or manages a call site cache 214 whose entries are either null or the addresses 210 previously encountered during execution of an application. The call site cache 214 may be implemented for instance as a fixed size array of contiguous entries, each entry the size of a function pointer, and each entry corresponding to a different call site. US 2014/0257821 to Adams Other systems may eliminate the always-on low power trigger detector, and use an always-on circular buffer (e.g., a data structure that uses a single, fixed-size buffer as if it were connected end-to-end). The circular buffer starts empty and is typically of a predetermined length. The oldest entries are removed first from the circular buffer when (and as) needed. US 2008/0114942 to Brown Periodic invalidation of the dynamic portion of the spatial index may be performed in anticipation that a new dynamic spatial index corresponding to new positions of objects (e.g., due to movement or collision) within the three dimensional scene may be used by the image processing system. Consequently, the new dynamic spatial index may be stored in the memory cache. By periodically invalidating only the dynamic portion of the memory cache, US 2006/0217130 to Rowitch The SID Self Learning Database 2606 is a circular fixed size array with entries sorted by GPS time, with each having the format illustrated in FIG. 29. The size of the array is chosen based on typical travel assumptions. Assuming a typical subscriber travels between Korea, Japan, and the United States, a fixed size array of 55 entries may be appropriate. Each entry is initially set to a default null value. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tuan Dao whose telephone number is (571) 270 3387. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday from 09am to 05pm. The examiner can also be reached on alternate Fridays. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pierre Vital, can be reached at telephone number (571) 272 4215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /TUAN C DAO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2198
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Mar 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602257
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD WITH MODEL CO-LOCATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12566648
METHOD OF PROCESSING AGREEMENT TASK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566627
PREDICTING THE NEXT BEST COMPRESSOR IN A STREAM DATA PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12561173
METHOD FOR DATA PROCESSING AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561591
CLASSIFICATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF SEQUENTIAL EVENT DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.6%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 782 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month