Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/231,865

TOUCH SENSOR PANEL AND TOUCH INPUT DEVICE WITH REDUCED MAGNITUDE OF LOW GROUND MASS INTERFERENCE SIGNAL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Priority
Aug 03, 2018 — RE 10-2018-0090991 +3 more
Examiner
SAADAT, CAMERON
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
HiDeep Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
70 granted / 134 resolved
-9.8% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
141
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.2%
+16.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 134 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
3NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION Claims 1-16 are pending in this broadening reissue of U.S. Patent No. 11,537,248 (hereinafter “the '248 patent” issued from application no. 17/263,770 (hereinafter “the ‘770 application”). Prior or Concurrent Proceedings Applicant is reminded of the continuing obligation under 37 CFR 1.178(b), to timely apprise the Office of any prior or concurrent proceed-ing in which the ‘248 patent is or was involved. These proceedings would include interferences, reissues, reexaminations, and litigation. Information Material to Patentability Applicant is further reminded of the continuing obligation under 37 CFR 1.56, to timely apprise the Office of any information which is mate-rial to patentability of the claims under consideration in this reissue appli-cation. These obligations rest with each individual associated with the filing and prosecution of this application for reissue. See also MPEP §§ 1404, 1442.01 and 1442.04. Preliminary Amendment Preliminary amendment filed 8/9/2023 has been entered and considered. Claims 1-16 have been amended and are currently pending. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: The “touch input device 1000” described in the specification of the ‘248 patent is not shown in the drawings. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the elements. See MPEP § 2172.01. Independent claims 1 and 9 recite a touch input device having a plurality of first electrodes, a plurality of second electrodes, and a touch window area. The claims further recite functional language “a value acquired by a multiplication…”, but there is no structural element recited in the claim that would allow for the claimed function to be performed. The specification of the ‘248 patent describes essential elements such as sensing unit 11, driving unit 12, and control unit 13 for the claimed touch input device to function and perform the recited function. These elements are omitted from independent claims 1 and 9. The Examiner further notes that the sensing unit 11, driving unit 12, and control unit 13 may invoke 112 6th paragraph claim interpretation if the claims are amended to recite these elements, since they are generic place holder terms, in which case the written description would need to clearly link the corresponding structure associated with the generic place holder terms that are required for performing the claimed functions. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 are rejected, but would be allowable upon overcoming the rejection above for the same reasons indicated in the notice of allowance mailed 8/10/2022 in the underlying ‘770 application. CONCLUSION Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Cameron Saadat whose telephone number is (571)272-4443. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hetul Patel can be reached at (571) 272-4184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Cameron Saadat/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992 Conferees: /Karin Reichle/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992 /ALEXANDER J KOSOWSKI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3992
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent RE50938
SHIFT REGISTER UNIT, GATE DRIVING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent RE50922
GATE DRIVER, ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent RE50775
SHOCK WAVE DEVICE WITH POLARITY SWITCHING
2y 8m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent RE50736
DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR ELECTRICALLY-ISOLATING LIGHT EMITTING DIODE IN DISPLAY PANEL
3y 1m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent RE50395
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 22, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+27.1%)
3y 11m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 134 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month